Options
Isabella GtG revealed
cheezhed
Posts: 6,444 ✭✭✭✭✭



Many happy BST transactions
3
cheezhed
Posts: 6,444 ✭✭✭✭✭



Comments
I'll give it a 65 despite the scratch near the chin. Nice coin!
carolinacollectorcoins.com
64.5
64
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
I'll wager a 64
Looks like a 63
Wow, it's trending down! I'd be delighted to pay 63 money for that coin!
Let me change the direction, and guess MS65.
Tough issue to grade from a pic as many are plagued with hairlines from having been mishandled.
They look good straight on, but quickly KAPOW (think Batman) change with a slight tilt under a light source.
No light tricks here.
64 ....I like it
65 beautiful coin
Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value. Zero. Voltaire. Ebay coinbowlllc
64
I would be surprised if it wasn’t a 64
m
Fellas, leave the tight pants to the ladies. If I can count the coins in your pockets you better use them to call a tailor. Stay thirsty my friends......
64+
64
I'm with @cameonut2011 at 64+.
I would guess 64.... at first thought 65, but looked closer and think the 64 would be the slab grade. Cheers, RickO
64+
62, sorry but I think they are hard on this issue.
I'll reveal in a few more hours.
MS-63. Isabella's cheek and the left field on the reverse lower the grade for me. In addition it has been dipped.
I am in the 64 group.
MS63. I agree with @BillJones analysis: The cheek looks a little too rough and there may be some small diagonal scratches, mainly on the left reverse field.
Agree with the dip. It looks a little "off" to me, note the dirt around the date.
MS 62+
MS64. Nice one!
Nice looking 62! You should send it to CAC

m
Fellas, leave the tight pants to the ladies. If I can count the coins in your pockets you better use them to call a tailor. Stay thirsty my friends......
I have seen OGH coins before but I don't remember that particular shade of green. Does anyone know what generation/years it was used?
I'm thinking it's just the photo or some fading of the label. It looks to be the most common of the OGH (3.1 per PCGS Museum of Holders and 5.0 per Conder101) that was used from 1993-1998.
https://www.pcgs.com/holders/Gen3.1
https://forums.collectors.com/discussion/918775/pcgs-generations-an-attempted-update-slowly-being-updated-8-17