Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Does "AU" mean "Almost Uncirculated" or "About Uncirculated?"

CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 33,900 ✭✭✭✭✭

Likewise does "EF" mean "Extra Fine" or "Extremely Fine?" and so on down the scale?

Looking at the two majors' websites all I see are the letter abbreviations (AU, EF, etc.) because obviously they do not wish to face this question (can't say that I blame them).

Should "Proof" be abbreviated as "PF" or "PR?" Should "Poor" be identified as "PO" or "PR?" Obviously the former affects the latter and vice versa.

I am sure we have gone round this mulberry bush before, and if anybody has a link to an earlier discussion please post it.

TD

Numismatist. 54 year member ANA. Former ANA Senior Authenticator. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and ANA Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Also won the PNG's Robert Friedberg Award for "The Enigmatic Lincoln Cents of 1922," Available now from Whitman or Amazon.

Comments

  • Options
    koynekwestkoynekwest Posts: 10,048 ✭✭✭✭✭

    About, extremely, PR, and PO for me.

  • Options
    fiftysevenerfiftysevener Posts: 943 ✭✭✭✭

    How about 'already uncirculated now almost uncirculated'.

  • Options
    ctf_error_coinsctf_error_coins Posts: 15,433 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Almost Uncirculated
    Extremely Fine
    PF
    PO
    IMO

  • Options
    StaircoinsStaircoins Posts: 2,590 ✭✭✭✭

    ...and it's XF, not EF, dontyaknow?!?

    ;)

  • Options
    ParadisefoundParadisefound Posts: 8,623 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 18, 2018 11:50AM

    I think Almost Circulated is a better term bcause 'About Uncirculated' to me means not as yet circulated :/

  • Options
    ParadisefoundParadisefound Posts: 8,623 ✭✭✭✭✭

    PF <3

  • Options
    DNADaveDNADave Posts: 7,346 ✭✭✭✭✭

    AG and AU....both 'about'. At least traditionally. Now that the world has gone crazy, you can call anything, anything you want.

  • Options
    koynekwestkoynekwest Posts: 10,048 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Staircoins said:
    ...and it's XF, not EF, dontyaknow?!?

    ;)

    I concur.

  • Options
    BaleyBaley Posts: 22,663 ✭✭✭✭✭

    "THEY", imo, need to either drop the one or two word adjectives in grades, and just say a number from 0 through 70, 9r else enable the addition of several more words that accurately describe and represent the state of preservation 9f the coin.

    Far too many pieces, especially older higher grade rare coins, are AU but worth MS, or Unc but net grade (worth) AU or XF or VF due to handling. Lots of coins are illiquid because they're hard to describe accurately on a little tag.

    Almost.

    Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry

  • This content has been removed.
  • Options
    messydeskmessydesk Posts: 20,751 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Staircoins said:
    ...and it's XF, not EF, dontyaknow?!?

    ;)

    I was at a PCGS lunch once when QDB let fly with an unstoppable stream of consciousness about this, among other things, insisting that EF was correct because "extremely" starts with an E.

  • Options
    messydeskmessydesk Posts: 20,751 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The ANA grading guide uses Extremely Fine, and About Uncirculated. World grading scales prefix various grades with 'a' to mean 'about.'

  • Options
    BUFFNIXXBUFFNIXX Posts: 2,759 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 17, 2018 7:38PM

    Either about uncirculated or almost uncirculated are equally acceptable. Its just like the circulated grade extremely fine which is sometimes called extra fine. When you hear either term, --about or almost, extremely or extra -- there is no confusion as most collectors have heard these interchangeable terms over the years. Another similarity is collectors using the term “double die” instead of “doubled die”. The first term is incorrect but is kind of accepted in the numismatic lexicon.
    Whether you use “double” or “doubled” die the same meaning is usually correctly conveyed. If for example you say
    “1916 double die obverse nickel” it conveys the same meaning as “1916 doubleD die obverse nickel” with little if any confusion. In my opinion based upon what I have picked up over the years actually “double die” is a bit more commonly used than “doubled die” though technically incorrect.

