Home› U.S. Coin Forum

GTG on this Morgan 1890-CC

marcmoishmarcmoish Posts: 6,677 ✭✭✭✭✭
in U.S. Coin Forum

«1

Comments

  • morgandollar1878morgandollar1878 Posts: 4,006 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Nice CC, looks like a 63.

    Instagram: nomad_numismatics
  • JimnightJimnight Posts: 10,846 ✭✭✭✭✭

    66

  • SmudgeSmudge Posts: 9,822 ✭✭✭✭✭

    64-65. The cheek dings hurt, but it is very nice overall.

  • blitzdudeblitzdude Posts: 6,586 ✭✭✭✭✭

    64, shame about the obverse because that reverse is 65 possibly 66 even with the nasty. Congrats!

    The whole worlds off its rocker, buy Gold™.
    BOOMIN!™
    Wooooha! Did someone just say it's officially "TACO™" Tuesday????

  • gripgrip Posts: 9,962 ✭✭✭✭✭

    A agree with smudge

  • skier07skier07 Posts: 4,379 ✭✭✭✭✭

    64 perhaps 65 because of eye appeal

  • jughead1893jughead1893 Posts: 1,776 ✭✭✭✭✭

    64

  • AUandAGAUandAG Posts: 24,936 ✭✭✭✭✭

    63

    Registry: CC lowballs (boblindstrom), bobinvegas1989@yahoo.com
  • bearcavebearcave Posts: 3,996 ✭✭✭✭✭

    65

    Ken
  • tommy44tommy44 Posts: 2,319 ✭✭✭✭✭

    63 with a shot at 64 because of the toning. I like it a lot.

    it's crackers to slip a rozzer the dropsy in snide

  • bearcavebearcave Posts: 3,996 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I went for the toning! 63 maybe a 64 without the toning because of the hits you pointed out.

    Ken
  • CoinJunkieCoinJunkie Posts: 8,772 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I know the grade, and will only say PCGS assigned it pretty much what I would have. Nice-looking coin.

    My Roosevelt Dime Registry Set
  • HighReliefHighRelief Posts: 3,720 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I am thinking 64

  • 50cCOMMEMGUY50cCOMMEMGUY Posts: 211 ✭✭✭

    64

    "Today the crumbs, tomorrow the
    loaf. Perhaps someday the whole damn boulangerie." - fictional Jack Rackham

  • WDHWDH Posts: 165 ✭✭✭

    63

  • SimpleCollectorSimpleCollector Posts: 536 ✭✭✭✭✭

    64

  • KliaoKliao Posts: 5,694 ✭✭✭✭✭

    64

    Collector
    91 Positive BST transactions buying and selling with 56 members and counting!
    instagram.com/klnumismatics

  • bearcavebearcave Posts: 3,996 ✭✭✭✭✭

    :D

    Ken
  • coin4salecoin4sale Posts: 375 ✭✭✭

    63+ former Redfield hoard?

    BT&C
  • ironmanl63ironmanl63 Posts: 1,974 ✭✭✭✭✭

    64.

  • Tom147Tom147 Posts: 1,485 ✭✭✭✭✭

    63

  • marcmoishmarcmoish Posts: 6,677 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MFeld said:
    My guess is MS63. I’m shocked by any guesses higher than 64, based on Liberty’s cheek, jaw and neck.

    Hey Mark - such comments can be placed after the grade is revealed.

    You just shot it.

    The point of a GTG is to get as many real guesses without comments (yours being professional no less) of shock or disdain for a honest guess.

    I'll reveal it sooner as no need to stall on this one further any longer.

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 14,884 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @marcmoish said:

    @MFeld said:
    My guess is MS63. I’m shocked by any guesses higher than 64, based on Liberty’s cheek, jaw and neck.

    Hey Mark - such comments can be placed after the grade is revealed.

    You just shot it.

    The point of a GTG is to get as many real guesses without comments (yours being professional no less) of shock or disdain for a honest guess.

    I'll reveal it sooner as no need to stall on this one further any longer.

