Home› U.S. Coin Forum

1957.. die gouges!?!?

CRH4LIFECRH4LIFE Posts: 849 ✭✭✭✭
edited June 17, 2018 6:38PM in U.S. Coin Forum










Tagged:

Comments

  • CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 33,675 ✭✭✭✭✭

    No idea what that is.

    Numismatist. 54 year member ANA. Former ANA Senior Authenticator. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and ANA Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Also won the PNG's Robert Friedberg Award for "The Enigmatic Lincoln Cents of 1922," Available now from Whitman or Amazon.
  • WoodenJeffersonWoodenJefferson Posts: 6,491 ✭✭✭✭

    Looks to be as the number 9 was positioned like a 6 (inverted) and bumped the die. Long stretch of the imagination.

    Chat Board Lingo

    "Keep your malarkey filter in good operating order" -Walter Breen
  • CRH4LIFECRH4LIFE Posts: 849 ✭✭✭✭

    I posted it on one of the coin forums on fb and the list went on and on. A few people mentioned a possible inverted number. Than after a while a few more mentioned the gouges. But it I still always helpfull for more opinions. Thinking about sending it to wexler but I don't want to waste my money!

  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It is not an inverted number.... could well be a die gouge or a die chip....Cheers, RickO

  • 291fifth291fifth Posts: 25,111 ✭✭✭✭✭

    An unimportant minor variety at best. Don't waste good money by having it "authenticated, etc."

    All glory is fleeting.
  • CRH4LIFECRH4LIFE Posts: 849 ✭✭✭✭

    I won't now! Thanks for advice guys

  • TreashuntTreashunt Posts: 6,747 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @ricko said:
    It is not an inverted number.... could well be a die gouge or a die chip....Cheers, RickO

    ditto!

    Frank

    BHNC #203

  • CRH4LIFECRH4LIFE Posts: 849 ✭✭✭✭

    Thought I would give an update guys. Another 1957 D has surfaced exact match with mine. A overlay was done and it is a match. So I guess the other mans coin was a pair from the same die. (Disclaimer) I do not find This to be anything more then suggested. But a interesting piece nuntheless.

  • Insider2Insider2 Posts: 14,452 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I like the coin. Someone should do an overlay with the inverted "9" I cannot recall if the mint was stamping the "195" or just the "19" into the dies at this time.

  • messydeskmessydesk Posts: 20,705 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The date was in the hub, not punched into the die, so this has nothing to do with that. It looks like it could be a die gouge of some sort. Same with the spike on top of the D. As to how it happened, I'll invoke the Fivaz defense, "I don't know I wasn't there at the time." A red, uncirculated coin might provide more clues upon examination.

    John
    Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
  • Insider2Insider2 Posts: 14,452 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @messydesk said:
    The date was in the hub, not punched into the die, so this has nothing to do with that. It looks like it could be a die gouge of some sort. Same with the spike on top of the D. As to how it happened, I'll invoke the Fivaz defense, "I don't know I wasn't there at the time." A red, uncirculated coin might provide more clues upon examination.

    I didn't think the entire date was in the hub during this period but now I think you are correct as that's the way the Mint Lab proved that the 1959 Wheat reverse cent was bogus.

  • JimnightJimnight Posts: 10,846 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited June 17, 2018 5:14PM

    The seventh one down... the 1951-D looks to be a RPM.

  • CRH4LIFECRH4LIFE Posts: 849 ✭✭✭✭

    @Jimnight said:
    The seventh one down... the 1951-D looks to be a RPM.

    It is. A accidental upload of another coin! I will edit it out of there

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Format
SpoilerCodeQuote
Heading 2Heading 1
Emoji
:):D:(;):/:o:s:p:'(:|B):#:*<3o:)>:)
Url
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file
Home • U.S. Coin ForumComment As ...