I got to play with a 33 Saint at ANA!

Options
messydesk
messydesk Posts: 20,814 ✭✭✭✭✭

OK, so it's "only" a $10 Indian, and it's "only" a 65+, and it's "only" the Morse specimen. Congratulations on the landmark sale, @segoja !

Comments

  • Paradisefound
    Paradisefound Posts: 8,623 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited August 18, 2018 10:00PM
    Options

    What do you mean by 'got to play?' Did you acquire it? I want to play too :/
    What a beauty!

  • Raybo
    Raybo Posts: 5,362 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    I disagree with the grade but that is one cool Eagle!

  • messydesk
    messydesk Posts: 20,814 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @Paradisefound said:
    What do you mean by 'got to play?' Did you acquire it?

    I got to photograph it yesterday. It's a few zeroes out of my league.

  • Paradisefound
    Paradisefound Posts: 8,623 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Well.... it's a winning photograph <3

    @messydesk said:

    @Paradisefound said:
    What do you mean by 'got to play?' Did you acquire it?

    I got to photograph it yesterday. It's a few zeroes out of my league.

  • oih82w8
    oih82w8 Posts: 13,206 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Very majestic!

    oih82w8 = Oh I Hate To Wait _defectus patientia_aka...Dr. Defecto - Curator of RMO's

    BST transactions: dbldie55, jayPem, 78saen, UltraHighRelief, nibanny, liefgold, FallGuy, lkeigwin, mbogoman, Sandman70gt, keets, joeykoins, ianrussell (@GC), EagleEye, ThePennyLady, GRANDAM, Ilikecolor, Gluggo, okiedude, Voyageur, LJenkins11, fastfreddie, ms70, pursuitofliberty, ZoidMeister,Coin Finder, GotTheBug, edwardjulio, Coinnmore, Nickpatton, Namvet69,...
  • Timbuk3
    Timbuk3 Posts: 11,658 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Wow, impressive !!! :)

    Timbuk3
  • scubafuel
    scubafuel Posts: 2,080 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    That is very cool, and congrats for the opportunity!

    Can someone knowledgeable in this series educate me: Would this be considered a solid 65?

  • georgiacop50
    georgiacop50 Posts: 2,909 ✭✭✭✭
    Options

    CACed?

  • messydesk
    messydesk Posts: 20,814 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
  • ricko
    ricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Very nice and great pictures. Definitely a thrill to hold such a piece. Cheers, RickO

  • Boosibri
    Boosibri Posts: 12,714 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Ya, that's sweet.

  • tradedollarnut
    tradedollarnut Posts: 20,754 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @scubafuel said:
    That is very cool, and congrats for the opportunity!

    Can someone knowledgeable in this series educate me: Would this be considered a solid 65?

    It is for the date. ;)

  • RogerB
    RogerB Posts: 8,852 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @scubafuel said:
    That is very cool, and congrats for the opportunity!

    Can someone knowledgeable in this series educate me: Would this be considered a solid 65?

    No. The posted "grade" has been skewed upward, possibly in the mistaken belief that because the coin is rare it is somehow in better condition than a common date. The scruffy cheek and deep reverse gouge merit nothing higher than MS-64.

  • Kccoin
    Kccoin Posts: 1,086 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    what a beautiful coin!

    I nominate this coin for next year's calender

  • Broadstruck
    Broadstruck Posts: 30,497 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited August 19, 2018 2:18PM
    Options

    This is false advertising to some degree...

    I feel short changed and think you owe me the $10 difference for even bothering opening this thread ;):D

    To Err Is Human.... To Collect Err's Is Just Too Much Darn Tootin Fun!
  • GRANDAM
    GRANDAM Posts: 8,785 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Way to go James,,,,,, that is a heck of a coin!

    GrandAm :)
  • messydesk
    messydesk Posts: 20,814 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @Kccoin said:
    what a beautiful coin!

    I nominate this coin for next year's calender

    No need. It's already secured a spot.

  • asheland
    asheland Posts: 24,545 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    That's a terrific $10 Indian!

  • renman95
    renman95 Posts: 7,037 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Nice pic of the Eagle. If the date was 1932, no way would it grade 65+.

  • segoja
    segoja Posts: 6,141 ✭✭✭✭
    Options

    rogerB How many of this date have you seen in hand???? This is one of the finest known 1933's, and to knock it without ever having seen the coin is just not proper. All the auction records (descriptions) support my view. Please support your opinion with some facts, other than your grading skills.

    The coin has a legitimate shot at 66, irregardless of the date. The luster is out of this world. Yes a few marks, but I'm not claiming the coin is a 68, and I have sold MS68's in this series....CAC to boot.

    JMSCoins Website Link


    Ike Specialist

    Finest Toned Ike I've Ever Seen, been looking since 1986

    image
  • tyler267
    tyler267 Posts: 1,335 ✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Amazing coin

  • DollarAfterDollar
    DollarAfterDollar Posts: 3,217 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    The fact that old gold rarely tones anyway makes this toned coin extra special. I'm not in love with it but it does add interest. Very nice coin and ya had us going messyjohn..

    If you do what you always did, you get what you always got.
  • valente151
    valente151 Posts: 1,123 ✭✭✭
    edited August 20, 2018 8:13PM
    Options

    @segoja said:
    The coin has a legitimate shot at 66, irregardless of the date. The luster is out of this world. Yes a few marks, but I'm not claiming the coin is a 68, and I have sold MS68's in this series....CAC to boot.

    The most important thing I ever learned about grading coins, not all coins start out at a 70, most don't, for reasons from low luster, planchet defects, poor striking, etc. This coin DOES appears to have, with crazy luster and pop, and the "only" demerits are the contact marks. It's gold... its soft... it happens. Looks like the grade is appropriate to me given this.

    (There's my one post for Q3 2018... back to studying.)

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file