Home U.S. Coin Forum

Quote from a Dealer

GazesGazes Posts: 2,315 ✭✭✭✭✭
The New York Times today reported that a dealer said "It shows that it's not as bad as people think. If you're selective about what you put in your [auction] and its fresh material, it will do ok." Talking about coins? No, article about the Christie's art sale that brought more money than expected. Seems like there is a trend no matter what the collectible is---selective, quality and fresh does well.

Comments

  • astroratastrorat Posts: 9,221 ✭✭✭✭✭
    If you're selective about what you put in your [auction] and its fresh material, it will do ok.


    What a penetrating glimpse into the obvious.
    Numismatist Ordinaire
    See http://www.doubledimes.com for a free online reference for US twenty-cent pieces
  • BoosibriBoosibri Posts: 12,497 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: astrorat

    If you're selective about what you put in your [auction] and its fresh material, it will do ok.




    What a penetrating glimpse into the obvious.





    Read this forum... most people here miss the obvious.
  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The old saying.... Good is not cheap and cheap is not good. Cheers, RickO
  • CoinRaritiesOnlineCoinRaritiesOnline Posts: 3,682 ✭✭✭✭
    I believe the operative word in the quote is "fresh", as nothing seems to motivate collector and dealer buyers more than a fresh collection and, in my experience, freshness seems to trump quality in a lot of these sales.
  • TwoSides2aCoinTwoSides2aCoin Posts: 44,708 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Quality, rarity, freshness, ... sounds like good lobster out of season. It's always expensive for a guy on a diet of tuna.
  • GazesGazes Posts: 2,315 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: Boosibri

    Originally posted by: astrorat

    If you're selective about what you put in your [auction] and its fresh material, it will do ok.




    What a penetrating glimpse into the obvious.





    Read this forum... most people here miss the obvious.




    Exactly my point. It does seem obvious but whether its art or coins or whatever, I can't remind myself enough to make sure that my purchase is material that meets these guidelines. I have to catch myself from buying something that seems to maybe fit a hole or seems really cheap---to remind myself that quality that only appears infrequently trumps a retread of a questionable coin regardless of how cheap it appears to be.



  • ctf_error_coinsctf_error_coins Posts: 15,433 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: TwoSides2aCoin
    Quality, rarity, freshness, ... sounds like good lobster out of season. It's always expensive for a guy on a diet of tuna.


    Fresh Tuna is way better than fresh lobster any day of the week.

    Live lobster is easy to catch in season.

    Live Tuna are elusive.



  • roadrunnerroadrunner Posts: 28,324 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: Gazes... Seems like there is a trend no matter what the collectible is---selective, quality and fresh does well.




    Assuming it's bought at the right time in the collectible's cycle. That methodology would not have worked very well in 1979-1980, 1989-1990, 2007-2008. If you're holding for 20-30 years or more, then you can probably work off most of the cycle volatility. A significant % of fresh, quality, and select coins from 1989 are no higher today, and in most cases probably lower. The Farouk 1933 $20 Saint when purchased for $7+ MILL in 2002 met all those requirements. How's that worked out?



    Barbarous Relic No More, LSCC -GoldSeek--shadow stats--SafeHaven--321gold
  • DavideoDavideo Posts: 1,363 ✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: roadrunner The Farouk 1933 $20 Saint when purchased for $7+ MILL in 2002 met all those requirements. How's that worked out?


    For seller it worked out great! image

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file