Home› U.S. Coin Forum
Options

NEWP - 1859 3CS Type III - What do you think? - GTG (PCGS) - Grade posted

oih82w8oih82w8 Posts: 13,328 ✭✭✭✭✭
edited July 25, 2017 7:13AM in U.S. Coin Forum

I picked up a Type III 3CS recently and wanted to see what the forum members had to say about the grade in comparison to what PCGS bestowed on it.

Thank you for your interest and comments!


oih82w8 = Oh I Hate To Wait _defectus patientia_aka...Dr. Defecto - Curator of RMO's

BST transactions: dbldie55, jayPem, 78saen, UltraHighRelief, nibanny, liefgold, FallGuy, lkeigwin, mbogoman, Sandman70gt, keets, joeykoins, ianrussell (@GC), EagleEye, ThePennyLady, GRANDAM, Ilikecolor, Gluggo, okiedude, Voyageur, LJenkins11, fastfreddie, ms70, pursuitofliberty, ZoidMeister,Coin Finder, GotTheBug, edwardjulio, Coinnmore, Nickpatton, Namvet69,...

Comments

  • Options
    ScarsdaleCoinScarsdaleCoin Posts: 5,446 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 24, 2017 7:33AM

    Any trime is a nice trime with that said one can not really comment from your pic intelligently

    Jon Lerner - Scarsdale Coin - www.CoinHelp.com
  • Options
    TommyTypeTommyType Posts: 4,586 ✭✭✭✭✭

    These are tough because pictures inevitably blow the tiny coins up into dinner plate size, and any imperfections end up looking like gaping caverns. :)

    I'm riding the fence between AU-58, and MS-63, and can't bring myself to resolve the obvious gap in my range. One of those cases where even good pictures probably won't take the place of having it in hand....(Or, I'm just inept....take your pick). :smiley:

    Easily distracted Type Collector
  • Options
    mannie graymannie gray Posts: 7,259 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @TommyType said:
    These are tough because pictures inevitably blow the tiny coins up into dinner plate size, and any imperfections end up looking like gaping caverns. :)

    I'm riding the fence between AU-58, and MS-63, and can't bring myself to resolve the obvious gap in my range. One of those cases where even good pictures probably won't take the place of having it in hand....(Or, I'm just inept....take your pick). :smiley:

    @TommyType said:
    These are tough because pictures inevitably blow the tiny coins up into dinner plate size, and any imperfections end up looking like gaping caverns. :)

    I'm riding the fence between AU-58, and MS-63, and can't bring myself to resolve the obvious gap in my range. One of those cases where even good pictures probably won't take the place of having it in hand....(Or, I'm just inept....take your pick). :smiley:

    I agree--my first thought was 58/62 range.

  • Options
    roadrunnerroadrunner Posts: 28,374 ✭✭✭✭✭

    62/63 coin these days. If it's in a 58 holder you did good.

    Barbarous Relic No More, LSCC -GoldSeek--shadow stats--SafeHaven--321gold
  • Options
    goldengolden Posts: 10,579 ✭✭✭✭✭

    58.

  • Options
    ColonelJessupColonelJessup Posts: 6,442 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 25, 2017 7:26AM

    I think, with either a AU58CAC green sticker or 62 CAC green to verify the color, the coin is worth 64 money. The spreads aren't that big. Exceptionally vivid album toning due to excellent remaining lustre.

    edited to add: The lustre and color in the second image are subdued compared to those of the first. :*

    "People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf." - Geo. Orwell
  • Options
    FlatwoodsFlatwoods Posts: 4,270 ✭✭✭✭✭

    My phone must be killing your trime.
    My first thought was 55 based on the reverse.
    It isn't a mint state coin in the strict sense.
    I am anxious to see what they awarded it.
    Don't take my post the wrong way. I like the coin fine.

  • Options
    DRUNNERDRUNNER Posts: 3,948 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I think the coin is superb.

    My reaction is AU58. I look at the microhits in the fields and devices as evidence of very brief circulation or handling, at least in the coins in my end of the pool. I fully realize there are VERY many certified MS coins that have those microhits, but it has just seemed to me to be my clearest way of looking at the MS / AU dilemma.

    Drunner

  • Options
    KoveKove Posts: 2,110 ✭✭✭✭

    AU 58. And a pretty one

  • Options
    CommemKingCommemKing Posts: 2,202 ✭✭✭✭✭

    58

  • Options
    rickoricko Posts: 98,721 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I thought 55.... could be the magnification.... Cheers, RickO

  • Options
    ms70ms70 Posts: 13,957 ✭✭✭✭✭

    58, though it looks like one of those 58/62 coins. Either way, I'd be happy to own it. It's a beauty!

  • Options
    291fifth291fifth Posts: 25,257 ✭✭✭✭✭

    55

    All glory is fleeting.
  • Options
    oih82w8oih82w8 Posts: 13,328 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Good job everybody!

    oih82w8 = Oh I Hate To Wait _defectus patientia_aka...Dr. Defecto - Curator of RMO's

    BST transactions: dbldie55, jayPem, 78saen, UltraHighRelief, nibanny, liefgold, FallGuy, lkeigwin, mbogoman, Sandman70gt, keets, joeykoins, ianrussell (@GC), EagleEye, ThePennyLady, GRANDAM, Ilikecolor, Gluggo, okiedude, Voyageur, LJenkins11, fastfreddie, ms70, pursuitofliberty, ZoidMeister,Coin Finder, GotTheBug, edwardjulio, Coinnmore, Nickpatton, Namvet69,...
  • Options
    BillJonesBillJones Posts: 36,020 ✭✭✭✭✭

    My grade would have been AU-55. Perhaps that's because you have tiny coin blow up to much larger proportions.

    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • Options
    Jackthecat1Jackthecat1 Posts: 1,122 ✭✭✭

    A beautiful little coin. Love the reverse toning.

    Member ANS, ANA, GSNA, TNC



    image

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file