Home› U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Do you believe in miracles? (crossover success for the ages)

Alltheabove76Alltheabove76 Posts: 1,539 ✭✭✭✭

This actually happened.


Comments

  • Options
    SoCalBigMarkSoCalBigMark Posts: 2,852 ✭✭✭✭✭

    If it happened for you, you suck.

  • Options
    REALGATORREALGATOR Posts: 2,705 ✭✭✭✭✭

    You got game!

  • Options
    Wabbit2313Wabbit2313 Posts: 7,268 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Sure does not look like the same coin to me? If it is, WOW!

  • Options
    BruceSBruceS Posts: 1,564 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Wabbit2313 said:
    Sure does not look like the same coin to me? If it is, WOW!

    That was my first thought also, the first photo is very dark and hard to tell. And Congrats on the upgrade.

    eBay ID-bruceshort978
    Successful BST:here and ATS, bumanchu, wdrob, hashtag, KeeNoooo, mikej61, Yonico, Meltdown, BAJJERFAN, Excaliber, lordmarcovan, cucamongacoin, robkool, bradyc, tonedcointrader, mumu, Windycity, astrotrain, tizofthe, overdate, rwyarmch, mkman123, Timbuk3,GBurger717, airplanenut, coinkid855 ,illini420, michaeldixon, Weiss, Morpheus, Deepcoin, Collectorcoins, AUandAG, D.Schwager, blu62vette, morgan13, torinoCobra71, JWP, promethius88,
  • Options
    AzurescensAzurescens Posts: 2,907 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Wow nice job.

  • Options
    Wabbit2313Wabbit2313 Posts: 7,268 ✭✭✭✭✭

    So it was not a crossover.

    Very nice on the grade!

  • Options
    BarndogBarndog Posts: 20,533 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Alltheabove76 said:
    I understand your skepticism! But, I cracked out of the holder myself. The first coin is the ebay sellers scanner image and the second is my camera. I would have taken much better pics of the ANACS slab if I had know this was going to happen!

    congrats, but technically not a crossover. I wonder what the grade would have been had you submitted it for crossover (in the ANACS holder). We will never know...

  • Options
    Alltheabove76Alltheabove76 Posts: 1,539 ✭✭✭✭

    @Barndog said:

    @Alltheabove76 said:
    I understand your skepticism! But, I cracked out of the holder myself. The first coin is the ebay sellers scanner image and the second is my camera. I would have taken much better pics of the ANACS slab if I had know this was going to happen!

    congrats, but technically not a crossover. I wonder what the grade would have been had you submitted it for crossover (in the ANACS holder). We will never know...

    True. Something tells me less than MS63!

  • Options
    BarndogBarndog Posts: 20,533 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I'd agree with you on that! Count me in as a skeptic of "judging the coin, not the holder"

  • Options
    Alltheabove76Alltheabove76 Posts: 1,539 ✭✭✭✭

    @Barndog said:
    I'd agree with you on that! Count me in as a skeptic of "judging the coin, not the holder"

    I thought AU58 and would have been very pleased with that.

  • Options
    BarndogBarndog Posts: 20,533 ✭✭✭✭✭

    sending to CAC? :D

  • Options
    bolivarshagnastybolivarshagnasty Posts: 7,359 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Crack out not a cross over, but a raw submission. Congrats on the keen eye and upgrade!

  • Options
    AmazonXAmazonX Posts: 681 ✭✭✭✭

    :o

  • Options
    AnkurJAnkurJ Posts: 11,375 ✭✭✭✭

    Awesome! Coingrats!

    All coins kept in bank vaults.
    PCGS Registries
    Box of 20
    SeaEagleCoins: 11/14/54-4/5/12. Miss you Larry!
  • Options
    Alltheabove76Alltheabove76 Posts: 1,539 ✭✭✭✭

    @Barndog said:
    sending to CAC? :D

    I don't think ill push my luck! :)

  • Options
    jwittenjwitten Posts: 5,430 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I've crossed a few $2 1/2 Indians from NGC TO Anacs (to get certain varieties on the holder than NGC would not recognize), and literally every one came back graded lower. ANACS has been strict lately.

  • Options
    TonerGuyTonerGuy Posts: 590 ✭✭✭

    So PCGS upgraded an ANACS AU53 coin 10 points ? For the lolz....

  • Options
    FallGuyFallGuy Posts: 207 ✭✭✭

    Outstanding! Two thumbs up!

  • Options
    BryceMBryceM Posts: 11,941 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Why is sending to CAC pushing your luck? Do you not agree with the PCGS grade?

  • Options
    Alltheabove76Alltheabove76 Posts: 1,539 ✭✭✭✭

    @BryceM said:
    Why is sending to CAC pushing your luck? Do you not agree with the PCGS grade?

