Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

My early (1916-33) circulated Walker set - almost complete!

ElmerFusterpuckElmerFusterpuck Posts: 4,780 ✭✭✭✭✭
edited November 26, 2019 9:54PM in U.S. Coin Forum

It's just lacking both of the 1917-S issues. I've just missed out on a couple of the obverse pieces, the "common date" reverse in XF has been a bear and a half to find and still no luck. It's still been an enjoyable set to put together though; the early dates are pretty tough to find in decent shape in VF or XF, especially uncleaned.

Question for registry participants - why is the 1933-S in the early and the later sets?

The set, all pieces are graded from VF-20 to XF-45 (edited from the earlier posting to add the 33-S reverse):

Comments

  • mvs7mvs7 Posts: 1,662 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Nice job! I love evenly matched circulated sets like this one; definitely shows a lot of patience not to cut corners when building a great set.

  • crazyhounddogcrazyhounddog Posts: 14,043 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Great job!
    Congratulations 👍

    The bitterness of "Poor Quality" is remembered long after the sweetness of low price is forgotten.
  • koynekwestkoynekwest Posts: 10,048 ✭✭✭✭✭

    That's a very attractive circulated set!

  • That's a nice set! When I put together a full set, it took a long time to find a 1916-S obv with a legible mint mark. Maybe it was just bad luck, but I looked at several with a mint mark that was a splotch that could have been a D, an S, or some other letter. I don't recall having a problem with either of the 1917-S varieties.

  • bearcavebearcave Posts: 3,996 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Those are some nice walkers!!!

    Ken
  • MeltdownMeltdown Posts: 8,933 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Dang. Those look great all together like that. I've got an album set going but mostly pulled from 90%, most not nearly as meaty as those.

  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    That is a really great set of beautiful WLH's....Well done indeed!! Cheers, RickO

  • Walkerguy21DWalkerguy21D Posts: 11,635 ✭✭✭✭✭

    A truly beautiful set, and a difficult set to assemble.
    Well done!

    Successful BST transactions with 171 members. Ebeneezer, Tonedeaf, Shane6596, Piano1, Ikenefic, RG, PCGSPhoto, stman, Don'tTelltheWife, Boosibri, Ron1968, snowequities, VTchaser, jrt103, SurfinxHI, 78saen, bp777, FHC, RYK, JTHawaii, Opportunity, Kliao, bigtime36, skanderbeg, split37, thebigeng, acloco, Toninginthblood, OKCC, braddick, Coinflip, robcool, fastfreddie, tightbudget, DBSTrader2, nickelsciolist, relaxn, Eagle eye, soldi, silverman68, ElKevvo, sawyerjosh, Schmitz7, talkingwalnut2, konsole, sharkman987, sniocsu, comma, jesbroken, David1234, biosolar, Sullykerry, Moldnut, erwindoc, MichaelDixon, GotTheBug
  • WalkerfanWalkerfan Posts: 9,670 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November 22, 2019 2:55PM

    You just got a love that set!!

    Early walkers are very challenging in XF through AU grades! Very low pops!!

    I think that the 1917 S reverse is tough to find nice, in any grade, as it took forever to find an acceptable 64 for my set.

    I have no idea why the 1933 S is included in the intermediate set. I don’t believe that it should be, because it is technically an early walker and is represented in that set, as well, so it is redundant.

    The 1933-S usually comes well struck but is very tough to find with clean surfaces. That’s why gems are so pricey and scarce.

    Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍

    My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):

    https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/

  • HemisphericalHemispherical Posts: 9,370 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Congrats @ElmerFusterpuck!

  • shorecollshorecoll Posts: 5,447 ✭✭✭✭✭

    That's one of my slow motion working sets...I like yours.

    ANA-LM, NBS, EAC

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file