uuu
SeattleSlammer
Posts: 10,112 ✭✭✭✭✭
...
6
SeattleSlammer
Posts: 10,112 ✭✭✭✭✭
SeattleSlammer
Posts: 10,112 ✭✭✭✭✭
Comments
What do I think? It's beautiful!
In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson
Love the color.
Successful transactions with: JimTyler, Morgan13, ChangeInHistory, LukeMarshall, Old_Collector, basets , MICHAELDIXON, Waverlycoins, dsessom, privatecoin, SurfinxHI, ZoidMeister, giorgioll, Lakesammman, Twobitcollector, Cazkaboom, Dscoin, Shrub68, CoinHunter4, Cladiator, coinbuf, Elkevvo, ChrisH82, WindyCity, Kccoin, NumisOxide, Meltdown, blaircountycoin, blue62vette, greencopper, Kliao, Downtown1974, BankerBob56, coinlieutenant, cucamongacoin, FranklinFactory, scooter25, erwindoc, bigjpst, and others.
66 no bands, pretty coin but some disturbances on the surfaces
rainbowroosie April 1, 2003
66
I’ll go 66FB. There’s a hit on the central bands but I think they are split enough to still get the designation.
Very nice Merc...
Have no idea for grade but I'll take it any day
Probably a 66 with that coloration, the bands look split on my monitor.
Pete
Louis Armstrong
65, no FB
64 no bands
66+FB. Beauty.
- Bob -
MPL's - Lincolns of Color
Central Valley Roosevelts
Gorgeous Merc....MS 66. Close call on the bands but they do look rather complete.
Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍
My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):
https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/
Yikes!!!!
CC
Very nice!... 66 FB
MS64, no bands...pretty though. I clicked on the image to see the full size, had others done the same I think many of their guesses would be different.
Lol, I hope I am at least close to being right.
Not really looking for much these days but if I were, it might be a toner.
I think you should send that to me as a belated birthday present! It's nice
I've been told I tolerate fools poorly...that may explain things if I have a problem with you. Current ebay items - Nothing at the moment
MONSTER, MONSTER, MONSTER.
Dave
65 all day long
I guess it depends on just how bad that disturbance on the neck is. Combine that with its other issues it just might only numberically grade 64. Maybe a bump to 65 for color. Regardless, an awesome looking little jewel.
m
Fellas, leave the tight pants to the ladies. If I can count the coins in your pockets you better use them to call a tailor. Stay thirsty my friends......
I won’t ruin it for you. Glad you enjoy it, if you haven’t received it in hand yet, she’s gorgeous!
~Midwest Coin Exchange
Vivid_coins
66fb
Successful Trades: Swampboy,
I would grade it a technical 64 due to the issues in the field in front of Liberty's face and on her cheek can neck. A color bump to 65 and I think it would get the FB designation. So 65FB is my guess.
65 no FB
MS65.... no FB..... Great year....
Cheers, RickO
64 no FB.Super eye appeal.
I'm with the 66FB folks. She is gorgeous ! ! !
1947-P & D; 1948-D; 1949-P & S; 1950-D & S; and 1952-S.
Any help locating any of these OBW rolls would be gratefully appreciated!
66 almost FB
"Inspiration exists, but it has to find you working" Pablo Picasso
63 or 64 no bands. Might even be 58.
I think it is in the low to mid 60 but also feel it has great color.
Best place to buy !
Bronze Associate member
64+FB
MS65
65+ no FB. Color gets a point, not quite FB but very close.
65, not FB.
Gonna get me a $50 Octagonal someday. Some. Day.
Since it has nice color and PCGS graded it I’ll say 66+FB.
Looks more like a technical 64 no bands to me.
66fb
There’s a hit on the middle bands, dead center, that probably lost the FB. And no color/luster bump given! Thanks for playing folks, and thanks Eeyore84 for a cool coin.