Home U.S. Coin Forum

1936 PR65RB

Who owns this coin?

Jason Wendt

~Midwest Coin Exchange
Vivid_coins

Comments

  • PTVETTERPTVETTER Posts: 6,028 ✭✭✭✭✭

    not me

    Pat Vetter,Mercury Dime registry set,1938 Proof set registry,Pat & BJ Coins:724-325-7211


  • Eeyore84Eeyore84 Posts: 80 ✭✭✭

    ^

    Jason Wendt

    ~Midwest Coin Exchange
    Vivid_coins
  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Definitely not mine... :D;) Cheers, RickO

  • Timbuk3Timbuk3 Posts: 11,658 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I dunno !!! B)

    Timbuk3
  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 34,838 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I have one with similar colors that is probably not as nice since it's graded PR-65, BN

    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • braddickbraddick Posts: 24,829 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Sweet and tasty looking!

    peacockcoins

  • Eeyore84Eeyore84 Posts: 80 ✭✭✭

    Paying $500 finders fee if acquired!

    Jason Wendt

    ~Midwest Coin Exchange
    Vivid_coins
  • Eeyore84Eeyore84 Posts: 80 ✭✭✭

    ^

    Jason Wendt

    ~Midwest Coin Exchange
    Vivid_coins
  • RogerBRogerB Posts: 8,852 ✭✭✭✭✭

    1936 Satin proofs will show more detail than brilliant proofs. This is because die polishing removed fine details.

  • giorgio11giorgio11 Posts: 3,950 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Alas, not mine.

    Kind regards,

    George

    VDBCoins.com Our Registry Sets Many successful BSTs; pls ask.
  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 34,838 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @RogerB said:
    1936 Satin proofs will show more detail than brilliant proofs. This is because die polishing removed fine details.

    Quite true. I recently bought a high grade 1936 Satin Finish Proof Nickel. The coin has the best presentation of Fraser Indian / Bufflalo Nickel design that I have ever seen. It is nicer than the 1913 two Matte Proof nickels I have and the 1937 Proof Nickel I've collected as a type piece. It is a very attractive coin, and I paid quite a bit less for it than I would have paid for the 1936 nickel in brilliant Proof.

    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 34,838 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @RogerB said:
    1936 Satin proofs will show more detail than brilliant proofs. This is because die polishing removed fine details.

    Quite true. I recently bought a high grade 1936 Satin Finish Proof Nickel. The coin has the best presentation of Fraser Indian / Bufflalo Nickel design that I have ever seen. It is nicer than the 1913 two Matte Proof nickels I have and the 1937 Proof Nickel I've collected as a type piece. It is a very attractive coin, and I paid quite a bit less for it than I would have paid for the 1936 nickel in brilliant Proof.

    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • RogerBRogerB Posts: 8,852 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Those who have a copy of the book United States Proof Coins 1936-1942 can check page 104 where 1916 and 1936 proof cents are illustrated. Other illustrations show the differences between Satin and Brilliant 1936 proofs.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file