Morgan Dollar Choice - Which do you prefer?
Given approximately the same cost, the same grade, the same TPG and very similar reverses - which one would you take home?

Comments
-
All other things being equal, I’ll take the colorful one. I’ve got several shiny white ones and would love to add a nice toner.
3 -
I prefer the original and colorful one on the left.
Duh.
😈
2 -
The one with color.
ED
.....................................................2 -
Colorful everyday !
Pat Vetter,Mercury Dime registry set,1938 Proof set registry,Pat & BJ Coins:724-325-72112 -
Interesting trend so far and not what I expected. They are both graded MS67 by our hosts, if that changes anything.
Tim
0 -
Definitely give me some color
1 -
@pointfivezero said:
Interesting trend so far and not what I expected. They are both graded MS67 by our hosts, if that changes anything.Tim
Wait for ricko.
I like color and if that is a 67, I bet it’s nicer looking in hand.
Seated Half Society member #38
"She comes out of the sun in a silk dress,
running like a water color in the rain...."1 -
COLOR!!
1 -
I’m cheap. I would not pay 67 money for either. The luster better be all there. The toner lols to dark for my tastes. I’d also look for a cleaner coin than the blast white coin. It might be a 67 but to me if I were looking for one I’d try to find a cleaner coin. BTW I do like toners. Just not that one
Martin
1 -
The toned one. The other one has a dipped to hell and back look.
1 -
@Martin said:
I’m cheap. I would not pay 67 money for either. The luster better be all there. The toner lols to dark for my tastes. I’d also look for a cleaner coin than the blast white coin. It might be a 67 but to me if I were looking for one I’d try to find a cleaner coin. BTW I do like toners. Just not that oneMartin
Yes, maybe that's a better question - are either worthy of an MS67 holder?
0 -
There both great looking morgans i just dont think there worthy of a 67 grade. Maybe 66+ tops IMHO pass on both
1 -
Brilliant one. The toner inferior due to surface abrasions on cheek, tarnished look. The brilliant one PQ w super cartwheel luster.
Investor1 -
I like the blast white one more but would be happy to own either one.
1 -
I'd lean towards the toner. It's no monster (or even high end color) but it is above average. The untoned example looks average. If the cost is about the same, the toner should be a better value.
1 -
With MS67 grade, I’d pick the toned one every time if cost wasn’t an issue.
1 -
67? With That cheek?
Previous transactions: Wondercoin, goldman86, dmarks, Type24 -
Observation:
Toned- 10 votes
White- 2 votesConclusion:
Those two coins would not be priced equally.1 -
I would take the blast white Morgan, that thing looks like a luster bomb! However, I also like the toned one.
1 -
@MasonG said:
Observation:
Toned- 10 votes
White- 2 3 votesConclusion:
Those two coins would not be priced equally.And yet they are in the same neighborhood.....
0 -
Easily the color one.
1 -
With only the obverse to be viewed, no question to me, the white coin wins hands down. I immediately was drawn to the toned coins facial destruction compared to the white coin's far smoother and less chattered skin. I'm a toned coin guy and there would still be no decision to be made for me.
Jim
When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln
Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.....Mark Twain1 -
@pointfivezero said:
And yet they are in the same neighborhood.....I wouldn't be surprised to hear that, but... were they offered for sale in the same venue, to the same group of buyers?
1 -
Coin one.
Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value. Zero. Voltaire. Ebay coinbowlllc
1 -
@MasonG said:
@pointfivezero said:
And yet they are in the same neighborhood.....I wouldn't be surprised to hear that, but... were they offered for sale in the same venue, to the same group of buyers?
@MasonG said:
@pointfivezero said:
And yet they are in the same neighborhood.....They are both currently for sale from the same online dealer. Don’t want to say more as I will likely purchase one of them.
0 -
I wouldn't want to give 67 money for either IMHO.
"Ain't None of Them play like him (Bix Beiderbecke) Yet."
Louis Armstrong3 -
The color is muted. In this case, I'd go for white and flashy..
Dead people tell interesting tales.1 -
@pointfivezero said:
They are both currently for sale from the same online dealer. Don’t want to say more as I will likely purchase one of them.Fair enough. Which one do you think would disappear first if people knew they were available?
0 -
@MasonG said:
@pointfivezero said:
They are both currently for sale from the same online dealer. Don’t want to say more as I will likely purchase one of them.Fair enough. Which one do you think would disappear first if people knew they were available?
Good question - the white coin has been available for awhile. The toner was just added today.
0 -
Current score from this esteemed group:
Toner = 12
White = 5
No way = 4Tim
0 -
Color is too much. If I was buying a 67 I would want to see the mark free surfaces. So, I'll go with the white on the right.
bob
Registry: CC lowballs (boblindstrom), bobinvegas1989@yahoo.com2 -
The toner got an eye appeal bump in grade because of the toning, so there's sort of already a toning premium baked into it. That said, it's a more unique, special coin than the white one. If I wanted a white 82-S Morgan in 67, I'd find one with concave fields. Those are breathtaking and priced like generic 82-Ss in 67. It's sort of a unique feature of some coins of that date.
John
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution1 -
@messydesk said:
The toner got an eye appeal bump in grade because of the toning, so there's sort of already a toning premium baked into it. That said, it's a more unique, special coin than the white one. If I wanted a white 82-S Morgan in 67, I'd find one with concave fields. Those are breathtaking and priced like generic 82-Ss in 67. It's sort of a unique feature of some coins of that date.You guys are prying out all my secrets - this is an '82-CC.
Tim
0 -
"Don’t want to say more as I will likely purchase one of them."
"You guys are prying out all my secrets - this is an '82-CC."
You let the cat out of the bag......took about 30 seconds to find em'.