    I think it has a rub. To me its an AU58. It was never an AU53 though, and I dont know what is going in Colorado but they cant afford to be undergrading coins. If they are going to do that there is absolutely no reason at all to send a coin there.

  • Options
    goldengolden Posts: 10,552 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Score.

  • Options
    abcde12345abcde12345 Posts: 3,404 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Don't allow anyone to mock the crack-n-cross many of use here support. The naysayers be danged.

  • Options
    BryceMBryceM Posts: 11,941 ✭✭✭✭✭

    To be clear (again), it is NOT a crossover if the coin was cracked out. Once a coin is out of a slab it is no different than any other raw coin.

    A crossover is a specific grading service offered by our host that has its own set of advantages and disadvantages. It is very different than submitting (or resubmitting) once-slabbed-now-raw coins in for grading.

  • Options
    MoldnutMoldnut Posts: 3,116 ✭✭✭✭

    @pcgs69 said:
    If it was a crossover they would have put it in an xf45 holder

    And everyone would have thought the ANACS grade was too high.

    Derek

    EAC 6024
  • Options
    cameonut2011cameonut2011 Posts: 11,042 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @TonerGuy said:
    So PCGS upgraded an ANACS AU53 coin 10 points ? For the lolz....

    Or one coincidental mechanical error. The coin looks AU to my eyes.

  • Options
    COINS MAKE CENTSCOINS MAKE CENTS Posts: 1,908 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Very nice!!!!!!

    New inventory added daily at Coins Make Cents
    HAPPY COLLECTING


  • Options
    abcde12345abcde12345 Posts: 3,404 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Moldnut said:

    @pcgs69 said:
    If it was a crossover they would have put it in an xf45 holder

    And everyone would have thought the ANACS grade was too high.

    Only to those who never looked at the actual coin.

  • Options
    mannie graymannie gray Posts: 7,259 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It's been my experience that the yellow ANACS holders are quite conservative on copper, especially on Lincolns.

  • Options
    rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Very nice... and quite a surprise..... I really cannot judge the coin in the ANACS slab... the picture just will not allow that.... Congratulations are in order... Cheers, RickO

  • Options
    mercurydimeguymercurydimeguy Posts: 4,634 ✭✭✭✭

    @Barndog said:
    congrats, but technically not a crossover. I wonder what the grade would have been had you submitted it for crossover (in the ANACS holder). We will never know...

    It would have come back as an AU53...with 99.99%

  • Options
    nk1nknk1nk Posts: 486 ✭✭✭✭

    @BryceM said:
    To be clear (again), it is NOT a crossover if the coin was cracked out. Once a coin is out of a slab it is no different than any other raw coin.

    A crossover is a specific grading service offered by our host that has its own set of advantages and disadvantages. It is very different than submitting (or resubmitting) once-slabbed-now-raw coins in for grading.

    Whether the coin is in an ANACS slab, in plastic baggie, in a flip, out of a flip it doesn't change the coin and PCGS is paid to grade coins not slabs. If it was one grade bump I would get what your saying due to the fact that PCGS is looking thru plastic to determine an upgrade but they sure as hell should be able to see a 10 point upgrade thru plastic and once they take the coin out of the ANACS holder to grade it, it's the same result as a raw submission in my eyes, if not that's a flaw on PCGS and their integrity imo

  • Options
    Alltheabove76Alltheabove76 Posts: 1,539 ✭✭✭✭

    I doubt if I live to be 100 ill ever buy another ANACS coin that PCGS upgrades by 10 points. I wish I had taken great pics of that coin in its slab, but like I said, I wasnt expecting this to happen. Oh well, on that same submission I also had a bad experience so in the end it all events out I suppose.

  • Options
    Wabbit2313Wabbit2313 Posts: 7,268 ✭✭✭✭✭

    One of them had a mechanical error. It is impossible to tell from either image above which one it was.

  • Options
    ashelandasheland Posts: 24,548 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Epic upgrade!

  • Options
    boyernumismaticsboyernumismatics Posts: 473 ✭✭✭✭

    @Wabbit2313 said:
    One of them had a mechanical error. It is impossible to tell from either image above which one it was.

    53 to 63... could have easily been a mechanical error.

  • Options
    WaterSportWaterSport Posts: 7,078 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Congrats to you! Special coin in deed. Glad it graded this way for you.

