@LindeDad said:
Something seems a little off to me?
Perhaps it is the shape of the numerals in the date.
Yes, and the rims look strange too, as well as the color - the portrait looks spot on though, as does the reverse, but the ribbon looks like it didn't 'transfer' well.
Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
It’s obviously a new Newcomb number, recently discovered.
Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
@LindeDad said:
Something seems a little off to me?
Perhaps it is the shape of the numerals in the date.
and like we've discussed before, this obv/rev die combo was probably used with several other dates. imo, i think this because the date style/surfaces don't match the rest of the coin indicating punching of the date at a separate time than the rest of the coin.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
Comments
Thanks for posting but no laughing matter! Fakes as this fool many collectors.
The rims look a little...off???
Something seems a little off to me?
Perhaps it is the shape of the numerals in the date.
Yes, and the rims look strange too, as well as the color - the portrait looks spot on though, as does the reverse, but the ribbon looks like it didn't 'transfer' well.
Also uneven denticles, some of the letters are very poorly executed, the wreath looks a bit mushy, hair not quite right,...
RMR: 'Wer, wenn ich schriee, hörte mich denn aus der Engel Ordnungen?'
CJ: 'No one!' [Ain't no angels in the coin biz]
FWIW, it won't bean, send it back.
JMHO
I thought the thread was going to be about an altered E.
My YouTube Channel
The date placement looks off... in a real 1852, the 85 nearly touch the lower braid... at least on the Coinfacts page.
https://www.pcgs.com/coinfacts/coin/1852-1c-bn/1898
Successful BST transactions with: SilverEagles92; Ahrensdad; Smitty; GregHansen; Lablade; Mercury10c; copperflopper; whatsup; KISHU1; scrapman1077, crispy, canadanz, smallchange, robkool, Mission16, ranshdow, ibzman350, Fallguy, Collectorcoins, SurfinxHI, jwitten, Walkerguy21D, dsessom.
Run away.... Must have left China before the virus hit....Drop it in alcohol to decontaminate it...
Cheers, RickO
Pass ☠
Where's the CC mint mark?
It’s obviously a new Newcomb number, recently discovered.
and like we've discussed before, this obv/rev die combo was probably used with several other dates. imo, i think this because the date style/surfaces don't match the rest of the coin indicating punching of the date at a separate time than the rest of the coin.
have a good weekend!
.
That one woulda gotten me if I'd had a beer or two (I don't drink).
At least until I saw the date numerals.
For me, fonts and numerals are almost always the first pickup points that trigger the red flags.
CC for the Chi Com mint?
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire