New 1946-D 50c Upgrade to my Late Date Walker Set
ThreeCentSilverFL
Posts: 1,694 ✭✭✭✭✭
GTG if you'd like. Unfortunate scuffs dead center on both sides of the holder.
1
Comments
Ima say 65.
Love the luster---surfaces look like they're on FIRE!!
Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍
My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):
https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/
Nice luster, many scattered marks and hits, I'd say MS64
My Collection of Old Holders
Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
Liner 64/65. I think the marks on the sun might hold it to 64. Great luster as mentioned in both GTGs above.
I would think 65, or 64 on a bad day.
Jim
When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln
Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.....Mark Twain
Big Dawg Luster!
The luster carries the grade to 65
“We are only their care-takers,” he posed, “if we take good care of them, then centuries from now they may still be here … ”
Todd - BHNC #242
My bad on the photos, actually a mark-free sun.
65+ or 66.
"“Those who sacrifice liberty for security/safety deserve neither.“(Benjamin Franklin)
"I only golf on days that end in 'Y'" (DE59)
I'm in the 65 camp as well.
People are low balling this coin. It is a 65 or up for sure
66
65, good looking coin.
Guessing 66. Nice pick up!!!
Boxcars!
I would call it a 65.... ding in the obverse field.... If the picture overstates it, the coin could easily be a 66. Cheers, RickO
Great guesses all. It's actually in a 66+ holder. I have 65's and 66's and I'm still trying to sometimes tell the difference between the two (in Walkers). However, this is the only 66+ I have and I'm inclined to think the booming luster got it the "+". Thanks for looking!
Nice thumb.