Home› U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Reverse Proof W Cent Discovered April 4'th Before Official Release!!!

OnastoneOnastone Posts: 4,429 ✭✭✭✭✭

Someone discovered a RP W cent, sent out with their Clad Proof Set, instead of the regular proof W cent. Sent into NGC for grading and came back with this pedigree: 2019 W 1C First Releases PF 69 RD REVERSE PROOF Mistakenly Included With Clad Proof Set. Talk about extra early releases. Shouldn't this have really gotten a Pre-First Day of Issue status? This really is coin #1.
Saw this posted on Instagram just a few moments ago.

Comments

  • Options
    HemisphericalHemispherical Posts: 9,370 ✭✭✭✭✭

    From ATS.

  • Options
    OnastoneOnastone Posts: 4,429 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Here's a photo from CoinNews.net

  • Options
    OnastoneOnastone Posts: 4,429 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Hemispherical you beat me to the photo by seconds!!!!! LOL

  • Options
    rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    That must have been a great surprise.... What a cool find. Cheers, RickO

  • Options
    ifthevamzarockinifthevamzarockin Posts: 8,915 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Wow! Lucky! :)

  • Options
    HemisphericalHemispherical Posts: 9,370 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Unless another is found before the actual Mint release date then this cent with cert number 4959820-001will probably go for moon $$$.

  • Options
    Timbuk3Timbuk3 Posts: 11,658 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Wow, "cool", I like it !!! :)

    Timbuk3
  • Options
    OnastoneOnastone Posts: 4,429 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Hemispherical said:
    Unless another is found before the actual Mint release date then this cent with cert number 4959820-001will probably go for moon $$$.

    But technically not really an error coin, and no date on slab to back it up....

  • Options
    HemisphericalHemispherical Posts: 9,370 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Onastone said:

    @Hemispherical said:
    Unless another is found before the actual Mint release date then this cent with cert number 4959820-001will probably go for moon $$$.

    But technically not really an error coin, and no date on slab to back it up....

    True. But has several news articles and an article by ATS to establish the initial provenance.

  • Options
    rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Technically, this cent should receive 'First Strike' designation.... :D Well.... it is the first one found even before release.... ;) Cheers, RickO

  • Options
    CuKevinCuKevin Posts: 1,781 ✭✭✭✭

    That’s one way to encourage massive orders of proof sets >:)

    Zircon Cases - Protect Your Vintage Slabs www.ZirconCases.com
    Former CoFounder of Choice Numismatics

    All of my collection is in a safe deposit box!
  • Options
    coinpalicecoinpalice Posts: 2,469 ✭✭✭✭✭

    maybe a inside job

  • Options
    TetromibiTetromibi Posts: 947 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @ricko said:
    Technically, this cent should receive 'First Strike' designation.... :D Well.... it is the first one found even before release.... ;) Cheers, RickO

    It's NGC. While first release is still appropriate, they should definitely have gone for "early release" for this guy.

  • Options
    DCWDCW Posts: 7,891 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Considering that it is the same reverse proof cent that will be released shortly, should this even carry a premium at all?
    Cracked out of the NGC slab, it is "normal" again.

    Dead Cat Waltz Exonumia
    "Coin collecting for outcasts..."

  • Options
    3stars3stars Posts: 2,303 ✭✭✭✭✭

    There was a Sac buck found in 1999 that was slabbed and date on the label. Wonder if that has any value today?

    Previous transactions: Wondercoin, goldman86, dmarks, Type2
  • Options
    HemisphericalHemispherical Posts: 9,370 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @3stars said:
    There was a Sac buck found in 1999 that was slabbed and date on the label. Wonder if that has any value today?

    Is that the Cheerios Sacs? Maybe @CaptHenway knows?

    @DCW said:
    Considering that it is the same reverse proof cent that will be released shortly, should this even carry a premium at all?
    Cracked out of the NGC slab, it is "normal" again.

    Since it is an actual “first” then it would best to keep it slabbed. I’d petition either TPGS to update the label to date the find.

  • Options
    RogerBRogerB Posts: 8,852 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The label should have included the date of discovery or at least the date it was slabbed.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file