Options
GTG - 1875-CC Double Eagle, grade posted
KollectorKing
Posts: 4,820 ✭✭✭✭✭
1
KollectorKing
Posts: 4,820 ✭✭✭✭✭
Comments
53.
55
Looks as if it could go 59 from the pictures... Cheers, RickO
53
End Systemic Elitism - It Takes All of Us
ANA LM, LSCC, EAC, FUN
AU50 and a fairly nice one at that. Congrats!
The whole worlds off its rocker, buy Gold™.
BOOMIN!™
Wooooha! Did someone just say it's officially "TACO™" Tuesday????
Retiring at 55, what day is today?
I was thinking AU55, until I turned the coin over and I ended up at AU58. How much larger/worse could the reverse digs/cuts be before a details grade would/should be assigned?
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
au55
That tough call but 53-55
Best place to buy !
Bronze Associate member
I'm at 58.
Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍
My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):
https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/
I am thinking a solid 55
I'm at 55,4 shot 56.9, but you've got be a full 57 to get a 55+. This date comes nice for a CC, and this piece has very good frost for a circ, better, in fact, than a PCGS AU58 CAC of the same date I just sold, but the gouge mark on the back, well-obscured as it might be by the busyness of the devices, stops me from a full 58.
I’m at 55 but I think that gouge makes it’s a candidate for a NG.
m
Fellas, leave the tight pants to the ladies. If I can count the coins in your pockets you better use them to call a tailor. Stay thirsty my friends......
55
NG someone was picking at that spot.
I can’t see the gouge on the reverse from my iPhone. Can someone point it out?
Looks 55.
That gouge is not big enough to doom a CC.
Look to the right of the letter D. after the word TWENTY.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
It's not a gouge, dammit, it's a mark
Got it, thanks Mark
53/55.
I have 53 on this. I have one in 55 that is just a bit nicer...
Well, just Love coins, period.
AU53
Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value. Zero. Voltaire. Ebay coinbowlllc
58
Nice EF. Too much wear to be AU.
Maybe so in 1974.
Not so now.
The coin has not changed. It is EF; nothing more or less.
53
55
That would be a AU55 in a PCGS slab.
Also too fast
I would have guessed 53.
No way will this ever cross or get a bean.
Wow, I really could not have seen this at all and am with Marcmoish. I posted a 55 some time ago that would in all likelihood be a choice over this one. Well, love those CC 20s in any case!
Well, just Love coins, period.
Wow, I like it !!!
Of course the coin has not changed but if you are a buyer today you won't get too many coins offering XF money for AU 58 coins.
I agree with those like Mark Feld on the reason for the grade; 58 is about right. PCGS overgrades as many $20 coins as NGC as far as I've seen, but it doesn't look like a cac.
Looks better than 58
The "cost" per actual condition is identical. It has not changed. Only deceptive labeling has entered the picture. Yes, this is difficult to conceptualize.
if you are happy with the coin and it's cost to you, then you have received full value !
I was going to post AU53.
Congrats.
I think I’ll pass on the coin.