    Collector of Buffalo Nickels and other 20th century United States Coinage
    a.k.a "The BUFFINATOR"
  • Options
    ms70ms70 Posts: 13,958 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 17, 2018 8:02PM

    I've always known it to be "about" uncirculated. I don't know who the ultimate authority is on that.

  • Options
    thefinnthefinn Posts: 2,657 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Isn't gEF=AU?

    thefinn
  • Options
    thefinnthefinn Posts: 2,657 ✭✭✭✭✭

    What does the Red Book say?

    thefinn
  • Options
    ColonialcoinColonialcoin Posts: 871 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I call a coin AU and value and/or price it according to how choice it is. I have bigger fish to fry rather than to spend my time deciding what specific adjective to use on a coin. I must admit that this topic has never come up in discussion with the people that I buy from in all my years of collecting colonial and federal coins.

  • Options
    3keepSECRETif2rDEAD3keepSECRETif2rDEAD Posts: 4,285 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 17, 2018 8:13PM

    ...only thing I can add is that if somebody “about paid me” then they are in a slightly better position than somebody that “almost paid me”...hope that helps ;)

  • Options
    WildIdeaWildIdea Posts: 1,881 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I always thought it a little weird that all the grades you can give a coin are positive adjectives but Poor. From Poor to

    Fair
    About Good
    Good
    Very Good
    Fine,
    Very Fine,
    Exstemely Fine,
    About Uncirculated
    MS

    I mean to me, a coin has to be pretty darn nice for even the word “Good” to ring in my head! Good would have quite a bit of meat worn off. In my mind, a coin that’s low MS is About Good and say a MS 65, Very Fine and something over 66 is Extremely Fine! I think that’s solid words to call them, but that’s just me, maybe because I’m not collecting early large cents but things that can come mint state and still relatively affordable.

    I always pictured an old timey coin dealer came up the the grading adjectives to get coins sold and somewhere along the way, they stuck.

  • Options
    Timbuk3Timbuk3 Posts: 11,658 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Almost unused !!! ;)

    Timbuk3
  • Options
    BlindedByEgoBlindedByEgo Posts: 10,754 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I'll never forget when early on at the forum I posted a coin and asked grade opinions.

    One of the respected old-timers said that he graded it $1000.00.

    Everything else is just semantics.

  • Options
    RB1026RB1026 Posts: 1,521 ✭✭✭✭

    I suppose that as long as buyer and seller understand the description accurately, anything goes. The key is honest disclosure to ensure fairness to all parties, imo.

    For me, it's-

    XF = Extremely Fine
    AU = About Uncirculated
    PR = Proof (because that's what PCGS does ;) - for example PR70DCAM)
    PO = Poor (again, because that's what PCGS does ;) - for example PO01)

    After 40+ years in the hobby, I don't care a whole lot about the "why" it's that way. I just understand what those terms represent. That's just me.

  • Options
    koynekwestkoynekwest Posts: 10,048 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Baley said:
    "THEY", imo, need to either drop the one or two word adjectives in grades, and just say a number from 0 through 70, 9r else enable the addition of several more words that accurately describe and represent the state of preservation 9f the coin.

    Far too many pieces, especially older higher grade rare coins, are AU but worth MS, or Unc but net grade (worth) AU or XF or VF due to handling. Lots of coins are illiquid because they're hard to describe accurately on a little tag.

    Almost.

    Plain ol' numbers make the most sense IMO but would be confusing to those who use letters.

  • Options
    lkeigwinlkeigwin Posts: 16,895 ✭✭✭✭✭

    At a PCGS show luncheon not long ago, as QDB closed his remarks he added, as an aside, "everyone knows it's EF not XF". Huh. I like XF.

    AU is "about uncirculated". It's a lousy description but original.

    I like "PR", not "PF".

    Not sure about "poor". I've never owned one.
    Lance.

  • Options
    CoinstartledCoinstartled Posts: 10,135 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @WildIdea said:
    I always thought it a little weird that all the grades you can give a coin are positive adjectives but Poor. From Poor to

    Fair
    About Good
    Good
    Very Good
    Fine,
    Very Fine,
    Exstemely Fine,
    About Uncirculated
    MS

    I mean to me, a coin has to be pretty darn nice for even the word “Good” to ring in my head! Good would have quite a bit of meat worn off. In my mind, a coin that’s low MS is About Good and say a MS 65, Very Fine and something over 66 is Extremely Fine! I think that’s solid words to call them, but that’s just me, maybe because I’m not collecting early large cents but things that can come mint state and still relatively affordable.

    I always pictured an old timey coin dealer came up the the grading adjectives to get coins sold and somewhere along the way, they stuck.

    >

    An old time jeweler that I worked for many years ago lamented that all the diamond grades short of flawless included the word imperfect. Try selling a $20k stone to a fresh faced customer that is very very slightly imperfect.

    The coins guys were better marketers.

  • Options
    cameonut2011cameonut2011 Posts: 10,458 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @ErrorsOnCoins said:
    Almost Uncirculated
    Extremely Fine
    PF
    PO

    This is what I have always used.

  • Options
    BaleyBaley Posts: 22,663 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Coinstartled said:

    @WildIdea said:
    I always thought it a little weird that all the grades you can give a coin are positive adjectives but Poor. From Poor to

    Fair
    About Good
    Good
    Very Good
    Fine,
    Very Fine,
    Exstemely Fine,
    About Uncirculated
    MS

    I mean to me, a coin has to be pretty darn nice for even the word “Good” to ring in my head! Good would have quite a bit of meat worn off. In my mind, a coin that’s low MS is About Good and say a MS 65, Very Fine and something over 66 is Extremely Fine! I think that’s solid words to call them, but that’s just me, maybe because I’m not collecting early large cents but things that can come mint state and still relatively affordable.

    I always pictured an old timey coin dealer came up the the grading adjectives to get coins sold and somewhere along the way, they stuck.

    >

    An old time jeweler that I worked for many years ago lamented that all the diamond grades short of flawless included the word imperfect. Try selling a $20k stone to a fresh faced customer that is very very slightly imperfect.

    The coins guys were better marketers.

    Oh, part of that is Marketing.

    I once ordered a Small Coke..

    "We don't have Small, or Medium..
    We only have Large, Extra Large, and Jumbo."

    Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry

  • Options
    ACopACop Posts: 1,479 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Approaching uncirculated

  • Options
    StaircoinsStaircoins Posts: 2,590 ✭✭✭✭

    "Proof" (no matter how abbreviated) is not a grade. It's a method of manufacture.

  • Options
    PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 47,541 ✭✭✭✭✭

    With grade inflation over the years, Almost Uncirculated makes more sense than About Uncirculated.

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • Options
    DollarAfterDollarDollarAfterDollar Posts: 3,217 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The ANA created a book called the grading guide years ago. In it these things are each clarified. Perhaps you've heard of them?

    Hehe.

    If you do what you always did, you get what you always got.
  • Options
    rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    This demonstrates the inherent weakness of coin grading... even the descriptive terms are fluid and mean different things to collectors/dealers. No standards in grading and no standards in labeling. ;) Cheers, RickO

  • Options
    CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 33,900 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Thank you all for your comments. I appreciate them.
    TD

    Numismatist. 54 year member ANA. Former ANA Senior Authenticator. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and ANA Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Also won the PNG's Robert Friedberg Award for "The Enigmatic Lincoln Cents of 1922," Available now from Whitman or Amazon.
  • Options
    gripgrip Posts: 9,962 ✭✭✭✭✭

    He's not dead.........he's just not breathing.:)

  • Options
    BaleyBaley Posts: 22,663 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @ricko said:
    This demonstrates the inherent weakness of coin grading... even the descriptive terms are fluid and mean different things to collectors/dealers. No standards in grading and no standards in labeling. ;) Cheers, RickO

    I don't think it's that there are NO standards, it's just that the standards aren't rigid and scientific in all respects.

    "Ratings" for cars, restaurants, movies, art, music, antiques, all have elements of fluidity and opinion. And so do coins. "Experts" simply use guidelines and experience to provide an evaluation based on generally recognized measures of Quality, but of course, everyone is free to dissent and vote with their dollars.

    Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry

  • Options
    OnastoneOnastone Posts: 4,373 ✭✭✭✭✭

    NW ......... No Way
    NG ......... Not Good
    OK ......... Okay
    HMM......... Hmmm
    M .......... Maybe
    G .......... Good
    IWI ......... I Want It
    S ....... Sold
    WIC ....... What? It's Counterfeit?

