Home U.S. Coin Forum

Anyone have a Lincoln Memorial cent pattern sitting around?

RogerBRogerB Posts: 8,852 ✭✭✭✭✭

This letter is one of several referring to designs and testing of the 1959 memorial reverse for the Lincoln cent.

Comments

  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Is there some doubt that the trial pieces were all destroyed?? Cheers, RickO

  • CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 33,092 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Dang!
    So there was a Memorial Reverse die in the Mint at the same time as 1958 obverses!

    Numismatist. 54 year member ANA. Former ANA Senior Authenticator. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Author "The Enigmatic Lincoln Cents of 1922," due out late 2025.
  • kbbpllkbbpll Posts: 542 ✭✭✭✭

    @CaptHenway said:
    Dang!
    So there was a Memorial Reverse die in the Mint at the same time as 1958 obverses!

    Mint Employee #1: "But he didn't say to destroy these ones."
    Mint Employee #2: "He didn't say we could make them either!"

    (just kidding)

  • RogerBRogerB Posts: 8,852 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Actually, there was an intense effort to be sure no new reverse dies were accidentally paired with 1958 obverse dies. The order was to destroy - by physical count - all wheat reverse dies at all mints before any new reverse die would be sent out. Quantities had to match. Accountancy professor Howard managed this.

  • ZoinsZoins Posts: 34,401 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Does this mean @dcarr could make a YYYY date coin :o

  • MrEurekaMrEureka Posts: 24,515 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Zoins said:
    Does this mean @dcarr could make a YYYY date coin :o

    Maybe with the old reverse!

    Andy Lustig

    Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.

    Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
  • CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 33,092 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @RogerB said:
    Actually, there was an intense effort to be sure no new reverse dies were accidentally paired with 1958 obverse dies. The order was to destroy - by physical count - all wheat reverse dies at all mints before any new reverse die would be sent out. Quantities had to match. Accountancy professor Howard managed this.

    They destroyed the wheat reverses, but not the 1958-dated obverses?

    Numismatist. 54 year member ANA. Former ANA Senior Authenticator. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Author "The Enigmatic Lincoln Cents of 1922," due out late 2025.
  • RogerBRogerB Posts: 8,852 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The obverses would all have been destroyed in normal operation. Usable reverse dies were normally carried forward. This was an exception.

  • CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 33,092 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Curious, seeing as how Philadelphia struck over 28 million cents in December of 1958.

    Numismatist. 54 year member ANA. Former ANA Senior Authenticator. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Author "The Enigmatic Lincoln Cents of 1922," due out late 2025.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file