GTG, just sent to PCGS, GRADE JUST POSTED
AUandAG
Posts: 24,939 ✭✭✭✭✭
1880CC, PO01, CERT: 81190760
Lesson learned, look closely at the mint mark!!
bob
1889cc, hoping for a PO01 of course.
edited to be fair.
Here's a FR02 for reference:
Lesson learned, look closely at the mint mark!!
bob
1889cc, hoping for a PO01 of course.
edited to be fair.
Here's a FR02 for reference:
Registry: CC lowballs (boblindstrom), bobinvegas1989@yahoo.com
0
Comments
and yes, I really sent it for grading.
bob
HH
1947-P & D; 1948-D; 1949-P & S; 1950-D & S; and 1952-S.
Any help locating any of these OBW rolls would be gratefully appreciated!
good question but I think I see an inward curve on the left side indicating a 9. But, PCGS may disagree, we'll see.
bob
edit- and to answer OP I say 50/50 and leaning toward PO-1
Wish they'd give out Basal State for those coins so worn that they can only be dated using diagnostics for that year instead of the actual year... I just think it'd be neat to have an 1878 8TF BS-0!
edit- and to answer OP I say 50/50 and leaning toward PO-1
Yes, there are several dollars that no date is needed, nor mintmark. The 1890cc tailbar would be one of those as would the 1921 Peace dollar, just to name two.
bob
BST Transactions (as the seller): Collectall, GRANDAM, epcjimi1, wondercoin, jmski52, wheathoarder, jay1187, jdsueu, grote15, airplanenut, bigole
"If I say something in the woods and my wife isn't there to hear it.....am I still wrong?"
My Washington Quarter Registry set...in progress
Great transactions with oih82w8, JasonGaming, Moose1913.
"Everything is on its way to somewhere. Everything." - George Malley, Phenomenon
http://www.american-legacy-coins.com
Appears to be the reverse of '89-CC VAM 5. Note the dramatically lower position of the right C of mintmark.
The F02 graded coin, no?
Appears to be the reverse of '89-CC VAM 5. Note the dramatically lower position of the right C of mintmark.
The F02 graded coin, no?
Ah, fatigue is a strange thing. I was attributing the certified FR2.
Edited to add: The mintmark on Bob's coin is too small to be from an '89-CC reverse. I think it is 1880-CC, of which a half dozen or so reverse of 1879 (SAF) dies used the small cc mintmark. None of the 1889-CC reverse dies used the small cc.
"Everything is on its way to somewhere. Everything." - George Malley, Phenomenon
http://www.american-legacy-coins.com
I am very confused why would you send in such a worn coin? Is it really worth the price of grading for such a specimen?
Price guide is $700 for a 1.
"If I say something in the woods and my wife isn't there to hear it.....am I still wrong?"
My Washington Quarter Registry set...in progress
Appears to be the reverse of '89-CC VAM 5. Note the dramatically lower position of the right C of mintmark.
The F02 graded coin, no?
Ah, fatigue is a strange thing. I was attributing the certified FR2.
Edited to add: The mintmark on Bob's coin is too small to be from an '89-CC reverse. I think it is 1880-CC, of which a half dozen or so reverse of 1879 (SAF) dies used the small cc mintmark. None of the 1889-CC reverse dies used the small cc.
crap.....no no.....a PO 01, 1880-cc???? Heaven forbid...we'll see in about 3 weeks.
Really, I never even looked at the size of the CC's, lol.
bob
Pop report for 1880cc = 2
1889cc = 3
BST transactions: dbldie55, jayPem, 78saen, UltraHighRelief, nibanny, liefgold, FallGuy, lkeigwin, mbogoman, Sandman70gt, keets, joeykoins, ianrussell (@GC), EagleEye, ThePennyLady, GRANDAM, Ilikecolor, Gluggo, okiedude, Voyageur, LJenkins11, fastfreddie, ms70, pursuitofliberty, ZoidMeister,Coin Finder, GotTheBug, edwardjulio, Coinnmore, Nickpatton, Namvet69,...
The PO1 candidate has this reversed. I think having most of the obverse motto visible could be the decider.
bob
Please visit my website Millcitynumismatics.com
Check out my iPhone app SlabReader!
My YouTube Channel
I like it!
My YouTube Channel
I'd grade it Genuine, artificially worn.
OINK
- Jim
bob
bob