Home U.S. Coin Forum

How Old Does Something Have To Be...

BroadstruckBroadstruck Posts: 30,497 ✭✭✭✭✭

To not instantly at first glance deem it Modern Junk?

To Err Is Human.... To Collect Err's Is Just Too Much Darn Tootin Fun!

Comments

  • pursuitoflibertypursuitofliberty Posts: 7,138 ✭✭✭✭✭

    One year after I was born. I was still a classic. After that, not so much!

    :D


    “We are only their care-takers,” he posed, “if we take good care of them, then centuries from now they may still be here … ”

    Todd - BHNC #242
  • mcarney1173mcarney1173 Posts: 926 ✭✭✭✭✭

    1999

  • 291fifth291fifth Posts: 24,498 ✭✭✭✭✭

    1933

    All glory is fleeting.
  • fathomfathom Posts: 1,796 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I don't think a time frame exists that would cover all the differing perspectives.

    Similarly, how does one define "Modern Junk".

    A controversial subject, pornography was once defined by a politician: "I know it when I see it".

  • CommemDudeCommemDude Posts: 2,293 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I wouldn't call modern coins junk, but I see the end of the Walking Liberty Half to be the end of a great era for regular and commemorative coinage, so I would say 1947

    Dr Mikey
    Commems and Early Type
  • CatbertCatbert Posts: 7,435 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Not that I’m a big registry participant, but would like to see the type series end at 1965.

    Seated Half Society member #38
    "Got a flaming heart, can't get my fill"
  • ms70ms70 Posts: 13,956 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @PQueue said:
    Post 1964 is a nice cut off. One could also use post 1939, post 1945, or post 1958. I'm sure others have different view points.

    I used to go with 1964 then I bumped it up to 1999.

    Great transactions with oih82w8, JasonGaming, Moose1913.

  • amwldcoinamwldcoin Posts: 11,269 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November 1, 2020 7:53AM

    1916 >:)

  • ShaunBC5ShaunBC5 Posts: 1,755 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Modern and junk are certainly separate categories to me, but ‘64 is usually my cutoff for what is and isn’t modern coinage.
    Junk knows no such bounds.

  • Batman23Batman23 Posts: 4,999 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It depends. Is it presidential... then most likely modern junk. The presidential exception for me is pre-1930 Lincolns.

  • CoinHoarderCoinHoarder Posts: 2,614 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @291fifth said:
    1933

    I think years ago, this was the benchmark. Because as I understand it, starting in 1934, coin collecting became more popular, and dealers began saving rolls and bags of the current coins. Prior to that, not so much. Makes sense to me.

  • JimnightJimnight Posts: 10,846 ✭✭✭✭✭

    2000

  • jesbrokenjesbroken Posts: 10,221 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Nothing I'm really interested in post 1958 because of Lincoln wheat cents and actually Pre1948.
    Jim


    When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln

    Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.....Mark Twain
  • amwldcoinamwldcoin Posts: 11,269 ✭✭✭✭✭

    On a more serious note. I have always split my inventory into 2 sections. The 1st being what I consider type coins ending with Large Cents, 2 + 3 cents, Liberty Seated Design and Trade Dollars. The 2nd starts with Indian Cents, V-Nickels, Barbers, and Morgan Dollars.

  • coinhackcoinhack Posts: 1,164 ✭✭✭✭

    @PerryHall said:
    Age has nothing to do with it. I wouldn't consider a 2009 UHR Saint to be junk. I would consider a holed large cent to be junk.

    I agree. Modern does not have to be junk.

    Just as a little different perspective, I was looking at a dealer's site who sells French coins. Their inventory was in categories like Medieval, Early Kings, and then Modern coins. Modern coins were anything after 1799. Different frame of reference, I guess.

  • bolivarshagnastybolivarshagnasty Posts: 7,352 ✭✭✭✭✭

    All a matter of perspective. In 1909, Indians, Barbers, and Gold Libs were all modern junk.

  • crazyhounddogcrazyhounddog Posts: 14,011 ✭✭✭✭✭

    There is no junk in numismatics.
    But! If I HAD to call a date it would be just as soon as the mint took the humanity out of the making of the dies using computers to do everything . In my mind that’s when the BIG change happed.

    The bitterness of "Poor Quality" is remembered long after the sweetness of low price is forgotten.
  • BaleyBaley Posts: 22,663 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November 1, 2020 2:17PM

    Produced for circulation back before coins were widely "made for and marketed to collectors" Personally, my date is 1839, so about 180 years old.

    Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry

  • clarkbar04clarkbar04 Posts: 4,975 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Whenever it was they started using computers to design coins and all low relief.

    MS66 taste on an MS63 budget.
  • privatecoinprivatecoin Posts: 3,542 ✭✭✭✭✭

    1982.

    Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value. Zero. Voltaire. Ebay coinbowlllc

  • Batman23Batman23 Posts: 4,999 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @PerryHall said:

    @crazyhounddog said:
    There is no junk in numismatics.

    Have you seen some of the parking lot finds posted here? ;)

    Evidently he has not seen the vast majority of my hoard when sorted out by weight or volume... :s

  • BStrauss3BStrauss3 Posts: 3,590 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Used to be that you could get "Antique Plates" in NY for a car that was over 25 years old...

    -----Burton
    ANA 50 year/Life Member (now "Emeritus")
  • fathomfathom Posts: 1,796 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Besides the UHR's, other modern coins I love are the SSCA $50 gold slugs, Libertas Americana restrikes and the gold Buffalo bullion proof coins.

