I just viewed Bob Campbell's ANA Video on toning and have a request.

I just watched the video and wonder if members can add to it. What are some of the characteristics you use to determine if a coin has natural toning? Additionally, what do you look for on coins that indicate possible AT?
To keep this simple and avoid lots of repetition, let's try this. Use a plus (+) sign for characteristics of NT and a minus (-) sign for AT. I'll go first with two obvious replies:
(+) Pull-away toning at the base of the relief toward the edges of the coin.
(-) Brown colored toning in the field that "flows" around parts of the relief.
Hopefully, we can keep this format so I can copy the answers. No need to post one + or one - as I did above. I'd like to read as many plus and minus characteristics as you all know. Images with each characteristic you write about would be very helpfull. I'll add mine to this thread tomorrow when I can get to my camera.
If this goes as planned, you and I should all learn a great deal about toning from the experts here on CU.
Comments
You have two bullets not a plus and minus
ANA 50 year/Life Member (now "Emeritus")
Let me tell you two things about your post.
A: you are correct
and
2: I have nothing to add
The forum software assumes that a leading + or - is really meant to be a bullet. If you precede them with a \ character, then this behavior is suppressed. I edited the quote from @Insider2, but he can edit the original.
- Smurf-vomit blue patches on a circulated coin.
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
Eye appeal and toning are the hardest aspects of grading to quantify. Splotchy is (sometimes) bad. Appropriate color is good. Innapropriate color is bad. What is appropriate? It depends.
No toning at all can be great or horrible, depending on context (BU Peace dollar vs dull, circulated 1800s silver).
Traditional album toning is often good. 58-D mint set toning is generally good while the exact same look on other coins would be innapropriate. Etc. etc.
Computer did it. Guess we need to put the +, - into ( ) per my edited post.
@BryceM Thanks for taking the time to reply I wanted to read SPECIFIC characteristics as Bob gave in his video. That way, the posts here would be like a "mini-seminar" on toning for all of us less informed collectors. I guess your post should be (so I can understand it):
(+) Traditional album toning (?) is good. But what does it look like?
(+ & -) Splotchy is either good or bad.
(+) Appropriate color (?) What is appropriate color?
(-) Inappropriate color (?)...ditto.
Thanks again!
Thanks for keeping an eye on me. To whomever edited my post just now THANKS! I was going back to do it myself. LOL.
This is clear as mud.
A (+) sign for NT, and a (-) for NT. What?
Maybe we can also post an (&) for NT, and a ($) for NT?
-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-
My sets: [280+ horse coins] :: [France Sowers] :: [Colorful world copper] :: [Beautiful world coins]
-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-
LOL. @messydesk figured it out just fine! Now, this from you? I am really disappointed. I hoped to learn something and start a very educational discussion for all of us less knowledgeable members. @brg5658, Do you know anything about toning or are you just cranky and trolling around today?
Your post makes no sense. You've told folks to post using two different symbols, both for NT. We coin folks are in general a detail-oriented lot. I'm not trolling -- I'm just telling you that your post makes no sense as written. Period.
-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-
My sets: [280+ horse coins] :: [France Sowers] :: [Colorful world copper] :: [Beautiful world coins]
-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-
Re-read the second paragraph of your original post, where it says, "... minus (-) sign for NT ...." Say to yourself, "oops," then edit it to say, "minus (-) sign for AT ..." and all will be well.
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
I think he is just poking at you since you used a (+) and a (-) for NT in your original post. Assuming you mean (+) for characteristics of NT and (-) for characteristics of AT?
Collector, occasional seller
So, artificial toning is on the surface in the fields, lays on top of the coins surface not into the coins surface. It lacks depth.
-So if the toning is over marks or hairlines, it is usually AT
Link to the video please?
This is my first attempt on an ASE, i put it in a cardboard mailer one month ago. (With a special sauce)

I know Its butt ugly, but I think with practice ....i could get those blues and purples to pop.
eBay ID-bruceshort978
Successful BST:here and ATS, bumanchu, wdrob, hashtag, KeeNoooo, mikej61, Yonico, Meltdown, BAJJERFAN, Excaliber, lordmarcovan, cucamongacoin, robkool, bradyc, tonedcointrader, mumu, Windycity, astrotrain, tizofthe, overdate, rwyarmch, mkman123, Timbuk3,GBurger717, airplanenut, coinkid855 ,illini420, michaeldixon, Weiss, Morpheus, Deepcoin, Collectorcoins, AUandAG, D.Schwager.
....as many have before you.
YIKES! I apologize to you @brg5658. I read your post quickly as abuse or making a joke. May I please have some more disagrees! Thanks to you, I have made the correction.
Now, @messydesk, I'm worried that you understood what I wrote...LOL.
@thebigeng said: " -So if the toning is over marks or hairlines, it is usually AT."
I don't think this is a valid characteristic of AT.
Here are two images. One is "pull-away" I think that is what it is called. The other is AT showing "bubble" pattern as chemical dried. Still looking for one with "toning flow" to post.
( + ) When it's done artfully and skillfully.
( - ) When it's done artfully and skillfully.
Meyhrig, Wayte Raymond, sulfur, horse glue, eye of newt, the salt breezes off the Gulf of Mexico and the pollen that gets underneath that windowsill.
You should see the report and list JA got from the PNG Coin Doctoring Definition Committee.
