Options
Does this Sac look funky to you?
TopographicOceans
Posts: 6,535 ✭✭✭✭
TopographicOceans
Posts: 6,535 ✭✭✭✭
Comments
smoke signals. Translation: "should not be a 70."
"Money does not care about speeches on morality. Capital asks whether the rules will remain the same tomorrow. With inflation, people assume price is the problem, and propose regulation—but price is simply the message." - Martin Armstrong
I've AT'd them to that blue with the dust from shredded bank wrapper paper -- not the shredded bits, but the dust. the area would have to be totally covered to AT it like that. it's possible, but static has made even coverage a bit of a pain.
Looks like haze that develops on some coins.
Wait, isn't it the reverse that looks funky?
Hmmm... Now I don't know.
I follow the rule that the obverse has the date, but looking at both pictures neither has a date.
So I have to assume the date is on the edge.
Maybe PCGS mounts these with the reverse in front, but normally that requires a special request.
Since each year has a different reverse, I think that's why they mount the reverse forward.
My bid of one dollar would be defeated. Not a fan of the Sac dollars
Moisture damage in the slab?
P.S. The other side (the one you're calling the reverse) has something going on with it and does not look normal to me. Look at the close-ups.
You're generous given the buyer's premium. The winning bidder is almost certain to be a plastic collector unless there is something I'm missing (variety, etc.).
I swear I've heard your thread title in a football locker room at least a dozen times
Looks like a regular Sacagawea to me....Not sure I would call it a 70....Cheers, RickO