<< <i>looks like bothe figures are chewing a piece of straw! >>
Yeah, don't look like cigarettes.
Numismatist. 54 year member ANA. Former ANA Senior Authenticator. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and ANA Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Author of "The Enigmatic Lincoln Cents of 1922," Available now from Whitman or Amazon.
A lot of OGH coins were net graded- it's one of the reasons I don't agree with people just blindly buying OGHs because they assume they are always under graded. Looks like a mid range AU without those scratches to these tired eyes. Nowadays, this coin would not straight grade.
<< <i>The placement of both major marks makes me think that they were deliberately made (graffiti). This should not have straight graded. >>
Definitely deliberate.
Numismatist. 54 year member ANA. Former ANA Senior Authenticator. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and ANA Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Author of "The Enigmatic Lincoln Cents of 1922," Available now from Whitman or Amazon.
------------------------------------------------------ The May/June2012 description:
1813 $5 XF40 PCGS. BD-1, R.2. The Capped Head Left ranks among the rarest gold designs. The 1813 is the most available date within the series, and is often selected by early type collectors. The present apricot-gold representative appears to grade AU upon first glance, due to its sharpness and luster extent. However, thin marks are noted near the lips, beak, and wingtips. Housed in a first generation holder. -- Sold for $5,606 (including BP)
And the modified (more honest) August 2012 description:
1813 $5 XF40 PCGS. BD-1, R.2. One of the most difficult series to collect by date, the Capped Head Left design is collectible as a type chiefly due to the 1813. The present example appears to have the sharpness of a slightly higher grade but has four pinscratches located near the mouth, beak, and wingtips. Certified in a first generation holder. -- Sold for $5,875 (including BP)
-Brandon -~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~- My sets: [280+ horse coins] :: [France Sowers] :: [Colorful world copper] :: [Beautiful world coins] -~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-
I agree. Because of those deliberate marks, I would reject that coin out of hand.
Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
I'm posting this because of an 1842-O Eagle I have for sale on the BST. Interesting contrast in grading opinions. >>
There are actually 4 distracting marks. There are also two from each of the wing-tips to the rim of the coin on the reverse (in addition to the "mouth" lines from the bust and the eagle).
-Brandon -~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~- My sets: [280+ horse coins] :: [France Sowers] :: [Colorful world copper] :: [Beautiful world coins] -~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-
Test marks from when the coin was new and the design unfamiliar, someone scratched it a few places to veryify it was solid gold rather than gold plated before accepting.
Looks net graded, however the inconsistency is noted, similar coins are often "bagged" or "genuine-ed".
IMO all coins should be net graded with a number, no matter how low. ALL coins.
Comments
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
<< <i>looks like bothe figures are chewing a piece of straw! >>
Yeah, don't look like cigarettes.
RMR: 'Wer, wenn ich schriee, hörte mich denn aus der Engel Ordnungen?'
CJ: 'No one!' [Ain't no angels in the coin biz]
<< <i>The placement of both major marks makes me think that they were deliberately made (graffiti). This should not have straight graded. >>
Definitely deliberate.
------------------------------------------------------
The May/June2012 description:
1813 $5 XF40 PCGS. BD-1, R.2. The Capped Head Left ranks among the rarest gold designs. The 1813 is the most available date within the series, and is often selected by early type collectors. The present apricot-gold representative appears to grade AU upon first glance, due to its sharpness and luster extent. However, thin marks are noted near the lips, beak, and wingtips. Housed in a first generation holder. -- Sold for $5,606 (including BP)
And the modified (more honest) August 2012 description:
1813 $5 XF40 PCGS. BD-1, R.2. One of the most difficult series to collect by date, the Capped Head Left design is collectible as a type chiefly due to the 1813. The present example appears to have the sharpness of a slightly higher grade but has four pinscratches located near the mouth, beak, and wingtips. Certified in a first generation holder. -- Sold for $5,875 (including BP)
-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-
My sets: [280+ horse coins] :: [France Sowers] :: [Colorful world copper] :: [Beautiful world coins]
-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-
<< <i>Buy the holder not the coin:
2 very distracting scratches and it gets a grade! You might as well net grade all graffiti.
1813 $5
I'm posting this because of an 1842-O Eagle I have for sale on the BST. Interesting contrast in grading opinions. >>
There are actually 4 distracting marks. There are also two from each of the wing-tips to the rim of the coin on the reverse (in addition to the "mouth" lines from the bust and the eagle).
-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-
My sets: [280+ horse coins] :: [France Sowers] :: [Colorful world copper] :: [Beautiful world coins]
-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-
Looks net graded, however the inconsistency is noted, similar coins are often "bagged" or "genuine-ed".
IMO all coins should be net graded with a number, no matter how low. ALL coins.
Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry
....and I'm in agreement, that coin should not have straight graded.