Home› U.S. Coin Forum
Options

GTG: 1898-S Morgan Dollar

BustHalfBrianBustHalfBrian Posts: 4,191 ✭✭✭✭
in U.S. Coin Forum
I'm split on this one. What do the masses think?

imageimage
Lurking and learning since 2010. Full-time professional numismatist based in SoCal.

Comments

  • Bob1951Bob1951 Posts: 268 ✭✭
    Not uncirculated. This issue comes well struck. Not a bad coin if want an AU. 55
  • coinkatcoinkat Posts: 23,803 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I would like to see the coin in hand just to see if the image captures the real look of the coin

    Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.

  • gripgrip Posts: 9,962 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Looks like a slider.
  • cmerlo1cmerlo1 Posts: 7,952 ✭✭✭✭✭
    58
    You Suck! Awarded 6/2008- 1901-O Micro O Morgan, 8/2008- 1878 VAM-123 Morgan, 9/2022 1888-O VAM-1B3 H8 Morgan | Senior Regional Representative- ANACS Coin Grading. Posted opinions on coins are my own, and are not an official ANACS opinion.
  • BryceMBryceM Posts: 11,851 ✭✭✭✭✭
    From those photos I can't tell. Looks devoid of life & luster. The grey regions in the fields and high point irregularity make me think mid-range AU. Overdipped?
  • roadrunnerroadrunner Posts: 28,313 ✭✭✭✭✭
    60/61 on a good day.....58 on all the others. Can't say I see anything that is blatant wear. And while the luster is not bold, it's covering what it needs to.
    Barbarous Relic No More, LSCC -GoldSeek--shadow stats--SafeHaven--321gold
  • ashelandasheland Posts: 23,696 ✭✭✭✭✭
    AU58

    My YouTube Channel

  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
  • ElKevvoElKevvo Posts: 4,134 ✭✭✭✭✭
    If it comes back MS I think it will be a 63. That being said it could be somewhat of a slider...tough to tell if the hair over the ears is the result of a weak strike or minor wear. Some marks on the face and chatter in the obverse fields., maybe AU58 if not MS. I know it sounds like I am hedging my bets but tough to tell the luster etc. from the photos. Thanks for posting!



    K
    ANA LM
  • jughead1893jughead1893 Posts: 1,713 ✭✭✭✭✭
    61
  • goldengolden Posts: 9,981 ✭✭✭✭✭
    55 here.
  • KyleKyle Posts: 1,822 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Looks like a 55.
    Successful BST Transactions With: tonedase, streg2, airplanenut, coindeuce, vibr0nic, natetrook, Shrub68, golden, Lakesammman, drddm, Ilikecolor, CoinJunkie, wondercoin, lablover
  • halfhunterhalfhunter Posts: 2,770 ✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: Kyle

    Looks like a 55.




    image



    HH

    Need the following OBW rolls to complete my 46-64 Roosevelt roll set:
    1947-P & D; 1948-D; 1949-P & S; 1950-D & S; and 1952-S.
    Any help locating any of these OBW rolls would be gratefully appreciated!
  • AhrensdadAhrensdad Posts: 2,583 ✭✭✭
    I voted AU58.
    Successful BST Transactions with: WTCG, Ikenefic, Twincam, InternetJunky, bestday, 1twobits, Geoman x4, Blackhawk, Robb, nederveit, mesquite, sinin1, CommemDude, Gerard, sebrown, Guitarwes, Commoncents05, tychojoe, adriana, SeaEagleCoins, ndgoflo, stone, vikingdude, golfer72, kameo, Scotty1418, Tdec1000, Sportsmoderator1 and many others.


    Please visit my website Millcitynumismatics.com
  • TopographicOceansTopographicOceans Posts: 6,535 ✭✭✭✭
    It's well struck, but the grey tone in the picture seems off to me.
    It looks flat and without any luster.

    I voted 58
  • DollarAfterDollarDollarAfterDollar Posts: 3,215 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Coin looks like a legitimate AU 58 to me. This is exactly the kind of coin they like to "market grade" so if submitted, anything goes.
    If you do what you always did, you get what you always got.
  • dizzleccdizzlecc Posts: 1,123 ✭✭✭
    It could go either way, low ms or high au. The large photo tend to be more critical of marks. The reverse looks clean but the toning lends toward the high au look.
  • mannie graymannie gray Posts: 7,259 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Looks 58 to me.
  • BustHalfBrianBustHalfBrian Posts: 4,191 ✭✭✭✭
    Thanks for the opinions, all. Maybe I should have mentioned the coin is not yet certified, and I probably won't bother with it now. My gut said 58 but I thought it might stretch to UNC.
    Lurking and learning since 2010. Full-time professional numismatist based in SoCal.
  • COINS MAKE CENTSCOINS MAKE CENTS Posts: 1,861 ✭✭✭✭✭
    55
    New inventory added daily at Coins Make Cents
    HAPPY COLLECTING


  • cameonut2011cameonut2011 Posts: 10,181 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I would graded it AU55 provided it has sufficient luster in hand. If not, I can see it grading lower as a "net" grade.
  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I would say MS60.....Cheers, RickO
  • DollarAfterDollarDollarAfterDollar Posts: 3,215 ✭✭✭✭✭
    No Brian,

    The luster break on the eagles breast is the biggest give away. The flatness behind the ear on an "S" mint coin is also.
    If you do what you always did, you get what you always got.
  • LeeBoneLeeBone Posts: 4,567 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I said 55

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Format
SpoilerCodeQuote
Heading 2Heading 1
Emoji
:):D:(;):/:o:s:p:'(:|B):#:*<3o:)>:)
Url
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file
Home • U.S. Coin ForumComment As ...