Home› U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Anyone have a Lincoln Memorial cent pattern sitting around?

RogerBRogerB Posts: 8,852 ✭✭✭✭✭

This letter is one of several referring to designs and testing of the 1959 memorial reverse for the Lincoln cent.

Comments

  • Options
    rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Is there some doubt that the trial pieces were all destroyed?? Cheers, RickO

  • Options
    CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 34,213 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Dang!
    So there was a Memorial Reverse die in the Mint at the same time as 1958 obverses!

    Professional Numismatist, Retired. 55 year member ANA. Former ANA Senior Authenticator. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and ANA Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner of the PNG's 2026 Robert Friedberg Award for "The Enigmatic Lincoln Cents of 1922," Available now from Whitman or Amazon.
  • Options
    kbbpllkbbpll Posts: 542 ✭✭✭✭

    @CaptHenway said:
    Dang!
    So there was a Memorial Reverse die in the Mint at the same time as 1958 obverses!

    Mint Employee #1: "But he didn't say to destroy these ones."
    Mint Employee #2: "He didn't say we could make them either!"

    (just kidding)

  • Options
    RogerBRogerB Posts: 8,852 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Actually, there was an intense effort to be sure no new reverse dies were accidentally paired with 1958 obverse dies. The order was to destroy - by physical count - all wheat reverse dies at all mints before any new reverse die would be sent out. Quantities had to match. Accountancy professor Howard managed this.

  • Options
    ZoinsZoins Posts: 34,489 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Does this mean @dcarr could make a YYYY date coin :o

  • Options
    MrEurekaMrEureka Posts: 24,790 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Zoins said:
    Does this mean @dcarr could make a YYYY date coin :o

    Maybe with the old reverse!

    Andy Lustig

    Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
    Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
  • Options
    CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 34,213 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @RogerB said:
    Actually, there was an intense effort to be sure no new reverse dies were accidentally paired with 1958 obverse dies. The order was to destroy - by physical count - all wheat reverse dies at all mints before any new reverse die would be sent out. Quantities had to match. Accountancy professor Howard managed this.

    They destroyed the wheat reverses, but not the 1958-dated obverses?

    Professional Numismatist, Retired. 55 year member ANA. Former ANA Senior Authenticator. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and ANA Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner of the PNG's 2026 Robert Friedberg Award for "The Enigmatic Lincoln Cents of 1922," Available now from Whitman or Amazon.
  • Options
    RogerBRogerB Posts: 8,852 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The obverses would all have been destroyed in normal operation. Usable reverse dies were normally carried forward. This was an exception.

  • Options
    CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 34,213 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Curious, seeing as how Philadelphia struck over 28 million cents in December of 1958.

    Professional Numismatist, Retired. 55 year member ANA. Former ANA Senior Authenticator. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and ANA Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner of the PNG's 2026 Robert Friedberg Award for "The Enigmatic Lincoln Cents of 1922," Available now from Whitman or Amazon.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file