Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

New discovery. What to do now?

InfamustrueerrorsInfamustrueerrors Posts: 99
edited September 21, 2019 3:55PM in U.S. Coin Forum

I have found a unique (as far as now) 1982 D copper one cent penny small date under a large date.i haven't even heard of anything like that.i know this sounds like BS but is REAL.IT looks like a small date but in angles you can see the large date,also the mixed in numbers in the date are visible (even tho my camera takes low quality photos) the D mint mark is doubled as well.amazing found I'm glad I decided to go through my collections.by the way this is the first forum to know about it...let me know your thoughts.

Answers

  • InfamustrueerrorsInfamustrueerrors Posts: 99
    edited September 21, 2019 3:57PM

  • InfamustrueerrorsInfamustrueerrors Posts: 99
    edited September 21, 2019 3:58PM

    "")

  • @MFeld said:
    No matter how much you might wish otherwise, it appears that you have a large date example.

    With the small date under the large date,or what is the little curb on the right side of the middle of the 2,and the second marks in the ends of the 9,and the doubling of the 8?

  • DIMEMANDIMEMAN Posts: 22,403 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I don't see any doubling. Some MD on the MM.

  • BoosibriBoosibri Posts: 12,395 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MFeld said:
    No matter how much you might wish otherwise, it appears that you have a large date example.

    This

  • InfamustrueerrorsInfamustrueerrors Posts: 99
    edited September 21, 2019 3:42PM

    @MFeld I apologise for the quality of the pictures,I'm trying to get a better device to get clear ones.How is this not a small date ? in this angle the outlines are a little more visible also the the small date 9 and better doubling on the 8 and the outline of the two number "2" mixed together

    and the little curb on the bottom left of the number 2.

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 14,835 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Infamustrueerrors said:

    @MFeld said:
    No matter how much you might wish otherwise, it appears that you have a large date example.

    With the small date under the large date,or what is the little curb on the right side of the middle of the 2,and the second marks in the ends of the 9,and the doubling of the 8?

    I don’t know, but those particulars don’t lead any credence to the presence of a “small date” there. I believe you’re simply seeing what you want to see and that if a small date were common, you wouldn't be “seeing” it as you do now.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • @MFeld said:

    @Infamustrueerrors said:

    @MFeld said:
    No matter how much you might wish otherwise, it appears that you have a large date example.

    I don’t know, but those particulars don’t lead any credence to the presence of a “small date” there. I believe you’re simply seeing what you want to see and that if a small date were common, you wouldn't be “seeing” it as you do now.

    I didn't get the last part
    "that if a small date were common, you wouldn't be “seeing” it as you do now"
    Small date is very rare,and if this is a small date under a large date will make it the first one.i do see a small date and I want to see it as well,and I want people to see it too,to know if someone else see what I see.

  • djmdjm Posts: 1,565 ✭✭✭✭✭

    If you believe this is a real discovery you should contact CONECA and have them evaluate the coin. Their website is conecaonline.org. You should be able to get contact information and they can tell you how to submit the con for a determination.

  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It looks like there is some die wear and machine doubling... Please send it to CONECA for a final disposition. Cheers, RickO

  • OldhoopsterOldhoopster Posts: 2,930 ✭✭✭✭✭

    When you posted this same coin on another forum, collectors including Fred Weinberg responded that it was not an error. Did you not agree with Mr Weinberg's comments?

    Member of the ANA since 1982
  • @Oldhoopster said:
    When you posted this same coin on another forum, collectors including Fred Weinberg responded that it was not an error. Did you not agree with Mr Weinberg's comments?

    I don't know why you are using other people's names for false statements...this is the first and only forum I posted this coin to.i hope you are just confused and not using names in vain or putting words on people's mouths...I would love anyone to comment on this coin in this pictures,the more feedback I get the better.

  • goldengolden Posts: 9,991 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Nothing to see here. Move on.

  • JBKJBK Posts: 16,380 ✭✭✭✭✭

    :s

  • lonn47lonn47 Posts: 236 ✭✭✭

    get it graded,

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file