I gave this 1909-S VDB the benefit of doubt since the photo / scan was taken through a flip. My mind tells me that it is 99.5 % a counterfeit, but for those who did bid on this auction, I hope that it is not.
Need the following OBW rolls to complete my 46-64 Roosevelt roll set: 1947-P & D; 1948-D; 1949-P & S; 1950-D & S; and 1952-S. Any help locating any of these OBW rolls would be gratefully appreciated!
Not even close, it is a fake despite the fact that I could not get a close-up picture. This is a joke.
Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
Scratches are on the coin, right? If you didn't think it was fake before, the scratches are a dead giveaway. Someone deliberately defaced it because it's fake.
<< <i>Scratches are on the coin, right? If you didn't think it was fake before, the scratches are a dead giveaway. Someone deliberately defaced it because it's fake. >>
Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
Comments
where is the LOL option on the poll
edit to add:
this is the account that had the 71-cc 10c recently posted.
.
<< <i>.
where is the LOL option on the poll
edit to add:
this is the account that had the 71-cc 10c recently posted.
. >>
Added.
yes same seller.
mbogoman
https://pcgs.com/setregistry/collectors-showcase/classic-issues-colonials-through-1964/zambezi-collection-trade-dollars/7345Asesabi Lutho
FFC.
<< <i>You're kidding, right?!? >>
.
jeff
HH
1947-P & D; 1948-D; 1949-P & S; 1950-D & S; and 1952-S.
Any help locating any of these OBW rolls would be gratefully appreciated!
WS
<< <i>Scratches are on the coin, right? If you didn't think it was fake before, the scratches are a dead giveaway. Someone deliberately defaced it because it's fake.
That makes sense to me.
Those scratches are horrendous and the s is too large for starters..,
Terrible images, even at that I vote FAkE.
Happy, humble, honored and proud recipient of the “You Suck” award 10/22/2014
RAD#306
<< <i>- must be the rare Large S variety….
WS >>
as well, it is an ultra-rare off-metal!
.
BHNC #203
TD
No.
Comments?
As sorry as those auction images are,it is still possible to tell that the piece being offered is a fake.
Whoever is careless with the truth in small matters cannot be trusted with important matters.