    I apologize if that bothered you. I will say that when I’ve made similar comments in other threads, I haven’t noticed any effect on others’ posting widely different opinions from mine.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • kazkaz Posts: 9,276 ✭✭✭✭✭

    My guess is 64. Nice toning.

  • TheRavenTheRaven Posts: 4,148 ✭✭✭✭

    64

    Collection under construction: VG Barber Quarters & Halves
  • TheRavenTheRaven Posts: 4,148 ✭✭✭✭

    64

    Collection under construction: VG Barber Quarters & Halves
  • amwldcoinamwldcoin Posts: 11,269 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I'm at 63 with a possible color bump to 64.

  • android01android01 Posts: 306 ✭✭✭✭✭

    64

  • marcmoishmarcmoish Posts: 6,677 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MFeld said:

    @marcmoish said:

    @MFeld said:
    My guess is MS63. I’m shocked by any guesses higher than 64, based on Liberty’s cheek, jaw and neck.

    Hey Mark - such comments can be placed after the grade is revealed.

    You just shot it.

    The point of a GTG is to get as many real guesses without comments (yours being professional no less) of shock or disdain for a honest guess.

    I'll reveal it sooner as no need to stall on this one further any longer.

    I apologize if that bothered you. I will say that when I’ve made similar comments in other threads, I haven’t noticed any effect on others’ posting widely different opinions from mine.

    many look up to folks as yourself - and that can easily sway opinion, Peers can sway , I prefer knowing what actual personal opinion is not once other grades are figured in. I've always done that, some I was way off and some high - I don't care, it is my personal opinion of how I see it. But ye no worries apology accepted ;)

  • 50cCOMMEMGUY50cCOMMEMGUY Posts: 211 ✭✭✭

    @marcmoish said:

    @MFeld said:
    My guess is MS63. I’m shocked by any guesses higher than 64, based on Liberty’s cheek, jaw and neck.

    Hey Mark - such comments can be placed after the grade is revealed.

    You just shot it.

    The point of a GTG is to get as many real guesses without comments (yours being professional no less) of shock or disdain for a honest guess.

    I'll reveal it sooner as no need to stall on this one further any longer.

    Mark you are a terrible person and I hope you feel great shame 😂😂😂😉😉😉

    "Today the crumbs, tomorrow the
    loaf. Perhaps someday the whole damn boulangerie." - fictional Jack Rackham

  • No HeadlightsNo Headlights Posts: 2,105 ✭✭✭✭✭

    63+

  • relicsncoinsrelicsncoins Posts: 8,107 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I'm in the 63+ camp.

    Need a Barber Half with ANACS photo certificate. If you have one for sale please PM me. Current Ebay auctions
  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
  • marcmoishmarcmoish Posts: 6,677 ✭✭✭✭✭

    63+

    Thanks all !

  • ChrisH821ChrisH821 Posts: 6,740 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I like it as a 3, 3+ makes perfect sense to me.

    Collector, occasional seller

  • metalmeistermetalmeister Posts: 4,596 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Fair grade IMHO. A clean cheek would be 66. Still beautiful.

    email: ccacollectibles@yahoo.com

    100% Positive BST transactions
  • CoinJunkieCoinJunkie Posts: 8,772 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited March 22, 2020 6:51PM

    @metalmeister said:
    Fair grade IMHO. A clean cheek would be 66. Still beautiful.

    I don't think it has enough blast for a 66 grade. If if did, those would be about $35k worth of marks on the face. :o

    My Roosevelt Dime Registry Set
  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 14,884 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited March 22, 2020 7:08PM

    @CoinJunkie said:

    @metalmeister said:
    Fair grade IMHO. A clean cheek would be 66. Still beautiful.

    I don't think it has enough blast for a 66 grade. If if did, those would be about $35k worth of marks on the face. :o

    I see no meaningful deficiency with the “blast”. However, a multitude of coins graded lower than 66 would be transformed into 66’s (or higher) if their flaws were somehow, no longer present. 😉So I don’t really understand the point.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • CoinJunkieCoinJunkie Posts: 8,772 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MFeld said:

    @CoinJunkie said:

    @metalmeister said:
    Fair grade IMHO. A clean cheek would be 66. Still beautiful.

