Options
Grade me - 1929-D WLH
KollectorKing
Posts: 4,820 ✭✭✭✭✭


0
KollectorKing
Posts: 4,820 ✭✭✭✭✭


Comments
Well.....AU53
It is tough to grade Mint State and near Mint State coins when you can't see the luster first hand. This is especially true for a coin like this which appears to have its original surfaces.
I see a rub or a disturbance on the high points of Ms. Liberty and on the rock and eagle's let on the reverse. I’m going to say AU-55 on this one. You should not dip this piece. I think that the originality could go a low way toward selling it.
I say AU 58 just based on the photographs. I would also like to take a closer look at those lines in the right facing field. They look like toning streaks but I'm not sure what is underneath.
Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍
My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):
https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/
53
Hard to judge luster from your photos, but it looks like a middle of the road AU coin to me.
50
50 is my grade as well - too much wear, and not enough luster, to be higher....of course on a good day it could slip into a 53 holder I suppose....
AU53 !!!
50 camp
53
AU50... the obverse has considerable wear... The picture does not show any remaining luster and the scratches in the right field are distracting. Cheers, RickO
I'm in the 53 camp.....but I can't find it. Is there a campfire and if so, do you have the stuff for som' mores?
Louis Armstrong
I'm thinking a AU50, but I consider myself a rookie at grading.
Donato
Donato's Complete US Type Set ---- Donato's Dansco 7070 Modified Type Set ---- Donato's Basic U.S. Coin Design Set
Successful transactions: Shrub68 (Jim), MWallace (Mike)
The blackish on one of her high points is a turnoff for sure. au50 I expect.
AU
BHNC #203
Nice original 55.
The negative reactions you see to this coin provide an example of why so many original coins have been dipped.
au 50/53
AU50
AU55
Hoard the keys.
50+/53
If luster is better than the pics it might go 55.