1 -
Neither. I'd go more for the VF to XF range like the example below. I like something that has a history & some actual "use" in its background over higher-grade/blast/toned ones.... (doesn't hurt that they're more within my budget, either).
2 -
The colorful one is pretty, but not spectacular and maybe has a bit more chatter than I’d like for a 67. The white one doesn’t look that special for a white one. I’d want a coin with more frost on the devices at that grade level. I don’t think I’d buy either
JK Coin Photography - eBay Consignments | High Quality Photos | LOW Prices | 20% of Consignment Proceeds Go to Pancreatic Cancer Research2 -
@pointfivezero said:
@messydesk said:
The toner got an eye appeal bump in grade because of the toning, so there's sort of already a toning premium baked into it. That said, it's a more unique, special coin than the white one. If I wanted a white 82-S Morgan in 67, I'd find one with concave fields. Those are breathtaking and priced like generic 82-Ss in 67. It's sort of a unique feature of some coins of that date.You guys are prying out all my secrets - this is an '82-CC.
Tim
OK, that explains the slightly more scuffs than I would have expected otherwise. It also explains why there really isn't much of a toning premium, as an 82-CC in 67 is already a fairly spendy coin.
John
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution1 -
I'd whip out my loupe and find the better VAM. Peace Roy
BST: endeavor1967, synchr, kliao, Outhaul, Donttellthewife, U1Chicago, ajaan, mCarney1173, SurfinHi, MWallace, Sandman70gt, mustanggt, Pittstate03, Lazybones, Walkerguy21D, coinandcurrency242 , thebigeng, Collectorcoins, JimTyler, USMarine6, Elkevvo, Coll3ctor, Yorkshireman, CUKevin, ranshdow, CoinHunter4, bennybravo, Centsearcher, braddick, Windycity, ZoidMeister, mirabela, JJM, RichURich, Bullsitter, jmski52, LukeMarshall, coinsarefun, MichaelDixon, NickPatton, ProfLiz, Twobitcollector,Jesbroken oih82w8, DCW
1 -
Definitely NOT the tarnished coin.... Surprise, surprise (said in my best Gomer Pyle accent)...
I do not like a tarnished coin
I will not buy a tarnished coin
Not even a little,
Certainly not a lot
Not for me, that tarnished coin.
Cheers, RickO4 -
I am Not a fan of toning, so it is the "White" one for me.
1 -
@AUandAG said:
Color is too much. If I was buying a 67 I would want to see the mark free surfaces. So, I'll go with the white on the right.bob

Agree. I'd wonder what that dark toning is hiding. Hairlines perhaps? At least the brilliant white coin can be easily examined for any small surface flaws.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire2
Leave a Comment
Categories
- All Categories
- 520.1K Coins and Currency - PCGS
- 328.5K U.S. Coin Forum
- 14.8K PCGS Set Registry Forum
- 5.2K Q & A Forum
- 41.4K World & Ancient Coins Forum
- 3K U.S. & World Currency Forum
- 96.4K Buy, Sell, & Trade - U.S. Coins
- 7.3K Buy, Sell & Trade - World & Ancient Coins
- 1.5K Buy, Sell & Trade - Currency
- 60 Random
- 246.2K Trading Cards, Autographs and Memorabilia - PSA
- 90.3K Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum
- 1.7K Autographs Forum
- 16.4K PSA Set Registry Forum
- 22K Sports Talk
- 115K Buy, Sell & Trade - Cards & Memorabilia
- 663 Buy, Sell & Trade - Autographs
- 2.2K Stamps
- 1.5K Stamps Forum
- 670 Buy, Sell & Trade - Stamps
- 83 Coin Shows
- 83 General Coin Show Information and Discussion
- 11.9K Misc
- 11.9K Testing Forum
















