What do you think of this 1890 Morgan? Grade Opinions

Kyle · August 14, 2017 12:06AM

What do you think of my latest purchase?

Kove · August 14, 2017 12:22AM

AU 55

ricko · August 14, 2017 4:36AM

The dark tarnish appears to be hiding some field scratches...especially on the reverse... hard to say how bad they are, definite wear/rub on feathers and hair.... anywhere from 55-61.... Cheers, RickO

slider23 · August 14, 2017 5:04AM

45

Unknown · August 14, 2017 6:45AM

This content has been removed.

Walkerfan · August 14, 2017 6:58AM

63

roadrunner · August 14, 2017 8:27AM

63/64. Probably too heavily toned with muted luster to ever see a 65 grade...regardless of how clean it might be.

Soldi · August 14, 2017 9:29AM

Nice coin, looks original market price worth it's grade as an MS63 coin aka $90. coin. Only friction point I see is on the top fold of the cap, typical cheek marks. I don't discount for that which was never there, but the strike is weak and it will not 65. Honestly, 40 years ago we called coins like this AU or sliders due to wing tips and hair, but things change. They shouldn't, but they do.

asheland · August 14, 2017 10:03AM

Nice coin, 63

Kyle · August 14, 2017 10:37AM

@roadrunner said:
63/64. Probably too heavily toned with muted luster to ever see a 65 grade...regardless of how clean it might be.

I saw a quick video of the coin - The luster isn't blazing like you would see on a 1881-S Morgan, but it's not bad.

These are the seller's pictures:

Wolf359 · August 14, 2017 9:13PM

64 max unless the luster demands better.

mannie gray · August 14, 2017 9:23PM

FadetoBlack's pic makes it look like a 55/58 to me.

What do you think of this 1890 Morgan? Grade Opinions

Comments

Leave a Comment

Categories