GTG - 1944-D WLH
KollectorKing
Posts: 4,820 ✭✭✭✭✭
0
KollectorKing
Posts: 4,820 ✭✭✭✭✭
KollectorKing
Posts: 4,820 ✭✭✭✭✭
Comments
58
65
Tough pictures to grade from .... could well be a 65.... Cheers, RickO
Old holder 63 shot 64, due to the numerous little ticks and light abrasions on the obverse.
Modern day 65.
Ms64 is my guess
Feel Free to Check out my eBay Listings
stores.ebay.com/DoubleJCoins?_trksid=p2047675.l2563
My first thought was MS63, but the pics make it a little difficult.
65 for me.
64 Here. Nice one.
My YouTube Channel
Light scattered marks, good strike and luster. Looks like minimal friction. OH 64 for me
64
65
Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍
My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):
https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/
MS65...
Probably graded 60 as it looks like it has reeding marks as well as some rub on the high points of the obverse; specifically the breasts, upper leg, and even the sun. The reverse looks better. Hard to be sure as looking at a picture.
Today this coin would probably grade 62 or 63.
I'm thinking MS64 on this one.
Louis Armstrong
Would fit well in a Everyman set.
Yesssssssssssss
63 I'd guess
Must be some light rub on breast and head.
I think it would at least 63, on a good day, if resubmitted today.
Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍
My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):
https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/
I don't think I'll ever resubmit it since it's in a rattler slab.
58
I'd leave it alone, also (too much risk).
Strike is well above average for a '44-D.
Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍
My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):
https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/
ms64+
"Look up, old boy, and see what you get." -William Bonney.