Home› U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Guess the Grade Trade Dollar Version {Grades revealed}

U1chicagoU1chicago Posts: 7,004 ✭✭✭✭✭
edited June 24, 2019 7:07PM in U.S. Coin Forum

Please guess the grade of each.
If you'd like, please also guess which one sold for more.

1

2

Comments

  • Options
    tradedollarnuttradedollarnut Posts: 20,786 ✭✭✭✭✭
  • Options
    AUandAGAUandAG Posts: 25,052 ✭✭✭✭✭

    58/62

    Registry: CC lowballs (boblindstrom), bobinvegas1989@yahoo.com
  • Options
    SimpleCollectorSimpleCollector Posts: 536 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Going 63 on number 2 and that is the one that sold for more

  • Options
    shishshish Posts: 1,224 ✭✭✭✭✭

    61/63 number 2 sold for more.

    Liberty Seated and Trade Dollar Specialist
  • Options
    rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    60/63......No guess on sales....weird things happen in auctions... Cheers, RickO

  • Options
    MrBlusterMrBluster Posts: 380 ✭✭✭

    55/62 Higher price paid for the 1873

  • Options
    U1chicagoU1chicago Posts: 7,004 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MrBluster said:
    55/62 Higher price paid for the 1873

    Note: they are both 1878

  • Options
    lonn47lonn47 Posts: 236 ✭✭✭

    64/62 1873 paid the most

  • Options
    U1chicagoU1chicago Posts: 7,004 ✭✭✭✭✭

    For all those guessing, there is no 1873. Both coins are dated 1878.

  • Options
    Batman23Batman23 Posts: 5,519 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I'm thinking AU58 on both but the reverse on #2 looks MS. I would pay more for #2.

  • Options
    HighReliefHighRelief Posts: 3,729 ✭✭✭✭✭

    55/58 and the second one was more costly.

  • Options
    MFeldMFeld Posts: 17,207 ✭✭✭✭✭

    58/62

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • Options
    cameonut2011cameonut2011 Posts: 10,999 ✭✭✭✭✭

    58
    58+

  • Options
    U1chicagoU1chicago Posts: 7,004 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Some are close...I’ll reveal later tonight

  • Options
    StuartStuart Posts: 9,831 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited June 24, 2019 5:26PM

    @U1Chicago It always helps me to enlarge the👇images to highest resolution to estimate grading from photos.

    Coin #1: MS-62
    Coin #2: AU-58

    Based on my presumed grades, Coin #1 Should have sold for more than Coin #2.

    [See Red Box in 5th image👇below where I discerned Coin #2 exhibited Light Wear (and Fingerprint) to justify my AU-58 grade.]


    Coin #1



    Coin #2



    [Red Box👇below is where I discerned Coin #2 exhibited Light Wear (and Fingerprint) to justify my AU-58 grade.]


    Stuart

    Collect 18th & 19th Century US Type Coins, Silver Dollars, $20 Gold Double Eagles and World Crowns & Talers with High Eye Appeal

    "Luck is what happens when Preparation meets Opportunity"
  • Options
    ilmcoinsilmcoins Posts: 525 ✭✭✭✭

    58 and 62 .... the 1878 sold for more! 🤣😂😅

  • Options
    U1chicagoU1chicago Posts: 7,004 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Coin 1: UNC Details - Environmental Damage...sold for $552.38
    Coin 2: AU 58 w/ CAC...sold for $502.88

    Some thoughts:
    ~I thought the two coins were fairly close in appearance.
    ~I favored the look of coin 1 (the details one) slightly more.
    ~I thought the details example was a good opportunity to pick up a decent Trade Dollar at a discount due to the holder, but it seems a few others also saw it was a decent coin and bid it up

    https://www.greatcollections.com/Coin/714015/1878-S-Trade-Silver-Dollar-PCGS-Genuine-Unc-Details
    https://www.greatcollections.com/Coin/721343/1878-S-Trade-Silver-Dollar-PCGS-AU-58-CAC


  • Options
    Batman23Batman23 Posts: 5,519 ✭✭✭✭✭

    ED was on my mind when I looked at her but I was giving her the benefit of doubt. I still see it as not UNC. Even if it had straight graded I still think coin #2 is the better coin.

