North/South/Central American Coins Thursday, let's see them!

Options
1…3233353738…64

Comments

  • WCC
    WCC Posts: 3,322 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @Boosibri said:

    @WCC said:
    Waiting to receive this one.

    I saw that one! I missed the 1770-G 2R right before this one

    Sorry to hear that. I assumed you knew about it and bought it. It sold for what I consider a strong price (1100 CHF, more than the one I bought) but with a mintage of only 4,012, I'm not sure there is a better one. I'd grade it a F-15 but I think it it's eligible for a VF holder.

    For the one I bought, the only other comparable (and maybe slightly better) one I know is the Ortiz specimen.

  • Boosibri
    Boosibri Posts: 12,715 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @WCC said:

    @Boosibri said:

    @WCC said:
    Waiting to receive this one.

    I saw that one! I missed the 1770-G 2R right before this one

    Sorry to hear that. I assumed you knew about it and bought it. It sold for what I consider a strong price (1100 CHF, more than the one I bought) but with a mintage of only 4,012, I'm not sure there is a better one. I'd grade it a F-15 but I think it it's eligible for a VF holder.

    For the one I bought, the only other comparable (and maybe slightly better) one I know is the Ortiz specimen.

    I believe your example is the rare variety without the ligature in the MA. Tough to tell from the photos but worth checking.

  • WCC
    WCC Posts: 3,322 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @Boosibri said:

    @WCC said:

    @Boosibri said:

    @WCC said:
    Waiting to receive this one.

    I saw that one! I missed the 1770-G 2R right before this one

    Sorry to hear that. I assumed you knew about it and bought it. It sold for what I consider a strong price (1100 CHF, more than the one I bought) but with a mintage of only 4,012, I'm not sure there is a better one. I'd grade it a F-15 but I think it it's eligible for a VF holder.

    For the one I bought, the only other comparable (and maybe slightly better) one I know is the Ortiz specimen.

    I believe your example is the rare variety without the ligature in the MA. Tough to tell from the photos but worth checking.

    Thanks, I'll do that upon receipt.

  • bidask
    bidask Posts: 14,057 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @pruebas said:
    Why do you need two of the same coin? You starting a museum and need to show front and back?

    @bidask said:

    Oh, and the reverse on both coins are really nice too.

    Both are pop one and I wanted a PL too .😊

    I manage money. I earn money. I save money .
    I give away money. I collect money.
    I don’t love money . I do love the Lord God.




  • pruebas
    pruebas Posts: 5,284 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @Eddi your pics are fine. Great medal! I think a few medals here and there add depth to a collection.

  • Eddi
    Eddi Posts: 633 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @pruebas said:
    @Eddi your pics are fine. Great medal! I think a few medals here and there add depth to a collection.

    @pruebas, thank you very much, Sir!

  • Weiss
    Weiss Posts: 9,942 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited May 16, 2021 1:24PM
    Options

    1979 Bolivian proof silver 200 pesos (Year of the Child).
    Struck in .925 silver by Swiss refinery Valcombi
    KM#198
    Mintage: 15,000

    We are like children who look at print and see a serpent in the last letter but one, and a sword in the last.
    --Severian the Lame
  • HoledandCreative
    HoledandCreative Posts: 2,890 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options


  • Abuelo
    Abuelo Posts: 2,059 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @pruebas no assayer.

  • Abuelo
    Abuelo Posts: 2,059 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    I have to say @pruebas never disappoints.

  • TwoKopeiki
    TwoKopeiki Posts: 9,969 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @Abuelo said:
    @pruebas no assayer.

    Isn't there also supposed to be a denomination along with assayer initial on the reverse? Or am I thinking of later issues?

  • Abuelo
    Abuelo Posts: 2,059 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @TwoKopeiki said:

    @Abuelo said:
    @pruebas no assayer.

    Isn't there also supposed to be a denomination along with assayer initial on the reverse? Or am I thinking of later issues?

    The assayer can be found on obverse or reverse depending 9n the assayer, but the value is always on the columns' side, if that is what you mean.

  • pruebas
    pruebas Posts: 5,284 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited June 11, 2021 6:10PM
    Options

    @Abuelo said:
    @pruebas no assayer.

    Correct. Missing the assayer (R in this case) and the mintmark (Mo).

    IIRC there are 4-5 known. I believe this to be the second finest. I also own the finest, which has a different die on the pillar side. (I don’t have a good photo of that coin.)

    Edited to add: Nobody knows why these exist. I think they are probably errors.

  • Boosibri
    Boosibri Posts: 12,715 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited June 11, 2021 8:06PM
    Options

    @pruebas said:

    @Abuelo said:
    @pruebas no assayer.

    Correct. Missing the assayer (R in this case) and the mintmark (Mo).

    IIRC there are 4-5 known. I believe this to be the second finest. I also own the finest, which has a different die on the pillar side. (I don’t have a good photo of that coin.)

    Edited to add: Nobody knows why these exist. I think they are probably errors.

