Home› U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Just Completed 85% of Morgans in PL

RichRRichR Posts: 3,986 ✭✭✭✭✭

After a five-year search, I finally found a clean, white 1892-P...which was surprisingly elusive...for not crazy money.

So that's 85% of the Morgan set in 62-64PL...which I really appreciate more than my straight Unc. Morgan set, even though many of them are in higher grades.

Unfortunately, the remaining 15% will be crazy money!

Comments

  • Options
    LukeMarshallLukeMarshall Posts: 2,214 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Nice going!

    Are there any dates that have no known PL surfaces?

    It's all about what the people want...

  • Options
    gumby1234gumby1234 Posts: 5,899 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @RichR post some pics so we can all see these nice Morgans :)

    Successful BST with ad4400, Kccoin, lablover, pointfivezero, koynekwest, jwitten, coin22lover, HalfDimeDude, erwindoc, jyzskowsi, COINS MAKE CENTS, AlanSki, BryceM

  • Options
    vulcanizevulcanize Posts: 1,418 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Please post pics. Would really love to see them.

    My quest for morgans in PL stopped right after acquiring 1880/9 S and the 1881 CC because it was starting to get ridiculously expensive. :blush:

  • Options
    WalkerfanWalkerfan Posts: 10,424 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Awesome achievement!!

    Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍

    My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):

    https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/

  • Options
    david3142david3142 Posts: 3,701 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 3, 2022 9:27AM

    Both of these are amazing accomplishments and I’d love to see pictures. Are we talking date set or full date/MM set? A full MS Morgan set is extremely impressive.

  • Options
    rickoricko Posts: 98,721 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Well done... that is a great collection... Definitely post some pictures.... Morgans in PL are really nice coins. Cheers, RickO

  • Options
    Steven59Steven59 Posts: 11,540 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Sounds like quite an accomplishment

    "Memento mori !"

  • Options
    RichRRichR Posts: 3,986 ✭✭✭✭✭

    [Both of these are amazing accomplishments and I’d love to see pictures. Are we talking date set or full date/MM set? A full MS Morgan set is extremely impressive.]

    Full date/MM based on the coins typically listed in a "normal" registry set...but not including the multitude of VAMS...although I have a few of those also.

  • Options
    david3142david3142 Posts: 3,701 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Link to registry? We want pics! 😆

  • Options
    coastaljerseyguycoastaljerseyguy Posts: 2,171 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @LukeMarshall said:
    Nice going!

    Are there any dates that have no known PL surfaces?

    Wasn't the 1901 P difficult to obtain in PL?

  • Options
    RichRRichR Posts: 3,986 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 3, 2022 1:58PM

    [Wasn't the 1901 P difficult to obtain in PL?]

    Yes...and that's why it isn't included in the 85% completed!

    So I probably won't live to accomplish that!

  • Options
    cameonut2011cameonut2011 Posts: 11,342 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Awesome what do the 1884-S, 1892-S, 1893-S, 1895-S, 1896-S, 1896-O, 1879-CC, 1889-CC, and 1893-CC look like?

  • Options
    messydeskmessydesk Posts: 20,888 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @LukeMarshall said:
    Nice going!

    Are there any dates that have no known PL surfaces?

    If you count the overdates, there are no known 87/6-O in PCGS PL holders. There's a lone NGC 58PL with a CAC sticker. The 82-O/S is also pop 0 unless you're looking at the VAM 4 EDS, which is a 5-figure coin.

    01 and 21-S are super rare with PL surfaces. One of the 2 21-S die pairs known this way has some heavy patches of die polishing lines that distract from the mirrors.

  • Options
    ChangeInHistoryChangeInHistory Posts: 3,131 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Impressive set! Hope the other 15% show up sooner than you expect.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file