H
SeattleSlammer
Posts: 10,082 ✭✭✭✭✭
Gy
12
SeattleSlammer
Posts: 10,082 ✭✭✭✭✭
SeattleSlammer
Posts: 10,082 ✭✭✭✭✭
Comments
55?
Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍
My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):
https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/
Agree 55.
yup first impression, 55 and gorgeous!
au55
53
Beautiful coin! Due to the wear particularly on the cheek, breast line, hair and cap on the obverse, the wear on the eagles toes, the top of his head and wing feathers, I would say AU50 at best. Possibly high XF.
Au 55
53
Whatever the grade is I’d just like say say I think it looks great.
55 was myfirst impression. Looks great!
Nice coin.
Absolutely lovely example ... I'll going to guess it's in an AU53 holder, although that is kind of secondary
“We are only their care-takers,” he posed, “if we take good care of them, then centuries from now they may still be here … ”
Todd - BHNC #242
53? Not sure.
Beautiful. Damn sure.
"If I say something in the woods and my wife isn't there to hear it.....am I still wrong?"
My Washington Quarter Registry set...in progress
H
Pretty coin and a definite gold bean candidate.
How did it ever grade 40? I wasn't even thinking about ANYTHING below AU 50. That was my absolute floor! It deserves two Gold stickers LOL. I love the color and the OGH, by the way. I think the folks at CAC would love that piece, too... Send it in!
Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍
My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):
https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/
I would love to get that one for XF money.
You beat me to this one. I contacted the dealer and they said they had just sold it. Congrats! Definitely under graded.
I didn't get a chance to guess but I would say that is a solid 45/50. In spite of the reverse drift mark it should certainly earn a gold sticker.
FWIW, here's an AU50 of mine...same die marriage but an earlier die state before the "patched 3".
Lance.
@lkeigwin nice Broken 3 ⭐️
WOW ... 40 just doesn't seem right on that one. 50. Yeah, okay. Hopefully the grade worked in your favor on the pricing. It's a really good looking coin.
Killer Broken 3 Lance!
“We are only their care-takers,” he posed, “if we take good care of them, then centuries from now they may still be here … ”
Todd - BHNC #242
I hope I didn't offend. Posting your coin to someone else's thread is not cool. I just meant to show how OP's coin is so close to AU50 or better.
Lance.
no offense at all Lance! post ‘em if you got ‘em is what I say
Base on what is shown by Lance's example, it's a 50, 45 worst case. Agree with the gold bean.
Very nice Patched 3 SS
I see that coin as a 50-53 all day long.
Too much wear for a 55 but not worn past an AU coin.
Gold bean it for max value but anyone buying that coin can see it was not correctly graded.
Wow... nice coin... late to the game, was going to say 50-53 though....surprised at 40. Cheers, RickO
Perhaps correctly graded based upon the standard at that time.
Beautiful coin. Love the patched 3!
"She comes out of the sun in a silk dress,
running like a water color in the rain...."
wow good looking coin
55
I always post my GTG before reading the thread's posts.
Wow we, you have an undergraded coin you have.
Perhaps not, based on the standard at the time.😉 Unless it has a hidden problem, for which it was downgraded.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
Back then, did they net for drift marks? Great coin and certainly looks AU
I basically paid XF40 guide for it. That seemed reasonable given its super eye appeal, OGH, and undergraded look. Coinfacts shows another XF40 selling recently (735), just under guide, as well as sales for XF45 (900 in Feb.), and AU50 (1000 in Dec.) — all non-CAC sales.