Two 18-S buffs in AU, which do you like better?

Perhaps not a fair comparison with Truview vs. a seller image, but I will try. Which coin do you like better and why.
As background the 18-S is one of the strike challenged issues in the series. Central details are often particularly awful, with hair braid details non-existent and the buffalos back flat as a pancake. Severe die erosion is also a frequent problem. AU grades are scarce, with 10 58s showing in auction archives since the one I bought in 2007. 55s are slightly easier, with about a dozen coming to auction this decade. Prices rocket in the MS grades and you can easily spent $2K on a 63 and $4K on a 64.
The Truview is PCGS 58. Very natural surfaces although not as dark as the Truview depicts. A truly superior die state and strike for the issue. I had the 'honor' of paying the highest auction realized for an 18-S in 58 from 2007 until January 2014. This has been a prize of my collection for many years and never thought I would consider letting it go.

The one with the seller images is PCGS 55 CAC. The strike is comparable to the 58, although perhaps a tad less good. There may be marginally more wear on the high points, but reasonable folks could debate. Luster is a bit better from what I remember (58 is in SDB at moment). This one is also a partial two feather, although I do not think it would attribute since the 18-S 2Fs are true 2Fs with nothing left, as far as I have seen. I would also welcome thoughts on this last point.


Thanks for looking!
As background the 18-S is one of the strike challenged issues in the series. Central details are often particularly awful, with hair braid details non-existent and the buffalos back flat as a pancake. Severe die erosion is also a frequent problem. AU grades are scarce, with 10 58s showing in auction archives since the one I bought in 2007. 55s are slightly easier, with about a dozen coming to auction this decade. Prices rocket in the MS grades and you can easily spent $2K on a 63 and $4K on a 64.
The Truview is PCGS 58. Very natural surfaces although not as dark as the Truview depicts. A truly superior die state and strike for the issue. I had the 'honor' of paying the highest auction realized for an 18-S in 58 from 2007 until January 2014. This has been a prize of my collection for many years and never thought I would consider letting it go.

The one with the seller images is PCGS 55 CAC. The strike is comparable to the 58, although perhaps a tad less good. There may be marginally more wear on the high points, but reasonable folks could debate. Luster is a bit better from what I remember (58 is in SDB at moment). This one is also a partial two feather, although I do not think it would attribute since the 18-S 2Fs are true 2Fs with nothing left, as far as I have seen. I would also welcome thoughts on this last point.


Thanks for looking!
0
Comments
That said, I'd be thrilled to own any 18S in true AU....even XF's are tough to find.
jim
When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln
Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.....Mark Twain
rainbowroosie April 1, 2003
BST transactions: dbldie55, jayPem, 78saen, UltraHighRelief, nibanny, liefgold, FallGuy, lkeigwin, mbogoman, Sandman70gt, keets, joeykoins, ianrussell (@GC), EagleEye, ThePennyLady, GRANDAM, Ilikecolor, Gluggo, okiedude, Voyageur, LJenkins11, fastfreddie, ms70, pursuitofliberty, ZoidMeister,Coin Finder, GotTheBug, edwardjulio, Coinnmore, Nickpatton, Namvet69,...
58 due to the strike.
Not only does it have better details from the strike, the color gives it better eye appeal as well.