I think the lister tried to "sell similar" someone else's auction. If you look at all his other coins, they all have wrong information in the Item Specifics.
It's not even a 1943-D He probably doesn't even know what "ANACS" means.
All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.
Comments
I think the OP means the condition of the coin and its description of it.
One doesn't.
reported.
No big deal
All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.
I'm sure @Realone was kidding
All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.
unreal
Someone did. Must want a pocket piece.
To be fair, it could be a picture mix-up. Although based on the other offerings...
All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.
That ANACS holder will someday be collectible.
Generation invisible
All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.
I think the lister tried to "sell similar" someone else's auction. If you look at all his other coins, they all have wrong information in the Item Specifics.
It's not even a 1943-D He probably doesn't even know what "ANACS" means.
All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.
Reported.
The Buyer would have lost more money buying an actual holdered MS64 coin. I thought grading was subjective?
The seller called it a D... however, I saw no mint mark.... oh well, gone now. Cheers, RickO
seller has a 80 percent feedback rating, a real winner
Humm? Let's see. No slab in sight, a coin grading fine on a good day, a feedback rating of 3 and a satisfaction rating of 80%. Sure, why not?
From the sellers lists of items being sold: