Back to the drawing board!

1 to 2 points off what I was a hoping especially the 67's
Line Items Cert # PCGS # Description Grade Country
1 1 36292444 83401 1963 1C, CA PR66CA USA
2 1 36292445 3296 1967 1C SMS, RD SP66RD USA
3 1 36292446 93452 1977-S 1C, DC PR67DC USA
4 1 36292447 4199 1967 5C SMS SP66 USA
5 1 36292448 84201 1969-S 5C, CA PR67CA USA
6 1 36292449 94210 1977-S 5C, DC PR68DC USA
7 1 36292450 86001 1969-S 25C, CA PR68CA USA
0
Comments
They certainly look like good grades - obviously you were expecting better. Well, ownership does add a point
.... In the words of Bobby Ferrin - "Don't worry, be happy...." Cheers, RickO
I take it that this concerns regestry board standings ...
A couple of points.
I'd be very happy with those 7's ..... let us see some pictures
68 is a tough barrier to break through
Collector, occasional seller
Not yet anyway, I just like the idea of finding the treasure for almost nothing and then o'course it has to be confirmed. So I will most likely hoard it once I do. I think if I had enough money to buy the best coins I would probably be fishing instead and buying coins
And they are certainly better than my first run, which was 60's lincolns grading ms64s and ms65s. Apparently the business strikes are harder to find. And yes, I am happy and now hungry for more.
I will as soon as they arrive, thanks.
So is 78 on the golf course. I'm still working on that too.
Playing the condition rarity game does not appeal to me. I would rather have a less common coin in a lower grade than a common coin in a lofty grade. To each his own though.
I wouldn't mind owning a few of those early 1800's coins myself. I'm sure that bug will get me as well. I'm just going through the motions and right now I'm scratching the surface, get it
Did you expect MS-65 but were 'given' MS-67?
I guess you could look at it that way, but I was expecting 69dcam on the quarter and cameo on the sms penny. At least now I will have some specimens for comparison.
Without clear, public standards - and there aren't any for "cameo" - it's not possible for collectors to assess the potential 'grade' of their coins. This simply wastes collector time and money.
I would think the people at PCGS probably have a clear understanding of the parameters for Cameo. And until I can think like that fish I will keep swinging.
Assess the grade maybe not, but the potential should be just the potential right.
Coins finally made it in and here are the pics. So, I posted two pics of the 67 sms 1c and I think I learned something about the Cameo designation. With shade it looks like a Cameo but in full light it obviously is not. What do you think?












You did good .... few DCAM would make me happy any day of the week

I really like your 1977 S PR67 RD DCAM
Yea, I'm actually pretty happy with the results and the collection is under way