New Error Morgan Dollar back from grading!

GeorgesCoins · October 17, 2017 11:30AM

Here is the Morgan I just got back from my last submission. It's an error, 1921 Struck Thru Obverse. It graded just as expected, MS62.

Insider2 · October 17, 2017 11:39AM

Fantastic! Note the type of original luster inside the error is different.

ZJantiques · October 17, 2017 11:50AM

neat

Treashunt · October 17, 2017 11:54AM

nice, but how is it a 62?
How can they grade that obverse?
or just use the reverse? Which looks far nicer than 62.

Insider2 · October 17, 2017 2:02PM

@Treashunt said:
nice, but how is it a 62?
How can they grade that obverse?
or just use the reverse? Which looks far nicer than 62.

Perhaps because the coin's Eye Appeal is only "generally acceptable."

CascadeChris · October 17, 2017 4:16PM

Nice. Even being a 21 (errors abound) this one should command a decent premium for a greaser. The "wow" factor is there

CascadeChris · October 17, 2017 4:19PM

@Treashunt said:
nice, but how is it a 62?
How can they grade that obverse?
or just use the reverse? Which looks far nicer than 62.

Easily. Just like any other. Determine the amount of surface contact marks to assign numerical grade. However with this one the reverse was used to determine MS from AU. I agree with 62.

Rampage · October 17, 2017 6:43PM

Very nice indeed. Congrats on the pick up!

Unknown · October 17, 2017 7:11PM

This content has been removed.

CascadeChris · October 17, 2017 7:21PM

@afford said:
Cool piece. but I don't trust TPG's when grading these, although I don't think the grade really matters other than it is definitely ms.

Why not? The grade of 62 is correct and obvious. It's not bad enough for a 61 and not good enough for a 63.

CyndieChildress · October 17, 2017 7:22PM

Nice!

Timbuk3 · October 18, 2017 12:19AM

Sweet !!!

thebeav · October 18, 2017 3:43AM

Neat coin....Helps you imagine what a Morgan would look like with no obverse lettering.

GeorgesCoins · October 18, 2017 4:44AM

Thanks everyone! I really like this piece too!

GeorgesCoins · October 18, 2017 4:45AM

@CascadeChris said:

@Treashunt said:
nice, but how is it a 62?
How can they grade that obverse?
or just use the reverse? Which looks far nicer than 62.

Easily. Just like any other. Determine the amount of surface contact marks to assign numerical grade. However with this one the reverse was used to determine MS from AU. I agree with 62.

I also agree with the 62 grade. I think they used the reverse and what ever was left on the obverse.

ricko · October 18, 2017 6:39AM

Neat error.... I agree with the grade, though that is really secondary in this case....Cheers, RickO

asheland · October 18, 2017 9:55AM

That's a nice one!

silverpop · October 18, 2017 10:25AM

error coin

Unknown · October 18, 2017 10:33AM

This content has been removed.

CascadeChris · October 18, 2017 11:20AM

@afford said:

@CascadeChris said:

@afford said:
Cool piece. but I don't trust TPG's when grading these, although I don't think the grade really matters other than it is definitely ms.

Why not? The grade of 62 is correct and obvious. It's not bad enough for a 61 and not good enough for a 63.

I agree with you, but just not buying for the grade, buying it for the mint state ms error package, so if it is ms 60 to ms64 who cares.

I see your point but I would pay more for a 63-64 over a 60-62. And I would pay more for a 65 and beyond (generally speaking) than a 63-64. So does grade matter, yes.

New Error Morgan Dollar back from grading!

Comments

Leave a Comment