Strike-through or PMD?

Comments

• Options

  Insider2 Posts: 14,452 ✭✭✭✭✭

  September 2, 2016 8:03AM

  You have the coin. Hold it under florescent light and look to see if the mark is into the coin or on the surface. My guess is some debris got on the coin and was missed during QC.

  0
• Options

  CascadeChris Posts: 2,529 ✭✭✭✭✭

  September 2, 2016 8:37AM

  Looks like a minor debris strikethrough. Not the value added kind though. These are seen more as damage

  The more you VAM..

  0
• Options

  ricko Posts: 98,721 ✭✭✭✭✭

  September 3, 2016 12:29AM

  Judging from the pictures, I would say strike through....Cheers, RickO

  0
• Options

  silverpop Posts: 6,869 ✭✭✭✭✭

  September 3, 2016 1:01AM

  Strike-through

  0
• Options

  Weiss Posts: 9,942 ✭✭✭✭✭

  September 3, 2016 1:40AM

  Thanks everyone. The edges seemed so crisp and abrupt that it just didn't seem to be a contact mark from another coin. And the fact that NGC graded it 69 led me to believe they'd seen it too and thought the same.
  
  
  
  So on a piece that's already an error (mule), do you think it has the potential to increase $$ & demand, decrease it, or neutral?
  
  
  
  
  
  Edit to add I may just eBay it to see what the market thinks.

  We are like children who look at print and see a serpent in the last letter but one, and a sword in the last.
  --Severian the Lame
  

  0
• Options

  lkeigwin Posts: 16,895 ✭✭✭✭✭

  September 3, 2016 1:46AM

  Certainly not an increase. I don't like it more because of it.
  
  
  
  Probably neutral.
  
  Lance.

  Coin Photography Services / Everyman Registry set / BHNC #213

  0
• Options

  johnny9434 Posts: 34,844 ✭✭✭✭✭

  September 3, 2016 1:56AM

  looks like a strike thru to me as well

  0