Home U.S. Coin Forum

Who were the original collectors of US coinage in the 1790s?

291fifth291fifth Posts: 24,809 ✭✭✭✭✭

Were many of them actually in Europe? Who was actively collecting in the US itself?

All glory is fleeting.

Comments

  • crazyhounddogcrazyhounddog Posts: 14,089 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The guy that held onto that 1794 flowing hair that sold for ten million.

    The bitterness of "Poor Quality" is remembered long after the sweetness of low price is forgotten.
  • Coin FinderCoin Finder Posts: 7,507 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The new federal government! Same today!

  • TopographicOceansTopographicOceans Posts: 6,535 ✭✭✭✭

    Who were the original collectors of US coinage in the 1790s?
    Rich people

  • NysotoNysoto Posts: 3,826 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The first year of issue for all US Mint denominations have a higher survival rate than following years, I would expect many were saved by those wanting an example of the first year issue of these new coins that were emblematic of Liberty. Also, David Rittenhouse and a few others had coins from the first issue. I don't believe that many were from Europe. When rare 1790's US coins started having numismatic value premiums after around 1850, the heavily circulated examples were saved.

    Robert Scot: Engraving Liberty - biography of US Mint's first chief engraver
  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 35,005 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @291fifth said:
    Were many of them actually in Europe? Who was actively collecting in the US itself?

    I'd say a few U.S. Mint officials who set aside some coins. I've heard that some early pieces were once owned by David Rittenhouse, the first mint director.

    As for "average Joe" collectors in the U.S. in the 1790s, there weren't any.

    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • SonorandesertratSonorandesertrat Posts: 5,695 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited February 5, 2017 1:27PM

    At that time, the few collectors of Americana were evidently mostly interested in colonial issues; ancient coins and medals were probably more popular among the known collectors. Not much is known with certainty about many of them. Du Simitiere and Eliot were dead by 1790. Thomas Jefferson had a collection, as did John Quincy Adams (but both undoubtedly contained counterfeits). By 1790, possibly the best known person who had a collection that included colonial and early federal coins was Charles Wilson Peale. He is the Peale of Peale's Museum (which issued a token that is highly sought after).

    Member: EAC, NBS, C4, CWTS, ANA

    RMR: 'Wer, wenn ich schriee, hörte mich denn aus der Engel Ordnungen?'

    CJ: 'No one!' [Ain't no angels in the coin biz]
  • This content has been removed.
  • 291fifth291fifth Posts: 24,809 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @afford said:
    To go along with Nysoto and expand a bit, I have to believe anyone working for and with the newly formed gov't a la founding fathers and mint officials owned a number of first coins and each successive year. How could they not own them. Rittenhouse family had 4 1792 Half Disme's, four in high high grade wonderfully preserved and held in the family until the early 1900's. Most of the founding fathers were wealthy and that would be another reason for them to have a collection albeit small. Exuberance and involvement to the newly formed gov't , fighting in the revolutionary war and the war of 1812 all led to the feelings of patriotism which would give the motivation to own select pieces if not all. How could Ben Franklin and his likes not own etc etc. I think across the board they all owned them and kept them until their deaths and then disbursed whereas those working for the mint and familiar with the business of coins and the dealers coming by the mint may provide instructions to their families to keep the coins for enhanced future value.

    Ben Franklin died in 1790.

    All glory is fleeting.
  • ZoinsZoins Posts: 34,401 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited February 5, 2017 3:05PM

    Farmers. Washington and Jefferson were farmers, and so was William Strickland, a distant relative of Washington, that picked up the Lord St. Oswald coins while visiting from England to research agricultural techniques.

    Wikipedia page for William Strickland (farmer).

  • KellenCoinKellenCoin Posts: 1,243 ✭✭✭✭

    As far as I know, there were not that many collectors of these coins until the 1850s

    Fan of the Oxford Comma
    CCAC Representative of the General Public
    2021 Young Numismatist of the Year

  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 35,005 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Brady proved me wrong!

    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Certainly some of the more well to do would have had small collections... but fortunes were fleeting at that time, and likely some collections became sustenance.... no doubt though, with some of the surviving coins we see, there were those that preserved a few for our present day viewing pleasure. Cheers, RickO

  • CoinosaurusCoinosaurus Posts: 9,645 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I suspect if you could transport yourself back to the 1790s, most people would think you were an idiot for building a substantial collection of U.S. coins. A few pieces were saved as curiosities, but clearly no one cared much about it, otherwise we'd have a lot more high grade survivors than we do today.

