Home U.S. Coin Forum

Do you have a coin that is difficult for you to image?

sparky64sparky64 Posts: 7,048 ✭✭✭✭✭
edited May 10, 2018 3:17PM in U.S. Coin Forum

I take a pic of this one about every 6 months and I'm never completely satisfied with the results.
Although, this one today is one of my better efforts.

"If I say something in the woods and my wife isn't there to hear it.....am I still wrong?"

My Washington Quarter Registry set...in progress

Comments

  • TommyTypeTommyType Posts: 4,586 ✭✭✭✭✭

    More light?

    I only say that because that's usually MY issue. I haven't stumbled onto the right solution yet, however....

    Easily distracted Type Collector
  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 34,848 ✭✭✭✭✭

    This one ... an 1807 quarter that is a very solid AU-55. but the obverse relief is very low, which makes it hard to photograph. The coin has P-L surfaces and might be the only one or a least one of a few very early die states of the Browning 2 variety without any die breaks. I have taken many pictures of this piece, and this is the best pair. Cathernine Bullowa thought that it came from the Brand Collection.


    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • coinsarefuncoinsarefun Posts: 21,760 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Yes, several ones. They are heavily toned with pl fields and impossible to image accurately.
    I think thats the main reason I crossover from NGC to Pcgs just to get the trueview ;):)
    But I also like having the collection on one site too.

  • sparky64sparky64 Posts: 7,048 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @coinsarefun said:
    Yes, several ones. They are heavily toned with pl fields and impossible to image accurately.
    I think thats the main reason I crossover from NGC to Pcgs just to get the trueview ;):)
    But I also like having the collection on one site too.

    Exactly and interesting because the Morgan I showed is designated PL and is very toned on the reverse.

    "If I say something in the woods and my wife isn't there to hear it.....am I still wrong?"

    My Washington Quarter Registry set...in progress

  • coinsarefuncoinsarefun Posts: 21,760 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @sparky64 said:

    @coinsarefun said:

    Exactly and interesting because the Morgan I showed is designated PL and is very toned on the reverse.

    .
    .
    .
    Yep, and sometimes it’s easier before it’s slabbed. And impossible once it’s in plastic

  • jtlee321jtlee321 Posts: 2,365 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I've got a PCGS MS-66RB Lincoln Cent that has been real pain in blank to shoot. I'm going to eventually send it in to PCGS for reconsideration and get a TV of it at that time. It's one of those coins that really needs to be shot raw because of the toning and luster.

  • divecchiadivecchia Posts: 6,688 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Yah, all 9 coins that I own. I suck at photos.

    Donato

    Hobbyist & Collector (not an investor).
    Donato's Complete US Type Set ---- Donato's Dansco 7070 Modified Type Set ---- Donato's Basic U.S. Coin Design Set

    Successful transactions: Shrub68 (Jim), MWallace (Mike)
  • oih82w8oih82w8 Posts: 12,617 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited May 11, 2018 7:53AM

    I have a PL, to me anyway, 1877-S/S 25C that I have been told by a couple of photographers was very hard to capture the details. My Peace Dollar was given a similar critique.

    My imagery is pretty bad, which I why I contract out imagery from those who know how.

    oih82w8 = Oh I Hate To Wait _defectus patientia_aka...Dr. Defecto - Curator of RMO's

    BST transactions: dbldie55, jayPem, 78saen, UltraHighRelief, nibanny, liefgold, FallGuy, lkeigwin, mbogoman, Sandman70gt, keets, joeykoins, ianrussell (@GC), EagleEye, ThePennyLady, GRANDAM, Ilikecolor, Gluggo, okiedude, Voyageur, LJenkins11, fastfreddie, ms70, pursuitofliberty, ZoidMeister,Coin Finder, GotTheBug, edwardjulio, Coinnmore, Nickpatton, Namvet69,...
  • This content has been removed.
  • Wabbit2313Wabbit2313 Posts: 7,268 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I struggle with the round ones.

  • david3142david3142 Posts: 3,609 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited May 10, 2018 7:34PM

    I have a really hard time with toned clad coins. Here are a couple of examples:

    The toning is as colorful on this one at the bottom right as it shows on the top left but I can't light up all of it at the same time and I'm left with a massive glare on the coin.

    Similar story here but the color comes through a bit better.

  • ParadisefoundParadisefound Posts: 8,588 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The extreme reflective mirror proof field without getting other images on so I would angle it but it came out as black :s

  • coinhackcoinhack Posts: 1,183 ✭✭✭✭
    edited May 10, 2018 9:41PM

    @Wabbit2313 said:
    I struggle with the round ones.

    Yes, me too...!

  • lkeigwinlkeigwin Posts: 16,894 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Here are some common mistakes made by those new to coin photography.

    Too little light. This can be overcome by adjusting exposure or brightness with an editor. Don't be shy!

    Poor lighting balance. The image should have uniform lighting. Work the lamps. High and vertical is usually best.

    White balance. Rarely can the camera WB setting be perfected. Use your editor to adjust temperature and tint. A little trial and error will get you proper settings you can use again and again.

    Over-correcting with the editor. Too much contrast unnaturally darkens. Sharpening pixilates and should never be necessary. Shun saturation and luminance adjustments. None of these editor tweaks improves the image if you seek accurate renditions.

    Autofocus. It picks up on slab imperfections. Use manual focus and zero-in on the fields, not devices.

    Condemning results before editor adjustments. The goal is accurate images. There is nothing wrong with making post processing adjustments if they result in more realistic pictures.
    Lance.

  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    All my coins are difficult to photograph.....not for others, just for me. ;) Coin photography is just not an area I can pursue...too many other interests.... so, I rely on phone pictures my wife takes for the most part...Cheers, RickO

  • ashelandasheland Posts: 23,790 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I have a very flashy PCGS MS65 81-S Morgan that is tough, my Indian $5 gold was difficult as well.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file