Quote from a Dealer
The New York Times today reported that a dealer said "It shows that it's not as bad as people think. If you're selective about what you put in your [auction] and its fresh material, it will do ok." Talking about coins? No, article about the Christie's art sale that brought more money than expected. Seems like there is a trend no matter what the collectible is---selective, quality and fresh does well.
0
Comments
What a penetrating glimpse into the obvious.
See http://www.doubledimes.com for a free online reference for US twenty-cent pieces
What a penetrating glimpse into the obvious.
Read this forum... most people here miss the obvious.
Latin American Collection
Coin Rarities Online
``https://ebay.us/m/KxolR5
What a penetrating glimpse into the obvious.
Read this forum... most people here miss the obvious.
Exactly my point. It does seem obvious but whether its art or coins or whatever, I can't remind myself enough to make sure that my purchase is material that meets these guidelines. I have to catch myself from buying something that seems to maybe fit a hole or seems really cheap---to remind myself that quality that only appears infrequently trumps a retread of a questionable coin regardless of how cheap it appears to be.
Quality, rarity, freshness, ... sounds like good lobster out of season. It's always expensive for a guy on a diet of tuna.
Fresh Tuna is way better than fresh lobster any day of the week.
Live lobster is easy to catch in season.
Live Tuna are elusive.
Assuming it's bought at the right time in the collectible's cycle. That methodology would not have worked very well in 1979-1980, 1989-1990, 2007-2008. If you're holding for 20-30 years or more, then you can probably work off most of the cycle volatility. A significant % of fresh, quality, and select coins from 1989 are no higher today, and in most cases probably lower. The Farouk 1933 $20 Saint when purchased for $7+ MILL in 2002 met all those requirements. How's that worked out?
For seller it worked out great!