1884 Morgan dollar PCGS MS66, cac?
logger7
Posts: 9,050 ✭✭✭✭✭
How do you folks feel about this 1884 dollar, would this cac? 
1
logger7
Posts: 9,050 ✭✭✭✭✭
Comments
I know nothing regarding the cac but you have a nice 64, perhaps even 65 common date there. Nice and clean just like she was meant to be. Congrats
The whole worlds off its rocker, buy Gold™.
BOOMIN!™
Wooooha! Did someone just say it's officially "TACO™" Tuesday????
No
Tom
Based on the pictures, I would say it would not be stickered.....I could change my mind if I saw it in hand...Cheers, RickO
Can't tell much from the photos.
You do realize it's in a 66 holder, right?
The only answer to the OP's question is "maybe". Anyone that thinks they can split grading hairs from photos online is kidding him/herself.
Tilt it back a bit and then photograph it again... There are too many dark areas to see the surfaces. If what I am interpreting to be contact marks are contact marks, then no bean for you.
Can't really tell from your pics. It looks flat with no luster. The cheeks looks like a lot of bag marks, My guess would be "no" !!!
Hard to say from those pictures...
My YouTube Channel
nope
BHNC #203
I think what looks like a fingerprint on the cheek would keep it from stickering, but I could be wrong
Collector, occasional seller
I can't speak for gradeflation. I'd buy it as a 64 as that's what it is. Could care less about the cac but if it makes you happy I'll go with no.
The whole worlds off its rocker, buy Gold™.
BOOMIN!™
Wooooha! Did someone just say it's officially "TACO™" Tuesday????
No.
No
Hard to tell, will try to get better pics.
No I don't think it would CAC
Ike Specialist
Finest Toned Ike I've Ever Seen, been looking since 1986
biased on your photos I would say no
My Collection of Old Holders
Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
What is on the cheek?
If the coin is actually bright white, well struck and that and/or the mark I see in the left field are on the plastic, send it in.
Looks kind of dull and washed-out.
May just be the images.
Looks like nice original white luster and if JA sees anything that distracts like the cheek, which I don't see a fingerprint, I would say don't bother. JA likes toning, DH wrote about this when JA started NGC. Anyways if you had a circle of tone on the coin it would CAC without it your coin has to be 100% all there original.
You got nice original "white luster" on the devices and a picture about as good as I can take and in my GTGs I had to make a rule "No more; I can't see the coin" excuses. Best Regards, Michael
I doubt it
Unless the cheek activity is on the plastic, I believe the coin is a 65 and not a super nice one.
I'm surprised people are responding with definitive answers those images aren't showing anything close to what you'd need to see to have a strong opinion (IMO
)
my thoughts exactly !
I don't like the cheek for CAC but the image probably doesn't represent the coin as it looks in hand, I'd imagine.
"Bongo hurtles along the rain soaked highway of life on underinflated bald retread tires."
~Wayne