Does this reverse hurt the grade? If it doe, how much?
Collect4fun
Posts: 85 ✭✭✭
1
Collect4fun
Posts: 85 ✭✭✭
Comments
Not much ...
The coin is only a strong MS-63 or weak 64 and the reverse is consistent with that. Some might disagree, but the dulling on the reverse is consistent with a 140 year old coin with original surfaces.
It's not too distracting.
Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍
My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):
https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/
I don't see any problems!
My Original Song Written to my late wife-"Plus other original music by me"
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL8A11CC8CC6093D80
https://n1m.com/bobbysmith1
I personally like the album toning. To me it frames the coin. I wish the reverse mimicked the obverse.
That's a nice strike for the date!
If “Doe”, how much.
About a “Buck”. 🤪
A: The year they spend more on their library than their coin collection.
A numismatist is judged more on the content of their library than the content of their cabinet.
64, personally I would of dipped out the nasty on the obverse before sending her in. Congrats!
The whole worlds off its rocker, buy Gold™.
BOOMIN!™
Wooooha! Did someone just say it's officially "TACO™" Tuesday????
Being a 63/64 coin, I would say the reverse does not really impact the grade....Cheers, RickO
If PCGS graded it lower than 63 I think you could say that "Yes" it was effected by the reverse. "Should" it have been? That is where the discussion would start. 79-O was the first Morgan I looked for after reading Mr Bowers Red Book on Morgans way back when. Super tough date. I personally like this coin and the contrast. I can see why others may not though. When do we get the grade reveal?
I think you did well! Congrats on a really interesting 79-O!
No, not anymore than the OBV. A 64 is on the generous side overall.