Both are viewed as "brown." The fact that at least the second one has luster showing, which is required for the Mint State grades, has nothing to do with the color designation.
Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
Thanks sometimes i have to check my eyes, i have seen wheats this color in slabs marked red, they look brown to me too. I'll see if i can get some better pictures when i get my picture studio set up.Wait till you see that!
@Davideo said:
While lighting, white balance, exposure, etc. can all make difference, the Lincoln and the IHCs do not appear to be even close in color.
+1, both brown and the first IH seems to have been cleaned in the past.
Comments
Both are viewed as "brown." The fact that at least the second one has luster showing, which is required for the Mint State grades, has nothing to do with the color designation.
Even if I suspect the white balance might be off, which I am not certain it is by very much, both coins appear brown (BN) to me.
In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson
BN -Brown... I do not detect any RD at all... Cheers, RickO
They look beige on my monitor.
Thanks sometimes i have to check my eyes, i have seen wheats this color in slabs marked red, they look brown to me too. I'll see if i can get some better pictures when i get my picture studio set up.Wait till you see that!
Definitely brown
This is an example of the wheats i was talking about
While lighting, white balance, exposure, etc. can all make difference, the Lincoln and the IHCs do not appear to be even close in color.
+1, both brown and the first IH seems to have been cleaned in the past.
https://pcgs.com/setregistry/showcase/2819