New Error Morgan Dollar back from grading!
Here is the Morgan I just got back from my last submission. It's an error, 1921 Struck Thru Obverse. It graded just as expected, MS62.





Comments
-
Fantastic! Note the type of original luster inside the error is different.
2 -
-
nice, but how is it a 62?
How can they grade that obverse?
or just use the reverse? Which looks far nicer than 62.Frank
BHNC #2033 -
@Treashunt said:
nice, but how is it a 62?
How can they grade that obverse?
or just use the reverse? Which looks far nicer than 62.Perhaps because the coin's Eye Appeal is only "generally acceptable."
1 -
Nice. Even being a 21 (errors abound) this one should command a decent premium for a greaser. The "wow" factor is there
The more you VAM..2 -
@Treashunt said:
nice, but how is it a 62?
How can they grade that obverse?
or just use the reverse? Which looks far nicer than 62.Easily. Just like any other. Determine the amount of surface contact marks to assign numerical grade. However with this one the reverse was used to determine MS from AU. I agree with 62.
The more you VAM..1 -
Very nice indeed. Congrats on the pick up!
1 -
This content has been removed.
-
@afford said:
Cool piece. but I don't trust TPG's when grading these, although I don't think the grade really matters other than it is definitely ms.Why not? The grade of 62 is correct and obvious. It's not bad enough for a 61 and not good enough for a 63.
The more you VAM..2 -
Nice!
1 -
Sweet !!!
Timbuk31 -
Neat coin....Helps you imagine what a Morgan would look like with no obverse lettering.
2 -
Thanks everyone! I really like this piece too!
0 -
@CascadeChris said:
@Treashunt said:
nice, but how is it a 62?
How can they grade that obverse?
or just use the reverse? Which looks far nicer than 62.Easily. Just like any other. Determine the amount of surface contact marks to assign numerical grade. However with this one the reverse was used to determine MS from AU. I agree with 62.
I also agree with the 62 grade. I think they used the reverse and what ever was left on the obverse.
1 -
Neat error.... I agree with the grade, though that is really secondary in this case....Cheers, RickO
0 -
-
This content has been removed.
-
This content has been removed.
-
@afford said:
@CascadeChris said:
@afford said:
Cool piece. but I don't trust TPG's when grading these, although I don't think the grade really matters other than it is definitely ms.Why not? The grade of 62 is correct and obvious. It's not bad enough for a 61 and not good enough for a 63.
I agree with you, but just not buying for the grade, buying it for the mint state ms error package, so if it is ms 60 to ms64 who cares.
I see your point but I would pay more for a 63-64 over a 60-62. And I would pay more for a 65 and beyond (generally speaking) than a 63-64. So does grade matter, yes.
The more you VAM..1
Leave a Comment
Categories
- All Categories
- 520K Coins and Currency - PCGS
- 328.5K U.S. Coin Forum
- 14.8K PCGS Set Registry Forum
- 5.2K Q & A Forum
- 41.4K World & Ancient Coins Forum
- 3K U.S. & World Currency Forum
- 96.4K Buy, Sell, & Trade - U.S. Coins
- 7.3K Buy, Sell & Trade - World & Ancient Coins
- 1.5K Buy, Sell & Trade - Currency
- 60 Random
- 246.2K Trading Cards, Autographs and Memorabilia - PSA
- 90.3K Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum
- 1.7K Autographs Forum
- 16.4K PSA Set Registry Forum
- 22K Sports Talk
- 115K Buy, Sell & Trade - Cards & Memorabilia
- 663 Buy, Sell & Trade - Autographs
- 2.2K Stamps
- 1.5K Stamps Forum
- 670 Buy, Sell & Trade - Stamps
- 83 Coin Shows
- 83 General Coin Show Information and Discussion
- 11.9K Misc
- 11.9K Testing Forum