  • Options
    rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Baley.... You are, of course, correct....However, I call them guidelines, not standards...The very word demands rigidity and control. Cheers, RickO

  • Options
    OldEastsideOldEastside Posts: 4,602 ✭✭✭✭✭

    AU is a term I use when I see someone I know but forgot there name and in my best Joey from friends impersonation I say "A U"

    Steve

    Promote the Hobby
  • Options
    CatbertCatbert Posts: 8,194 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Seated Half Society member #38

    "She comes out of the sun in a silk dress,
    running like a water color in the rain...."
  • Options
    TwoSides2aCoinTwoSides2aCoin Posts: 45,041 ✭✭✭✭✭

    PF. should stand for poof. What happens to members around here.

  • Options
    TreashuntTreashunt Posts: 6,747 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Does "AU" mean "Almost Uncirculated" or "About Uncirculated?"

    yes

    :)

    Frank

    BHNC #203

  • Options
    mr1931Smr1931S Posts: 7,032 ✭✭✭✭✭

    About Extremely Fine (39) is the highest grade there is for circulated coins. Anyone who says different doesn't know how to grade coins.

    If a picture wasn't going very well I'd put a puppy dog in it, always a mongrel, you know, never one of the full bred puppies. And then I'd put a bandage on its foot... I liked it when I did it, but now I'm sick of it.
    Norman Rockwell

  • Options
    WildIdeaWildIdea Posts: 1,881 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Coinstartled said:

    @WildIdea said:
    I always thought it a little weird that all the grades you can give a coin are positive adjectives but Poor. From Poor to

    Fair
    About Good
    Good
    Very Good
    Fine,
    Very Fine,
    Exstemely Fine,
    About Uncirculated
    MS

    I mean to me, a coin has to be pretty darn nice for even the word “Good” to ring in my head! Good would have quite a bit of meat worn off. In my mind, a coin that’s low MS is About Good and say a MS 65, Very Fine and something over 66 is Extremely Fine! I think that’s solid words to call them, but that’s just me, maybe because I’m not collecting early large cents but things that can come mint state and still relatively affordable.

    I always pictured an old timey coin dealer came up the the grading adjectives to get coins sold and somewhere along the way, they stuck.

    >

    An old time jeweler that I worked for many years ago lamented that all the diamond grades short of flawless included the word imperfect. Try selling a $20k stone to a fresh faced customer that is very very slightly imperfect.

    The coins guys were better marketers.

    I get the technique and I’m a student of what I call “Words that Work” in the art of the consultation. Some words should never be uttered and others come off better or induce more predictable reactions in others. With that said, sometimes too strong a word can come off like a swarmy Obi Won Kenobi hand wave Jedi mind trick and so obviously a sales ploy that it sets off ones BS detector and just as likely kill a deal.

    Now I’m Not a diamond expert but since you brought it up I had to search diamond grading terminology. I found that there are several orders of grading and Some on a letter and numerical scale. At some point they seem to have migrated away from lofty verbiage within the scale. I think that is a more classy move. For instance, I would think I could admire a diamond graded VS 1 for what it is and clearly assess a value without the distraction of a word placed in my head by a salesman. With coins, we know the coin isn’t “Good”. We can clearly see it’s a slicked out remnant. To me, it makes one, us, our hobby come off wrong.

    I can easily work around it myself, but since it came up, I just wanted to say it out loud.

  • Options
    BryceMBryceM Posts: 11,933 ✭✭✭✭✭

    A rose, by any other name......

    Every human endeavor has its own language and what my wife calls "weirdities". To jump in and fully participate you've got to learn it.

  • Options
    robecrobec Posts: 7,032 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Paradisefound said:
    I think Almost Circulated is a better term bcause 'About Uncirculated' to me means not as yet circulated :/

    Doesn't Almost mean the same thing? o:)

  • Options
    ACopACop Posts: 1,479 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 19, 2018 8:31AM

    au 58 = almost unc
    au 55 = about almost unc
    au 53 = about unc
    au 50 = almost about unc

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file