  • This content has been removed.
  • 1630Boston1630Boston Posts: 14,115 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Perhaps what we think was 'collecting' was the wealthy just storing their wealth by 'saving' the coins of the time :smile:
    JMO

    Successful transactions with : MICHAELDIXON, Manorcourtman, Bochiman, bolivarshagnasty, AUandAG, onlyroosies, chumley, Weiss, jdimmick, BAJJERFAN, gene1978, TJM965, Smittys, GRANDAM, JTHawaii, mainejoe, softparade, derryb, Ricko

    Bad transactions with : nobody to date

  • sellitstoresellitstore Posts: 3,053 ✭✭✭✭✭

    U.S. coins, especially gold and silver, were scarce to non-existent in circulation for many decades, especially in rural areas. Foreign issues were more prevalent in many places through the 1850s. Keeping U.S. coins from being exported and melted was perhaps the biggest problem that the mint faced in the early days, so obtaining examples to collect wasn't all that easy for everyone.

    Collector and dealer in obsolete currency. Always buying all obsolete bank notes and scrip.
  • logger7logger7 Posts: 9,203 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Probably mainly Europeans, where the real money was. Neat tokens of a young country. Yale was named after a commercial baron donated the fundes, of the same name, at the urging of Cotton Mather.

  • 1630Boston1630Boston Posts: 14,115 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Interesting idea logger7 :smile:

    Successful transactions with : MICHAELDIXON, Manorcourtman, Bochiman, bolivarshagnasty, AUandAG, onlyroosies, chumley, Weiss, jdimmick, BAJJERFAN, gene1978, TJM965, Smittys, GRANDAM, JTHawaii, mainejoe, softparade, derryb, Ricko

    Bad transactions with : nobody to date

  • leothelyonleothelyon Posts: 8,495 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Merchants, men and women with trades, banks.....I imagine they saw more coins than most. Why wouldn't they have save something that might of appealed to them......if they could afford to do so?

    The more qualities observed in a coin, the more desirable that coin becomes!

    My Jefferson Nickel Collection

  • oldgoldloveroldgoldlover Posts: 429 ✭✭✭

    I doubt many people could afford to retain money once in hand back then. Food and firearms were the bigger concerns. A dollar in 1799 brought what $200 buys today.

  • 1630Boston1630Boston Posts: 14,115 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Trust me when I say that reasonable people **could **afford to save money back in the day, just my opinion based on family history. :smile:

    Successful transactions with : MICHAELDIXON, Manorcourtman, Bochiman, bolivarshagnasty, AUandAG, onlyroosies, chumley, Weiss, jdimmick, BAJJERFAN, gene1978, TJM965, Smittys, GRANDAM, JTHawaii, mainejoe, softparade, derryb, Ricko

    Bad transactions with : nobody to date

  • BryceMBryceM Posts: 11,885 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I think our modern perception of life in the 1700s in America is often not quite accurate. I'm no expert, but I've seen it quoted in several biographies and histories that the standard of living here was vastly higher than in Europe. The land was resource-rich and it was being developed freely by industrious men and women. There were plenty of poor people sure, but also plenty of nouveau-riche and a huge middle class. It's also quite possible that the distribution of wealth was far broader than today.

    Our current concepts are somewhat overly influenced (I think) by our parents & grandparents recollections of the Great Depression & the world wars.

  • 291fifth291fifth Posts: 24,809 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @BryceM said:
    I think our modern perception of life in the 1700s in America is often not quite accurate. I'm no expert, but I've seen it quoted in several biographies and histories that the standard of living here was vastly higher than in Europe. The land was resource-rich and it was being developed freely by industrious men and women. There were plenty of poor people sure, but also plenty of nouveau-riche and a huge middle class. It's also quite possible that the distribution of wealth was far broader than today.

    Our current concepts are somewhat overly influenced (I think) by our parents & grandparents recollections of the Great Depression & the world wars.

    This is an excellent observation. People came here because the conditions in Europe were terrible. Land was not available for people of modest means and the people with money made sure they kept it ... no trickle down allowed. While it took place in the 1845-52 period, the Irish Potato Famine was a good example. Potatoes were the food for the common people in Ireland. When the crops failed they had nothing to eat in spite of the fact that wheat crops in Ireland would have been adequate to feed the population. Wheat, however, was a cash crop for export and export it they did. (My great grandfather along with his mother, brothers and sisters arrived in the US from Ireland in 1850. His father (my great great grandfather) had died in Ireland in 1848, circumstances unknown, at age 27 or 28.)

    All glory is fleeting.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file