@ColonelJessup said: "You should see the report and list JA got from the PNG Coin Doctoring Definition Committee."
Thanks! I agree that I should see it...LOL. As a PNG member, perhaps I can get a copy.
ROFLMAO. I'm not a PNG member.
Maybe I wrote the uncondensed version, but I ceded rights to the Numismatic Consumer Alliance.
John Albanese is eager to hear stories, see results.
Yeah, it happens once in a while.
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
So what's the story, a bunch of different things people put on their coins?
@Insider2 Pull away and elevation chromatics are two of the biggies I look for along with the depth or thickness of the thin film interference. Here's a link to some very informative info that was probably parroted in the video you saw. Although there are plenty of "experts" on the boards that will tell you they are all done by docs...and coins don't naturally tone that way because they have seen it done before their very eyes. http://www.jhonecash.com/coins/tonedmorgans.asp#ntvsat
Thanks, I have this site in my favorites.
(+) Elevation chromatics.
Maybe ten years ago, an 1838 25c NGC MS67 appears in a Stacks auction.
Gene Gardner's coin dealer/physician - "You did that! Great job"
"Noooooo......."
"C'mon, you did that!"
"Nooooooo......... "
Next day, I brought in the catalogue from the 1985 Jimmy Hayes Sale.
"I didn't do that! That's why it gets done!"
???? Remember, I'm mentally challenged. I really enjoy your stories but most of the time I'm at a loss.
Did someone believe you conserved a coin to raise its eye appeal? I understand that there were before and after images, right?
Rick, PLEASE WRITE A BOOK, or just write or record your experiences somewhere to be revealed only at your death.
Noooo, the images were the same. It was the mind of the viewer that was changed.
@MrEureka , knowing this individual, doubts that it changed much at all.
I would, if I knew how to linkify, post the image. If I knew (a few PMs of coaching might help, PLEASE), I still couldn't. Most SB, ANR and Stacks images are unavailable because that company's management has been too cheap (or simply cares too little) to consolidate their archives.
CJ - Did you sell the coin to Jimmy? Just curious.
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
Sold it to those Chapman boys for $6.50 and lost track of it
What we're losing track of is that natural toning can, in some instances, be mimicked (and/or enhanced).
Resulting in "Throwing the baby out with the bathwater" - as @Ezmoney notes, in both directions.
Never fear, the Newman Numismatic Portal has taken care of this. All older Stacks catalogs are available, including this one. This link should take you to the lot in question (Lot 38 -- top of left page).
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
Where is this video?
The toning video can be requested from the ANA Library if you are a member.
link?
Happened to find it in Heritage's Jan 2009 FUN auction with no auction history noted. Appears to be unchanged since the 1985 Jimmy Hayes sale catalog. There are color pictures in that catalog which @messydesk linked above. Here is a direct link to the color plate which can be enlarged.
https://archive.org/stream/jimmyhayescollec1985stac#page/n3/mode/2up
Lot description link Heritage's Jan 2009 FUN. The Heritage close up photos look very washed out. I'm guessing the whole slab photos are more accurate. To me, the coin looks like old album toning or are there other old storage methods that could look like that?
https://coins.ha.com/itm/seated-quarters/1838-25c-no-drapery-ms67-ngc/a/1121-3738.s?hdnJumpToLot=1x=0&y=0
.
.
"To Be Esteemed Be Useful" - 1792 Birch Cent --- "I personally think we developed language because of our deep need to complain." - Lily Tomlin
Sorry, you'll need to do the searching for yourselves as I am computer illiterate.
Characteristic shmaracteristic. Means, motive and opportunity are the primary warning signals. See the forest, even if the trees are in the way.
"Everything is on its way to somewhere. Everything." - George Malley, Phenomenon
http://www.american-legacy-coins.com
The archived threads here by Sunnywood about toning should be a revelation to you, I2
"Everything is on its way to somewhere. Everything." - George Malley, Phenomenon
http://www.american-legacy-coins.com
One of the very best Indian Cent toners used a method so simple it would make you cry from laughing so hard. I swore to God I would never divulge that trick.
"Everything is on its way to somewhere. Everything." - George Malley, Phenomenon
http://www.american-legacy-coins.com
I was in Bob Campbell's "Counterfeit and Altered Coin Detection" course at the A.N.A. summer seminar a decade ago, when he staged a live phone call for the class with a "Dr. X" who allegedly was the master of deceiving the TPG's for a long time on ATed Morgan Dollars. The guy talked very candidly about how lucrative his practice was, with absolutely no reservations. Some of us were speechless to hear the numbers that were being thrown around like it was status quo. I actually thought Bob expected some of us to start yelling at the guy and creating a mob scene.
"Everything is on its way to somewhere. Everything." - George Malley, Phenomenon
http://www.american-legacy-coins.com
I always heard that in order to detect altered coins you should know how they are made. Bob knows a lot. I never got to take his class.
What do we use for coins that are AT but in straight graded slabs?
@cameonut2011 said: "What do we use for coins that are AT but in straight graded slabs?"
First, make sure a toning color and pattern that was formerly considered AT has not become market acceptable. Then, when you are sure you are correct, the power of the pen and purse!
I had a 1795 half from the Hayes sale that was tooled, but it took the BHNC guys 20 years to figure out that it was. I bought it cheap, then sold it cheap with full disclosure to a dealer, I'm willing to bet that it's now in a straight grade holder.