Do you consider a coin a monster based on color or grade as well?

Options

I have always considered a monster to be a combination of color and grade... however I have heard of a differing opinion that it is only based on color. Personally I am torn however when I see a coin such as the one below an ms62 I have a hard time believing its a monster. An ms63 maybe if the color is nice I typically think ms64 and above plus color for it to be a monster. Maybe I'm mistaken. Do you think this ms62 is a monster?
https://www.ebay.com/itm/1880-S-MORGAN-DOLLAR-PCGS-MS-62-AMAZING-MONSTER-TONED-OBVERSE/254388420462?hash=item3b3abb3f6e%3Ag%3AtYMAAOSwvb5dfbCR&LH_Auction=1

Comments

  • JBK
    JBK Posts: 17,860 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Personally, I hate the term "monster" (most often seen as "monster toned") when used to describe a coin.

    To me it is just hype, and for me it usually makes me lose interest. Quality does not need to be hyped.

  • 291fifth
    291fifth Posts: 25,218 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    The term is pure sales hype and should be ignored.

    All glory is fleeting.
  • MFeld
    MFeld Posts: 17,131 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 18, 2019 1:46PM
    Options

    If it’s a “monster”, obviously that’s just in terms of color, but not quality. I feel that many of us think or worry far too much about labels - especially considering that they mean different things to different people.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • coinbuf
    coinbuf Posts: 12,564 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    The term is silly imo, most that I've seen posted with that moniker are cartoonish and garish. Not my cup of tea.

    My Lincoln Registry
    My Collection of Old Holders

    Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
  • ricko
    ricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    If I see (or hear) the term 'monster'...I just move on....If I wanted tarnished silver, I would do it myself. A lot cheaper. ;) Cheers, RickO

  • Nic
    Nic Posts: 3,438 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @MFeld said:
    If it’s a “monster”, obviously that’s just in terms of color, but not quality. I feel that many of us think or worry far too much about labels - especially considering that they mean different things to different people.

    He wants a Moose.

  • topstuf
    topstuf Posts: 14,803 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 18, 2019 3:02PM
    Options

    @MFeld said:
    If it’s a “monster”, obviously that’s just in terms of color, but not quality. I feel that many of us think or worry far too much about labels - especially considering that they mean different things to different people.

    >

  • FullHorn
    FullHorn Posts: 1,168 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    A few months back some one here posed the question (maybe the OP?) " Do you consider this coin a Monster?"

    I thought it was a joke and answered "Yes". To my surprise many answered and discussed why it didn't qualify as one.

    I thought most here would be above such nonsense as to having a "Monster coin threshold". I was wrong. Apparently

    you cant just run around tossing out terms like "Monster" or "fresh" without understanding the collecting communities

    commonly accepted guidelines.

  • MasonG
    MasonG Posts: 7,566 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 18, 2019 4:58PM
    Options

    Monster = Marketing

    Not that there's anything wrong with that, if that's what you're into.

  • Cougar1978
    Cougar1978 Posts: 10,067 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    I prefer the term PQ. Not a toner fan - coins wellstruck super luster some lt gold may be ok. NO black spots or dark toning or that run over by truck look. PQ material are the top sellers. Many describe coins as original bc these have average to below average luster lol.

    Investor
  • Graham
    Graham Posts: 57 ✭✭
    Options

    I owned and flipped this coin years ago and while neat, it's not what I would consider a monster. The word is thrown around on ebay a ton and this is pretty much the equivalent of youtube clickbate for the ebay coin world. Trust your eyes, if you have to ask if it's a monster, chances are it's not.

    .
  • Zoins
    Zoins Posts: 34,489 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    You got me to look :)

    At least it doesn’t ask you to L@@K!

  • privatecoin
    privatecoin Posts: 3,853 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    I consider a coin a monster if it is more than I can afford

    Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value. Zero. Voltaire. Ebay coinbowlllc

  • morgandollar1878
    morgandollar1878 Posts: 4,006 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    No I don't think the Morgan in question is "Monster" toned. Like a few others have mentioned, it is an over used term. It is overused even more on ebay to get views.

    Instagram: nomad_numismatics
  • RockyMtnProspector
    RockyMtnProspector Posts: 754 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Monstrously toned, maybe.

    GSAs, OBW rolls, Seated, Walkers. Anything old and Colorado-focused, CO nationals.



    Gonna get me a $50 Octagonal someday. Some. Day.
  • lcoopie
    lcoopie Posts: 8,875 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    It depends on who is claiming monster.

    LCoopie = Les
  • DiggerJim
    DiggerJim Posts: 517 ✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @ricko said:
    If I see (or hear) the term 'monster'...I just move on....If I wanted tarnished silver, I would do it myself. A lot cheaper. ;) Cheers, RickO

    I am in the same camp as @ricko

    But I do understand why they call it a monster. It’s because they’re “Scary Ugly”

    Just my opinion of course.

    DiggerJim

    BST transactions - mach1ne - Ronyahski - pitboss (x2) - Bigbuck1975 (x2) - jimineez1 - nk1nk - bidask - WaterSport - logger7 - SurfinxHI (x2) - Smittys - Bennybravo - Proofcollector - Splitaces (x4) - onlyrooosies

  • topstuf
    topstuf Posts: 14,803 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Is "monster" like "noice?" :p

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file