    And in the next episode of Hoarders…

  • Euclid
    Euclid Posts: 128 ✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Happy Thursday everyone. I got one in the mail today. It seems like a solid XF to me but I don't have a lot of practice with the circulated grades on these. What does everyone think?




  • Yorkshireman
    Yorkshireman Posts: 4,616 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Here is my new one.

    Yorkshireman,Obsessed collector of round, metallic pieces of history.Hunting for Latin American colonial portraits plus cool US & British coins.
  • bigmarty58
    bigmarty58 Posts: 2,002 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Enthusiastic collector of British pre-decimal and Canadian decimal circulation coins.
  • Abuelo
    Abuelo Posts: 2,059 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @JohnnyCache it seems to me that the half real look better than 62, at least in the picture.

  • Abuelo
    Abuelo Posts: 2,059 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @pruebas were these part of the last submission filled with attribution errors on PCGS part?

  • pruebas
    pruebas Posts: 5,284 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @Abuelo said:
    @pruebas were these part of the last submission filled with attribution errors on PCGS part?

    @Abuelo yes. However, they were correct.

  • JohnnyCache
    JohnnyCache Posts: 1,920 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 15, 2021 2:07PM
    Options

    @Abuelo said:
    @JohnnyCache it seems to me that the half real look better than 62, at least in the picture.

    .

    Well it was in an NGC 64 holder, now that's not to say that it should, or shouldn't be, a 64 but I do think a MS63 would have been appropriate.

    Look at this PCGS 1773 1/2 Real in MS63 to me it looks like it has a staple scratch at the lower right reverse and overall doesn't look as nice as the one I sent in. See both of these coins True Views here

    .
    Coin from Stacks Auction

    .
    Mine

    In the end, I can live with with it as an MS62.

    jc

  • Abuelo
    Abuelo Posts: 2,059 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @pruebas so restoration cannot fix it?

  • pruebas
    pruebas Posts: 5,284 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @Abuelo said:
    @pruebas so restoration cannot fix it?

    Nope. The surface is etched from the acid.

  • Abuelo
    Abuelo Posts: 2,059 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Catastrophic @pruebas

  • 1984worldcoins
    1984worldcoins Posts: 774 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Maybe I have already posted this, but anyway, a medal (silver, NGC MS65) with all the 3 mints that have minted the 1984 coins:

  • tcollects
    tcollects Posts: 1,139 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    these joined the herd this week - I love the sunface on the 1/2

  • Boosibri
    Boosibri Posts: 12,715 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @tcollects said:
    these joined the herd this week - I love the sunface on the 1/2

    Ecuador coinage is under rated

  • coinandcurrency242
    coinandcurrency242 Posts: 1,992 ✭✭✭✭
    Options


    Positive BST as a seller: Namvet69, Lordmarcovan, Bigjpst, Soldi, mustanggt, CoinHoader, moursund, SufinxHi, al410, JWP

  • BustDMs
    BustDMs Posts: 1,706 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options


    Just a piece of one.

    Q: When does a collector become a numismatist?



    A: The year they spend more on their library than their coin collection.



    A numismatist is judged more on the content of their library than the content of their cabinet.
  • pruebas
    pruebas Posts: 5,284 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited August 12, 2021 8:31AM
    Options

    Not exactly a coin, but a proto-coin. This is a blank planchet for an unknown mint/date Mexican Republic 8R with a proper edge.

    And just for fun, here is a blank planchet for a 1982-1989 Silver Libertad Onza, with a proper (lettered) edge.

  • TwoKopeiki
    TwoKopeiki Posts: 9,969 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Those are pretty neat, @pruebas

    Can't be too many Cap and Rays planchets around.

  • pruebas
    pruebas Posts: 5,284 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @TwoKopeiki said:
    Those are pretty neat, @pruebas

    Can't be too many Cap and Rays planchets around.

    I haven't seen any others, but they may be out there.

    But the onza planchet should theoretically be rarer, given the strict controls of precious metals in the mint these days. It may have been removed by an official for "personal use" to get around those controls.

  • YQQ
    YQQ Posts: 3,460 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    here is a nice Newfoundland Gold $2 or 200 cents

    Today is the first day of the rest of my life
  • coinandcurrency242
    coinandcurrency242 Posts: 1,992 ✭✭✭✭
    Options


    Positive BST as a seller: Namvet69, Lordmarcovan, Bigjpst, Soldi, mustanggt, CoinHoader, moursund, SufinxHi, al410, JWP

  • JohnnyCache
    JohnnyCache Posts: 1,920 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @TwoKopeiki said:
    Great pair, @JohnnyCache ! I haven't posted any additions since my fiasco with the 2 raw toners back in May that turned out to be artificially toned. I did receive my money back from the seller, which was the best outcome i could have hoped for.

    Still waiting to get this one in-hand:


    That's a beauty!

    The shipping from Heritage appears to be a bit slow.
    I have my account set up for FedEX only, but then called HA in order to manually bump that service up to overnight.

    I agree that getting your money back from that other deal was definitely the best outcome.