Looks by the photo that it's 61-62 if the scratch is on the coin, 64-65 if on the holder, but it's really impossible to accurately grade uncirculated coins by a photo.
Collector and dealer in obsolete currency. Always buying all obsolete bank notes and scrip.
You Suck! Awarded 6/2008- 1901-O Micro O Morgan, 8/2008- 1878 VAM-123 Morgan, 9/2022 1888-O VAM-1B3 H8 Morgan | Senior Regional Representative- ANACS Coin Grading. Posted opinions on coins are my own, and are not an official ANACS opinion.
58, but I must add your photos don't make it easy to be confident. They way they are lit make it difficult to judge luster and wear -- the single most important feature in grading AU/MS coins, IMO.
Collector of Large Cents, US Type, and modern pocket change.
I was going to say 63 details scratched. I assume the mark in the earlier pic wasn't on the coin. If so that piece might get into a 3 holder with our host. Opinions?
Comments
AU58
Successful Trades: Swampboy,
+1
Too low.
AU-63
"Keep your malarkey filter in good operating order" -Walter Breen
Scratch on the neck or holder?
Looks by the photo that it's 61-62 if the scratch is on the coin, 64-65 if on the holder, but it's really impossible to accurately grade uncirculated coins by a photo.
I'm thinking an AU-55
neck
62 at best due t the scratch.
I'm thinking they gave it a 58.
55
Yup the classic 58-62 depending on the day......... Although that scratch may have changed the equation, looking forward to the posted grade.
Best, SH
MS60 Details Scratched
AU58
The coin should still grade even if the scratch is on the coin - MS61
Probably as an Unc.; is Mike Fahey still working as a finalizer there?
the angle of the light makes that faint scratch look like the grand canyon. My WAG is 62.
61
58, but I must add your photos don't make it easy to be confident. They way they are lit make it difficult to judge luster and wear -- the single most important feature in grading AU/MS coins, IMO.
Very little wear, dark toning and the one distracting scratch brings it down to a 62-63 imo .
eBay ID-bruceshort978
Successful BST:here and ATS, bumanchu, wdrob, hashtag, KeeNoooo, mikej61, Yonico, Meltdown, BAJJERFAN, Excaliber, lordmarcovan, cucamongacoin, robkool, bradyc, tonedcointrader, mumu, Windycity, astrotrain, tizofthe, overdate, rwyarmch, mkman123, Timbuk3,GBurger717, airplanenut, coinkid855 ,illini420, michaeldixon, Weiss, Morpheus, Deepcoin, Collectorcoins, AUandAG, D.Schwager.
AU53
Everything is all right!
MS62.... Cheers, RickO
ms 62 scratched
55-58
Doesn't "very little wear" knock it out of any UNC grade?
I'll go MS64/5 nice coin.
Hoard the keys.
I know i might be in the minority here but something tells me it's in a 64 holder.
Going against the consensus here: NOT a proof.
I was going to say 63 details scratched. I assume the mark in the earlier pic wasn't on the coin. If so that piece might get into a 3 holder with our host. Opinions?
RIP Mom- 1932-2012
Wow I think it a nice coin. May need a little help on the dark side looking at that last pic.
Hoard the keys.
So......what year is the holder? 04 to 07? Were they conservative or loose back then?
The more qualities observed in a coin, the more desirable that coin becomes!
My Jefferson Nickel Collection