Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Okay, one other find I MUST ask about....

This is NOT a 1982 D . It's just a regular 1982 ,or what APPEARS to be. It also APPEARS to be a 1983, or 1985 ..... I see some type if repunch in the background of the 2 in the date. You can see it under the hood of the 2 on top and around the back bottom corner space. You can pretty much see it everywhere ... I am no expert, but this looks like a punch if a date and then another on top (just the 2) ???






Comments

  • yosclimberyosclimber Posts: 5,046 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited May 1, 2018 6:52PM

    If you are seeing raised metal on the lower right side of the 2,
    it could be caused by a "die chip".
    These are relatively common, although interesting.

    If you are seeing something on the center left side of the 2,
    is it raised or depressed from the regular surface of the coin?

  • TommyTypeTommyType Posts: 4,586 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The discoloration around that digit leads me to believe someone was messing with it. To what end, I don't know.

    But the damage(?) to the digit combined with the color seems to indicate "post mint".

    Easily distracted Type Collector
  • SeanBSeanB Posts: 80

    Yes I do see it on the center left side. I examined it well, it doesn't seem to have scratches to be post mint caused by altering in circulation. It seems to be slightly raised, not as much as the 2 but it also is completely underneath the 2.

  • yosclimberyosclimber Posts: 5,046 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Thanks for answering.
    If it's slightly raised, then there should have been a corresponding depression in the die.
    It could be caused by a die clash, or by a narrow and very hard object striking the die.

  • blitzdudeblitzdude Posts: 6,550 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Looks like a poor attempt to turn a 83 Lincoln into an 82. Maybe the Chinese thought they could double their money for a .02 cent copper vs a .01 cent zinc. lulz

    The whole worlds off its rocker, buy Gold™.
    BOOMIN!™
    Wooooha! Did someone just say it's officially "TACO™" Tuesday????

  • mannie graymannie gray Posts: 7,259 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Damaged.

  • AzurescensAzurescens Posts: 2,783 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @blitzdude said:
    Looks like a poor attempt to turn a 83 Lincoln into an 82. Maybe the Chinese thought they could double their money for a .02 cent copper vs a .01 cent zinc. lulz

    Yup, a copper 1983.. open your wallets..

  • Timbuk3Timbuk3 Posts: 11,658 ✭✭✭✭✭

    :) !!!

    Timbuk3
  • FredWeinbergFredWeinberg Posts: 5,925 ✭✭✭✭✭

    DD

    Damaged Digit

    Retired Collector & Dealer in Major Mint Error Coins & Currency since the 1960's.Co-Author of Whitman's "100 Greatest U.S. Mint Error Coins", and the Error Coin Encyclopedia, Vols., III & IV. Retired Authenticator for Major Mint Errors for PCGS. A 50+ Year PNG Member.A full-time numismatist since 1972, retired in 2022.
  • CoinPhysicistCoinPhysicist Posts: 603 ✭✭✭✭

    Anyone else wondering if this is same guy that was posting all those 'is this a double die' or 'is this anything other than normal pocket change' under a new username?

    Successful transactions with: wondercoin, Tetromibi, PerryHall, PlatinumDuck, JohnMaben/Pegasus Coin & Jewelry, CoinFlip, and coinlieutenant.

  • sellitstoresellitstore Posts: 3,053 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I'll offer my first thought which is a different theory.

    Foreign substance. Look at the discoloration around the date.

    Take a wooden toothpick and try to flick off some of the substance. If it comes off, that's your answer. If not, a wooden toothpick won't damage your coin.

    Collector and dealer in obsolete currency. Always buying all obsolete bank notes and scrip.
  • JimnightJimnight Posts: 10,846 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited May 2, 2018 9:36AM

    Damaged.

  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I agree with Fred and Jim... damaged coin.... Cheers, RickO

  • SeanBSeanB Posts: 80

    Well thanks for answering... How is it not possibly a repunch? I'm not arguing, I am b> @CoinPhysicist said:

    Anyone else wondering if this is same guy that was posting all those 'is this a double die' or 'is this anything other than normal pocket change' under a new username?

    No I am not. I'm done asking about D's . I promise .

  • HydrantHydrant Posts: 7,773 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited May 9, 2018 3:13PM

    @CoinPhysicist said:
    Anyone else wondering if this is same guy that was posting all those 'is this a double die' or 'is this anything other than normal pocket change' under a new username?

    No.

  • ACopACop Posts: 1,479 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The 2 itself looks weird even if you ignore whats under it. I thought 1983 formed into a 2 right away also. And the chinese theory seems valid. I think technically it woul be worth something like 2.2x a non copper? If anyone can find an efficient way to make 1983 pennies into 1982 forgeries and profit it's the chinese. They probably went after the .2 as profit after costs.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file