  • Options
    cameonut2011cameonut2011 Posts: 10,999 ✭✭✭✭✭

    If submitted enough, I think the first one would eventually straight grade.

  • Options
    cameonut2011cameonut2011 Posts: 10,999 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @U1chicago said:
    Coin 1: UNC Details - Environmental Damage...sold for $552.38
    Coin 2: AU 58 w/ CAC...sold for $502.88

    So a putatively damaged low grade unc is worth more than a CAC 58... Interesting. I would have guessed the second coin would have fetched more as it has superior eye appeal IMHO.

  • Options
    StuartStuart Posts: 9,831 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited June 25, 2019 9:18AM

    @MFeld @TradeDollarNut Based on my👇following grading assessment posted earlier in this thread (the only only one to correctly grade Coin #1 _MS_ and Coin #2 _AU_), perhaps I should consider becoming a Professional Grader!! 😉👍

    @Stuart said:
    @U1Chicago It always helps me to enlarge the👇images to highest resolution to estimate grading from photos.

    Coin #1: MS-62
    Coin #2: AU-58

    Based on my presumed grades, Coin #1 Should have sold for more than Coin #2.

    [See Red Box in 5th image👇below where I discerned Coin #2 exhibited Light Wear (and Fingerprint) to justify my AU-58 grade.]


    Coin #1



    Coin #2



    [Red Box👇below is where I discerned Coin #2 exhibited Light Wear (and Fingerprint) to justify my AU-58 grade.]


    Stuart

    Collect 18th & 19th Century US Type Coins, Silver Dollars, $20 Gold Double Eagles and World Crowns & Talers with High Eye Appeal

    "Luck is what happens when Preparation meets Opportunity"
  • Options
    MFeldMFeld Posts: 17,207 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Stuart said:
    @MFeld @TradeDollarNut Based on my👇following grading assessment posted earlier in this thread (the only only one to correctly grade Coin #1 _MS_ and Coin #2 _AU_), perhaps I should consider becoming a Professional Grader!! 😉👍

    @Stuart said:
    @U1Chicago It always helps me to enlarge the👇images to highest resolution to estimate grading from photos.

    Coin #1: MS-62
    Coin #2: AU-58

    Based on my presumed grades, Coin #1 Should have sold for more than Coin #2.

    [See Red Box in 5th image👇below where I discerned Coin #2 exhibited Light Wear (and Fingerprint) to justify my AU-58 grade.]


    Coin #1



    Coin #2



    [Red Box👇below is where I discerned Coin #2 exhibited Light Wear (and Fingerprint) to justify my AU-58 grade.]

    Sorry, Stuart, but no. In my opinion, a guess of MS62 on the first coin missed the mark more than a guess of AU58 did. And making guesses based on images is very different from grading in person. You can guess "correctly" from an image and still be "wrong" or guess "incorrectly" and still be "right".

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • Options
    StuartStuart Posts: 9,831 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MFeld You know that I greatly respect your opinion and am a big fan of yours, so I gratefully accept your constructive criticism. 👍

    (I’m just honored to be in the same Grading Neighborhood as you and @TradeDollarNut.) 😉

    @MFeld said:
    Sorry, Stuart, but no. In my opinion, a guess of MS62 on the first coin missed the mark more than a guess of AU58 did. And making guesses based on images is very different from grading in person. You can guess "correctly" from an image and still be "wrong" or guess "incorrectly" and still be "right".


    Stuart

    Collect 18th & 19th Century US Type Coins, Silver Dollars, $20 Gold Double Eagles and World Crowns & Talers with High Eye Appeal

    "Luck is what happens when Preparation meets Opportunity"
  • Options
    U1chicagoU1chicago Posts: 7,004 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Bump for anyone that did not see the reveal.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file