  • oldabeintxoldabeintx Posts: 2,244 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I wouldn't use the term "junk", but I too would use 1964 as the cutoff for "modern". I've used 2000 as the max for my type set though, but haven't included clad - perhaps I do view clad coinage as "junk", a bias I've carried ever since we debased our coins in 1965.

  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It is all a matter of perspective. Some collectors like modern coins, some collectors only like copper coins...There is no designated demarcation.... Collect what you like and enjoy the hobby - your collection, your coins. Cheers, RickO

  • badgerbadger Posts: 1,217 ✭✭✭

    Junk can come in any date. Would say Modern is post-1964. But could argue post-1945 too. Was trying to think of criteria for Modern vs Classic. Would say Modern is when a proof grades below PR70Dcam and falls off the pricing cliff. So grade is the primary driver.

    Classic would be where scarcity is the driver. A classic would catch bids at any grade and even no grades.

    Tough to define.

    Collector of Modern Silver Proofs 1950-1964 -- PCGS Registry as Elite Cameo

    Link to 1950 - 1964 Proof Registry Set
    1938 - 1964 Proof Jeffersons w/ Varieties
  • koynekwestkoynekwest Posts: 10,048 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Perhaps I shouldn't have used the word junk. I have amended that word with quotation marks.

  • calgolddivercalgolddiver Posts: 1,522 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @PerryHall said:

    @crazyhounddog said:
    There is no junk in numismatics.

    Have you seen some of the parking lot finds posted here? ;)

    I agree with the plethora of parking lot PMD ... now that's modern junk ... otherwise it's all good.

    Top 20 Type Set 1792 to present

    Top 10 Cal Fractional Type Set

    successful BST with Ankurj, BigAl, Bullsitter, CommemKing, DCW(7), Downtown1974, Elmerfusterpuck, Joelewis, Mach1ne, Minuteman810430, Modcrewman, Nankraut, Nederveit2, Philographer(5), Realgator, Silverpop, SurfinxHI, TomB and Yorkshireman(3)

  • TurtleCatTurtleCat Posts: 4,628 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I think for me it has to be something minted in the 1980s or before to not instantly think of it as modern.

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 35,366 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @PerryHall said:
    Age has nothing to do with it. I wouldn't consider a 2009 UHR Saint to be junk. I would consider a holed large cent to be junk.

    True, but a holed large cent wouldn't be "modern" junk. ;)

  • ZoinsZoins Posts: 34,394 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November 3, 2020 4:59AM

    @PerryHall said:
    Age has nothing to do with it. I wouldn't consider a 2009 UHR Saint to be junk. I would consider a holed large cent to be junk.

    But would you consider a holed UHR to be junk gold?

    @jmlanzaf said:
    True, but a holed large cent wouldn't be "modern" junk. ;)

    It could be for collectors of Roman Empire coins!

  • CoinscratchCoinscratch Posts: 9,140 ✭✭✭✭✭

    For me the cut off is 2019, I won’t even look at one of those or 2020 but 2018 now we’re talking.

  • PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 46,523 ✭✭✭✭✭

    There is desirable coins from every era and there is junk from every era. To give extreme examples, an ancient Roman bronze coin that's extremely corroded is junk while a 2020 cent struck over a 2020 dime is an extremely neat and desirable mint error coin.

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • NapNap Posts: 1,738 ✭✭✭✭✭
  • keetskeets Posts: 25,351 ✭✭✭✭✭

    the date where "Modern" begins is a moving line that tends to be defined by some sort of revolutionary change in design, production or alloy. for a long time that was 1965 when we moved away from Silver to CuNi while keeping the same designs and production methods. judging from the replies in this thread it seems that the next defined line for "Modern" will somehow be tied to production methods.

  • CoinscratchCoinscratch Posts: 9,140 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @PerryHall said:
    There is desirable coins from every era and there is junk from every era. To give extreme examples, an ancient Roman bronze coin that's extremely corroded is junk while a 2020 cent struck over a 2020 dime is an extremely neat and desirable mint error coin.

    Wait what? There’s already one of those?

  • messydeskmessydesk Posts: 20,105 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The correct term is Modern Crap™, because anything can be junk.

  • ZoinsZoins Posts: 34,394 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November 3, 2020 9:09AM

    What was the most modern coin Pogue had? I know he had a 1943-D Jefferson War Nickel I wanted but am not too sure past that.

  • Cougar1978Cougar1978 Posts: 8,542 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November 3, 2020 9:24AM

    No such thing modern junk. It all adds up.

    I don’t believe in date cutoffs lol especially if good profit potential. Many people collect by bd, anniversary date, theme, etc.

    Recently made many multiples x cost on mod scarce variety picked off from online (non bay) auc house.
    Modern junk? Ha ha am laughing all way to bank.

    Coins & Currency
  • OKbustchaserOKbustchaser Posts: 5,530 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Post 1836...If it was minted on a steam press...it's modern.

    Just because I'm old doesn't mean I don't love to look at a pretty bust.
  • CalifornianKingCalifornianKing Posts: 1,259 ✭✭✭✭

    Post 1964 I don't collect really..

  • MsMorrisineMsMorrisine Posts: 34,032 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November 4, 2020 10:55AM

    hmmmm
    1970 and before for half dollars
    1958 and before for cents
    1964 and before dimes and quarters
    nickels? 1963?
    1935 and before for dollars
    1933 and before for gold
    1954 and before for commemoratives
    any half dime & any half cent & any 20 cents

    worthy?

    Current maintainer of Stone's Master List of Favorite Websites // My BST transactions

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file