    Sorry guys, But I do not think its all mechanical. And Yes, a crossover versas a raw submission is different, but the point is, two companies graded a "raw coin" and it came back 10 points apart. For us old timers on the forum, we loathed in the days of sending ANACS (or any other TPG) in to PCGS for cross overs. There must have been a billion post about whether to crack out, or not crack out as everyone in those days was scared to even send a coin in for crossover. Well my, my, how things have changed! I can only speak for Lincoln cents but I have been having a field day when it comes to sending any Lincoln cent in for grading - especially previously graded ANACS coins. So what happened ? again if we go back in time- everyone said "PCGS grades to a higher standard". Well either ANACS has lowered theirs - or PCGS has raised theirs even further (not). No doubt its gradeflation (or the inability for ANACS to get it right the first time) but looking through a couple of years of submissions of ANACS crossover has given me nothing but a point or 2 higher grades plus those pictured below. Maybe its because I always crack out and hit them with Acetone before submitting. Maybe its luck, but I do know, its not mechanical. Of course these are not nearly as special as the OP's coin. But the issue is the same.

    WS


    Now in a PCGS 63 R&B holder


    Now in a PCGS 64 RED holder

    Proud recipient of the coveted PCGS Forum "You Suck" Award Thursday July 19, 2007 11:33 PM and December 30th, 2011 at 8:50 PM.
  • Options
    metalmeistermetalmeister Posts: 4,633 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Almost hard to believe but, I have many very nice coins sitting in ANACS holders. I bought the coin, not the holder.

    email: ccacollectibles@yahoo.com

    100% Positive BST transactions
  • Options
    TonerGuyTonerGuy Posts: 590 ✭✭✭

    Based on the two better photos by Watersports above Im going with PCGS is overgrading Lincolns - not that ANACS is undergrading Lincolns.

    Im not a Lincoln guy but all 3 look like they have rub. This should be a canary in the coal mine moment...

  • Options
    1630Boston1630Boston Posts: 14,157 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Congrats, and the results are something to think about, IMO :smile:

    Successful transactions with : MICHAELDIXON, Manorcourtman, Bochiman, bolivarshagnasty, AUandAG, onlyroosies, chumley, Weiss, jdimmick, BAJJERFAN, gene1978, TJM965, Smittys, GRANDAM, JTHawaii, mainejoe, softparade, derryb, Ricko

    Bad transactions with : nobody to date

  • Options
    brg5658brg5658 Posts: 2,408 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Congrats, you have the same coin in new plastic that proves the inconsistency of TPGs...and I'm not sure it really speaks too highly of the hosts...

    Was it conserved in between?

    -Brandon
    -~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-
    My sets: [290+ horse coins] :: [France Sowers] :: [Colorful world copper] :: [Beautiful world coins]
    -~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-
  • Options
    abcde12345abcde12345 Posts: 3,404 ✭✭✭✭✭

    pcgs was and is right. anacs got it wrong. Lower grades in other teir holders don't make them conservative, just wrong.

  • Options

    great job........the coin spoke for itself and good score for you!!!!

    Fountain of Useless Information
  • Options
    logger7logger7 Posts: 9,927 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It is impressive that PCGS is willing to be so objective and not keep it back.

  • Options
    oih82w8oih82w8 Posts: 13,242 ✭✭✭✭✭

    No TrueView?

    oih82w8 = Oh I Hate To Wait _defectus patientia_aka...Dr. Defecto - Curator of RMO's

    BST transactions: dbldie55, jayPem, 78saen, UltraHighRelief, nibanny, liefgold, FallGuy, lkeigwin, mbogoman, Sandman70gt, keets, joeykoins, ianrussell (@GC), EagleEye, ThePennyLady, GRANDAM, Ilikecolor, Gluggo, okiedude, Voyageur, LJenkins11, fastfreddie, ms70, pursuitofliberty, ZoidMeister,Coin Finder, GotTheBug, edwardjulio, Coinnmore, Nickpatton, Namvet69,...
  • Options
    CakesCakes Posts: 3,748 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @logger7 said:
    It is impressive that PCGS is willing to be so objective and not keep it back.

    I'm sorry but I don't understand.

    Successful coin BST transactions with Gerard and segoja.

    Successful card BST transactions with cbcnow, brogurt, gstarling, Bravesfan 007, and rajah 424.
  • Options
    CakesCakes Posts: 3,748 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @abcde12345 said:
    Don't allow anyone to mock the crack-n-cross many of use here support. The naysayers be danged.

    I don't think anyone mocked the crack and cross technique. IMHO most of us consider it the best way to get the highest possible grade. They just pointed out it wasn't a crossover like the thread title stated.

    Successful coin BST transactions with Gerard and segoja.

    Successful card BST transactions with cbcnow, brogurt, gstarling, Bravesfan 007, and rajah 424.
  • Options
    logger7logger7 Posts: 9,927 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Cakes said:

    @logger7 said:
    It is impressive that PCGS is willing to be so objective and not keep it back.

    I'm sorry but I don't understand.

    Probably Anacs saw some friction and little eye appeal whereas maybe PCGS saw a technical 63 coin though somewhat doggy. Later buyers will look at the coin and assess at what price they are willing to buy it. Gone are the days when you could call up leading wholesalers and get firm prices bases on grades for coins like this.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file