    I don't think it has enough blast for a 66 grade. If if did, those would be about $35k worth of marks on the face. :o

    I see no meaningful deficiency with the “blast”. However, a multitude of coins graded lower than 66 would be transformed into 66’s (or higher) if their flaws were somehow, no longer present. 😉So I don’t really understand the point.

    OK, I'll defer to you on the luster. Just noting that depending on the coin, marks on the portrait can be more or less expensive. There really wasn't much of a point, but when did that become a criterion for posting here...? ;)

    My Roosevelt Dime Registry Set
  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 14,884 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @CoinJunkie said:

    @MFeld said:

    @CoinJunkie said:

    @metalmeister said:
    Fair grade IMHO. A clean cheek would be 66. Still beautiful.

    I don't think it has enough blast for a 66 grade. If if did, those would be about $35k worth of marks on the face. :o

    I see no meaningful deficiency with the “blast”. However, a multitude of coins graded lower than 66 would be transformed into 66’s (or higher) if their flaws were somehow, no longer present. 😉So I don’t really understand the point.

    OK, I'll defer to you on the luster. Just noting that depending on the coin, marks on the portrait can be more or less expensive. There really wasn't much of a point, but when did that become a criterion for posting here...? ;)

    Sorry for the confusion. My comment about not seeing the point was with regard to the previous post:

    “Fair grade IMHO. A clean cheek would be 66. Still beautiful.”

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • 50cCOMMEMGUY50cCOMMEMGUY Posts: 211 ✭✭✭

    63+ = yeah I could totally see that.

    "Today the crumbs, tomorrow the
    loaf. Perhaps someday the whole damn boulangerie." - fictional Jack Rackham

  • DelawareDoonsDelawareDoons Posts: 3,413 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Too nice for a 3, not nice enough for a 4. I was at 3+. Nice example.

    "It's like God, Family, Country, except Sticker, Plastic, Coin."

  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I would have guessed 64....but that was mainly influenced by the reverse... I should not let that happen, but I like the Morgan reverse...Cheers, RickO

  • marcmoishmarcmoish Posts: 6,677 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Realone said:
    I thought this was a GTG on a nice Morgan. Mark played your game like the rest of the members. OP takes these games way too seriously imho.

    agreed, I got carried away - the times have some of us somewhat frazzled a tad.

  • marcmoishmarcmoish Posts: 6,677 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @ricko said:
    I would have guessed 64....but that was mainly influenced by the reverse... I should not let that happen, but I like the Morgan reverse...Cheers, RickO

    oh my, am I detecting a slight shift here into the toneside?

    albeit subtle, this is huge!

  • marcmoishmarcmoish Posts: 6,677 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @coin4sale said:
    63+ former Redfield hoard?

    I am not sure, but I don't think so.

  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @marcmoish.... :D Not at all...I was referring to the quality of the strike and clean mirrors...Tarnish turns me off... Cheers, RickO

  • marcmoishmarcmoish Posts: 6,677 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @ricko said:
    @marcmoish.... :D Not at all...I was referring to the quality of the strike and clean mirrors...Tarnish turns me off... Cheers, RickO

    sorry you can't backtrack now, you in denial phase. Its OK, we should be talking about this. I can help.

  • CoinJunkieCoinJunkie Posts: 8,772 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @marcmoish said:

    @ricko said:
    @marcmoish.... :D Not at all...I was referring to the quality of the strike and clean mirrors...Tarnish turns me off... Cheers, RickO

    sorry you can't backtrack now, you in denial phase. Its OK, we should be talking about this. I can help.

    Save your energy. RickO is beyond help. B)>:)

    My Roosevelt Dime Registry Set

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Format
SpoilerCodeQuote
Heading 2Heading 1
Emoji
:):D:(;):/:o:s:p:'(:|B):#:*<3o:)>:)
Url
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file
Home • U.S. Coin ForumComment As ...