Could this be a ms-65 or ms-66
Watchbelieve
Posts: 527 ✭✭✭
0
Watchbelieve
Posts: 527 ✭✭✭
Watchbelieve
Posts: 527 ✭✭✭
Comments
Can't tell with these images.
...here ya go
Was busy doin other things and was not paying attention to the cut and paste, LOL. I retract my statement from this post.
Only one way to find out.
It 'could' be a 65....hard to say with that tarnish.....Cheers, RickO
It's probably more like an MS-64 if it has not had something done to it to make it brighter. The photo you superimposed over the picture of the slab does not help us grade the coin. Sometimes the photos of the whole slab with the actual coin shown provide a useful view.
He cut and pasted my pic in a fake slab
I see it as more of an attractive 64 coin. Not to say it couldn't go MS65. Identifying marks and field chatter with those photos is not easy.
ms64.
"“Those who sacrifice liberty for security/safety deserve neither.“(Benjamin Franklin)
"I only golf on days that end in 'Y'" (DE59)
Don't know but if it looks as good as the images it's a very nice piece.
Coins with toning are very difficult to grade from a photo. The toning will hide grade effecting defects based upon the angle of the photo. From the photo of your coin I think MS65 is maximum.
OINK
Might be a 65 if those aren't scratches on the eagle's breast.
it's crackers to slip a rozzer the dropsy in snide
Looks 64 to me.
Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍
My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):
https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/
I agree with attractive 64.
Collector, occasional seller
Send it to our hosts and find out.
63 or 64 for me. Can't tell if it's PL. Plain old cell phone shot would help.
No. The hits in front of the eye, to the right of the eye and the cheek dig reduce this common date coin to MS 64.
I like the coin
Hard grading from a photo, but it looks like it could go MS66PL.
the cheek looks rounded and min marks.