Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Which Buffalo would you crack out for a set?

OnWithTheHuntOnWithTheHunt Posts: 1,312 ✭✭✭✭✭
Both have been in small white ANACS holders since I've owned them. The top one is graded Uncirculated details but net graded AU-50 due to very light obverse scratches that are best visible crossing at the Indian's eye, the second has a small lamination peel on the reverse that is not noted on the holder and the coin is straight graded AU-50 (possibly a little generous but I'm not complaining). The set, which includes several other CPG-listed varieties, is housed in 2 Capital holders, and the majority are in the XF-AU range with about a dozen UNCs and a few VFs, which are gradually being upgraded. The one I eventually choose will be displayed reverse side out.

image
image

image[/IMG]
image[/IMG]
Proud recipient of the coveted "You Suck Award" (9/3/10).

Comments

  • Options
    lasvegasteddylasvegasteddy Posts: 10,492 ✭✭✭
    should be a no brainer
    crack the problem noted one...that's a sweet reverse to be showing off

    keeping the straight graded one...graded...as that peel/lamination might bar it from ever being straight graded again image

    all that aside
    awesome coins those 35 ddr's

    i love that top one...i'd even bet it could straight grade if you tried
    everything in life is but merely on loan to us by our appreciation....lose your appreciation and see


  • Options
    Type2Type2 Posts: 13,985 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Nice DDR but like image lasvegasteddy and need to see the set's as well.



    image


    Hoard the keys.
  • Options


    << <i>Nice DDR but like image lasvegasteddy and need to see the set's as well.



    image >>



    This and I need to see the set even more, it is not nice to tease us like this!!!! I wanted to ad that the FS-801 is more visible than the FS-803 but "worth" less than the FS-803 for those who collect these and are concerned with value. I prefer the 801 as it is easier to see.
  • Options
    OnWithTheHuntOnWithTheHunt Posts: 1,312 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Thanks for the advice. Here's the link to pics of the set I posted a few years ago. Since then, I've upgraded the 15-S, 1919, 1920 D&S, 1921-S, 1926-D and a few from the 30s. Sorry one of the reverse photos got deleted somewhere along the way. Obviously, the 16/16 and the 18/7D are a bit lower grades.

    Text
    Proud recipient of the coveted "You Suck Award" (9/3/10).
  • Options
    I would suggest reposting that set with some images of some of the better and hard to find varieties. I say this because we have a good number of people on the board who like buffs and for those collecting that are new would love to see your set. many of us will never get close to a set like that and it is special. Please share it again as it should be seen!
  • Options
    koynekwestkoynekwest Posts: 10,048 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>Nice DDR but like image lasvegasteddy and need to see the set's as well.



    image >>



    This and I need to see the set even more, it is not nice to tease us like this!!!! I wanted to ad that the FS-801 is more visible than the FS-803 but "worth" less than the FS-803 for those who collect these and are concerned with value. I prefer the 801 as it is easier to see. >>



    That disparity between Dies #1 and #3 is due to a couple of insane prices paid for #3 a couple of years ago. #1 is worth much more IMO.

    I'd crack #1-it's an earlier die state and that net grade will affect the value considerably.
  • Options
    rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I would go with number one..... Cheers, RickO
  • Options
    crazyhounddogcrazyhounddog Posts: 14,234 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I would go with number one..... Cheers, RickO >>



    I agree.image
    The bitterness of "Poor Quality" is remembered long after the sweetness of low price is forgotten.
  • Options
    TopographicOceansTopographicOceans Posts: 6,535 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i><< I would go with number one..... Cheers, RickO >>
    I agreeimage
    >>

    image
  • Options
    ad4400ad4400 Posts: 2,288 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I too would add the first one to the set. Just my opinion but I find the lamination distracting
  • Options
    buffnutbuffnut Posts: 935 ✭✭
    I'm with the crowd on this one. The first example is much more visually appealing IMO.
  • Options
    telephoto1telephoto1 Posts: 4,966 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Crack the problem coin. I like the second one but as a standalone 'error' piece.

    RIP Mom- 1932-2012

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file